Loading…
· Public charity
United Way of Hunt County Inc
The united way of hunt county fights for the health, education and financial stability of every person in every community.
$119k
Granted FY2018
7
Grants
1
Communities
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
0164% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2018.
Human Services$33kReligion$12kRecreation & Sports$12kCrime & Legal$7kYouth Development$6kOther$40k
02FY2018 · 7 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2018
- Under $10k5 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$126k
Total assets
Largest grants
- Senior Center Resources$13,600
- Lakes Regional MHMRECI$10,000
- Women in Need$6,667
- Southwest Diabetic Foundation$6,000
- Hunt County Shared Ministries$6,000
- Raffa Clinic$6,000
- Boys and Girls Club$6,000
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$84k · 5 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else
5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
5
2
Total granted
$84k
$13k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+36%
+78%
Still filing today
80%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2018, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesReligionRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCSenior Center Resources2× · 2017–2018 · $27k · revenue +36%
- HCHunt County Shared Ministries2× · 2017–2018 · $12k · revenue +32%
- SDSouthwest Diabetic Foundation2× · 2017–2018 · $12k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- CFCASA FOR HUNT COUNTYgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +77%
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +78%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Boys & Girls Club of Huntington
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.
Youth Development
2
Hunt County Rape Crisis Center Inc
Crisis intervention, education and counseling
Health
3
Lone Star Casa Inc
Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…
Civil Rights
4
Houston County Council On Aging Inc
The organization's primary mission is to provide nutritious meals to eligible persons allowing them to maintain their independence.
Human Services
5
Boy Scouts of America
To prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes.
—
6
Senior Center of Walker County
The center functions to serve senior adults 60 yrs and older. provide programs and services that will enable the individuals to be an integral part of the community and allow them to retain independence dignity and sense of well being
Human Services
7
Girl Scouts of North Central Alabama
Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence, and character, who make the world a better place.
Youth Development
8
Boys and Girls Club of Harlingen
Provides recreation/education for youth.
—
9
Hunton Young Mens Christian Association
The William A.Hunton YMCA is a nonprofit voluntary health and welfare organization that operates a community center providing wellness and community services to the local community through day care, after school care, and a variety of…
—
10
Northwest Texas Council of Boy Scouts of
The council is devoted to promoting the ability of boys, young men and women to do things for themselves and others, training them in scoutcraft, teaching patriotism, courage, and self-reliance. The council also prepares them to make…
—
11
Boys Club of Brazos County Inc
Service to youth
Youth Development
12
South County Community Services
To alleviate hunger and homelessness in south santa clara county by providing food, housing and employment related services, and advocating for system changes to improve the quality of life for the most vulnerable people in the communities…
Food & Nutrition
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa for Hunt County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Women in Need Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$39,584Human Services$33,400Religion$12,000Recreation & Sports$11,500Crime & Legal$7,068Youth Development$6,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Fl Young Foundation IncTX13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Fl Young Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation United Way of Hunt County Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Raffa Clinic.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~5 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.7× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 223859508 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Raffa Clinic, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to United Way of Hunt County Inc?
Find your warmest path to United Way of Hunt County Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines