Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Haywood County Inc

To improve the quality of life in haywood county by uniting community volunteer funding efforts.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$478kFood & Nutrition$377kHealth$127kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kCommunity Improvement$100kInternational$84kYouth Development$64kHousing & Shelter$52kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $212,140, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,406,908 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,194,768 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $190k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAYWOOD ADVANCEMENT$40,000
REACH OF HAYWOOD COUNTY$22,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$20,000
KARE$18,000
WNC COMMUNITIES$15,000
MANNA FOOD BANK$13,500
LIFEWORKS WITH CHRISTIAN WOMENS$11,000
SALVATION ARMY$10,000
HIGHTS INC$10,000
COMMUNITY KITCHEN$10,000
ARC OF HAYWOOD$10,000
HAYWOOD PATHWAYS CENTER$10,000
HAYWOOD CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES$9,000
MAPLE LEAF ADULT DAY RESPITE$8,000
MPI- FOSTER GRDSR COMPANION$5,640
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $376k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%REACH OF HAYWOOD COUNTY: $24k → 12%REACH OF HAYWOOD COUNTY: $24k → 12%REACH OF HAYWOOD COUNTY: $22k → 12%REACH OF HAYWOOD COUNTY: $22k → 12%REACH OF HAYWOOD COUNTY: $22k → 12%REACH OF HAYWOOD COUNTY: $22k → 12%REACH OF HAYWOOD COUNTY: $21k → 12%KARE: $20k → 12%HAYWOOD CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $20k → 12%REACH OF HAYWOOD COUNTY: $19k → 12%REACH OF HAYWOOD COUNTY: $19k → 12%KARE: $18k → 12%HAYWOOD CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $15k → 12%KARE: $15k → 12%HAYWOOD CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $14k → 12%KARE: $12k → 12%KARE: $10k → 12%KARE: $10k → 12%KARE: $10k → 12%HAYWOOD CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $9k → 12%HAYWOOD CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $9k → 12%KARE: $9k → 12%KARE: $9k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 17 repeat orgs$131k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +99% since the first grant, against +65% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
3

Total granted

$1.4M
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
+65%

Still filing today

82%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterInternationalPublic BenefitPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RO
    REACH OF HAYWOOD COUNTY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $196k · revenue +178%
  • MO
    Meals on Wheels of Asheville and Buncombe County Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $166k · revenue +193%
  • MANNA FOOD BANK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $118k · revenue +230%

Funded once

  • MB
    MOUNTAIN BIZCAPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue +65%
  • HC
    HAYWOOD COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -47%
  • HC
    HAYWOOD COUNTY 4H
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hickory County Cares

Food distribution to the needy

Human Services
2
Hawthorn Heights Wnc Inc

Providing a safe, nurturing environment for youth in need

Crime & Legal
3
The Hunger and Health Coalition Inc

The hunger and health coalition relieves poverty and hunger for households experiencing economic hardship and food insecurity. we serve low-income and uninsured residents of avery, watauga and ashe counties who are forced to choose between…

Food & Nutrition
4
Wnc Lighthouse Inc

The mission of WNC Lighthouse Inc is Changing lives, by being a light for Christ our Lord. Our vision is To be fully devoted to Jesus Christ, by opening our arms and providing Christian services to the underseved children, adults and…

Human Services
5
Hayswood Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
6
Restoring Hope Center Inc

Restoring Hope Center, Inc. is a benovolence organization operating in Laurinburg, NC. The organization has benevolence programs providing food and supplies to the local area, supplies other smaller like-kind organizations, conducts a…

Human Services
7
Haywood Waterways Association Inc

To work to improve & protect surface water in haywood county, north carolina.

Environment
8
Haywood Pet Care Inc

Providing low-cost spay/neuter services and animal wellness programs

Animals
9
Haywood Health Foundation Inc

To improve healthcare for residents of Haywood County through addressing unmet healthcare needs

Health
10
Hope Villages of America Inc

We provide hope restoration with dignity to those in need through innovative programs and services.

Human Services
11
Helping Hands of Haywood
Health
12
Habitat for Humanity of Berkeley County

Habitat for Humanity of Berkeley County (HFHBC) is a community-level Habitat for Humanity organization that acts in partnership with and on behalf of Habitat for Humanity International. HFHBC seeks to put Gods love into action by brings…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mountain Projects Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Salvation Army World Service Office. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Meals on Wheels of Asheville and Buncombe County Inc: $165,573 · Food & NutritionMeals on Wheels of Asheville and …MANNA FOOD BANK INC: $118,063 · Food & NutritionMANNA FOOD BANK INCTHE COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $93,538 · Food & NutritionTHE COMMUNITY KITCHEN INCWNC Communities: $75,000 · Food & NutritionWNC CommunitiesREACH OF HAYWOOD COUNTY INC: $195,924 · Human ServicesREACH OF HAYWOOD COUNTY INCKARE Inc: $112,692 · Human ServicesKARE IncHaywood Christian Ministry Inc: $67,000 · Human ServicesHaywood Christian Ministry …THE ARC OF HAYWOOD COUNTY INC: $108,114 · OtherTHE ARC OF HAYWOOD COUNTY IN…MAPLE LEAF ADULT DAY RESPITE: $41,560 · OtherMAPLE LEAF ADULT DAY RESPITEMOUNTAIN PROJECTS INC: $38,837 · OtherMOUNTAIN PROJECTS INCMAPLE LEAF ADULT DAY RESPITE: $32,919 · OtherMAPLE LEAF ADULT DAY RESPITEHAYWOOD COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD INC: $25,000 · OtherHAYWOOD COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD …GOOD SAMARITAN CLINIC OF HAYWOOD CO: $19,000 · OtherHIGHTS Inc: $58,568 · OtherHIGHTS IncHAYWOOD ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · OtherHAYWOOD ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATI…CLOTHES TO KIDS OF HAYWOOD COUNTY: $16,500 · Other+1 more: $6,000 · OtherLIFEWORKS ENRICHMENT TRAINING CENTER: $95,230 · Public BenefitHaywood Pathways Center Inc: $89,357 · Housing & ShelterTHE SALVATION ARMY WORLD SERVICE OFFICE: $83,922 · InternationalMOUNTAIN BIZCAPITAL INC: $60,000 · Philanthropy
Food & Nutrition$452,174Human Services$375,616Other$386,498Public Benefit$95,230Housing & Shelter$89,357International$83,922Philanthropy$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREACH OF HAYWOOD COUNTY INC: $195,924 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Asheville and Buncombe County Inc: $165,573 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $118,063 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetKARE Inc: $112,692 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetTHE ARC OF HAYWOOD COUNTY INC: $108,114 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetLIFEWORKS ENRICHMENT TRAINING CENTER: $95,230 over 8y, 27% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $93,538 over 9y, 8.2% of budgetHaywood Pathways Center Inc: $89,357 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetTHE SALVATION ARMY WORLD SERVICE OFFICE: $83,922 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWNC Communities: $75,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetHaywood Christian Ministry Inc: $67,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetMOUNTAIN BIZCAPITAL INC: $60,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHIGHTS Inc: $58,568 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetMOUNTAIN PROJECTS INC: $38,837 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHAYWOOD COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN CLINIC OF HAYWOOD CO: $19,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds REACH OF HAYWOOD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Meals on Wheels of Asheville and Buncombe County Inc ↗
  • Who funds MANNA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds KARE Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF HAYWOOD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFEWORKS ENRICHMENT TRAINING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Haywood Pathways Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SALVATION ARMY WORLD SERVICE OFFICE ↗
  • Who funds WNC Communities ↗
  • Who funds Haywood Christian Ministry Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN BIZCAPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGHTS Inc ↗
  • Who funds HAYWOOD ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN PROJECTS INC ↗
  • Who funds HAYWOOD COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN CLINIC OF HAYWOOD CO ↗
  • Who funds CLOTHES TO KIDS OF HAYWOOD COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina IncNC27.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Wnc Bridge Foundation · Dogwood Health Trust · The John C Harmon Family Foundation · North Carolina Community Foundation · Pisgah Health Foundation · Haywood Health Foundation Inc · Evergreen Foundation · Manna Food Bank Inc · Ken & Deborah Wilson Foundation Inc · Impact Health · Gradison Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Haywood County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Haywood County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Haywood County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph