Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Hunt County Inc

The united way of hunt county fights for the health, education and financial stability of every person in every community.

$119k
Granted FY2018
7
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Human Services$41kHealth$38kFood & Nutrition$12kYouth Development$12kCrime & Legal$7k
02FY2018 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $54,267, the rows itemized in this filing. The $119,439 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $65,172 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k5 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$54k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Senior Center Resources$13,600
Lakes Regional MHMRECI$10,000
Women in Need$6,667
Boys and Girls Club$6,000
Hunt County Shared Ministries$6,000
Southwest Diabetic Foundation$6,000
Raffa Clinic$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SENIOR CENTER RESOURCES: $14k → 13%Senior Center Resources: $14k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$84k · 5 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$84k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+78%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Human ServicesReligionRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SENIOR CENTER RESOURCES AND PUBLIC TRANSIT INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $27k · revenue +56%
  • HC
    HUNT COUNTY SHARED MINISTRIES INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $12k · revenue +33%
  • SD
    SOUTHWESTERN DIABETIC FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $12k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • CF
    CASA FOR HUNT COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +77%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHEAST TX INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +78%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lone Star Casa Inc

Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…

Civil Rights
2
South Central Houston Action Council Inc

The organization provides medical services in the form of primary and preventive care to underserved and underinsured residents of harris county.

—
3
Casa of Harrison County

To provide trained court appointed volunteers to serve as advocates for the best interests of abused and neglected children in harrison county texas

Youth Development
4
Northeast Texas Casa Inc

To work to ensure children receive the needed services to overcome abuse and neglect.

Civil Rights
5
Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services
6
Children's Aid Society of West Tx Inc

To provide shelter, supervision, and counseling for children in crisis; to cooperate with other agencies in order to resolve problems related to the welfare of these children; to assist the families of these children in seeking possible…

Human Services
7
Hays County Food Bank

To alleviate hunger by distributing food to families who are food deprived through a network of volunteers and other agencies within Hays County.

—
8
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Hidalgo Count

To provide services for the protection of abused and neglected children that are in the custody of the State of Texas.

Civil Rights
9
Northwest Texas Council of Boy Scouts of America

The mission of the Boy Scouts of America is to prepare young people to make ethical choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law. The aims of the Boy Scouts of America is to promote character…

—
10
Casa of South Texas Inc

Child Advocacy

Human Services
11
Childrens Advocacy Center of West Texas Inc

The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.

Crime & Legal
12
Meals On Wheels - Walker Countytx Inc

The center functions to serve senior adults 60 yrs and older. provide programs and services that will enable the individuals to be an integral part of the community and allow them to retain independence dignity and sense of well being

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa for Hunt County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Southwestern Diabetic Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LAKES REGIONAL MHMRECI: $20,117 · OtherLAKES REGIONAL MHMRECIWOMEN IN NEED INC: $13,467 · OtherWOMEN IN NEED INCBoys and Girls Club: $6,000 · OtherBoys and Girls ClubSENIOR CENTER RESOURCES AND PUBLIC TRANSIT INC: $27,400 · Human ServicesSENIOR CENTER RESOURCES AND PUBLIC…RAFFA CLINIC: $6,000 · Human ServicesRAFFA CLINICHUNT COUNTY SHARED MINISTRIES INC: $12,000 · ReligionHUNT COUNTY …SOUTHWESTERN DIABETIC FOUNDATION INC: $11,500 · Recreation & SportsSOUTHWESTER…CASA FOR HUNT COUNTY INC: $7,068 · Crime & LegalBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHEAST TX INC: $6,000 · Youth Development
Other$39,584Human Services$33,400Religion$12,000Recreation & Sports$11,500Crime & Legal$7,068Youth Development$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSENIOR CENTER RESOURCES AND PUBLIC TRANSIT INC: $27,400 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWOMEN IN NEED INC: $13,467 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHUNT COUNTY SHARED MINISTRIES INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN DIABETIC FOUNDATION INC: $11,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHEAST TX INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRAFFA CLINIC: $6,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fl Young Foundation IncTX17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fl Young Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Hunt County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Hunt County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to United Way of Hunt County Inc?

    Find your warmest path to United Way of Hunt County Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient (grants abroad are filed by region only, and grants under $5,000 are not itemized), so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Hunt County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph