Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Harvey and Marion Counties Inc

Mobilizing communities to create lasting changes that improve lives

$132k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$206kEducation$160kCrime & Legal$135kFood & Nutrition$131kHuman Services$123kYouth Development$69kCivil Rights$51kArts & Culture$28kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $91,729, the rows itemized in this filing. The $131,994 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $40,265 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$8,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$432k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEWTON MEALS ON WHEELS$19,000
DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION$13,312
SAFEHOPE$12,500
CASAA VOICE FOR CHILDREN INC$9,000
EPISCOPAL SOCIAL SERVICESBREAKTHROUGH-NEWTON CLUBHOUSE$8,000
CIRCLES OF HOPE$8,000
NRC CLUBHOUSE$8,000
HEART TO HEART CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$7,917
THUMC RESPITE CARE$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $160k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HESSTON COMMUNITY CHILD CARE: $7k → 9%HESSTON COMMUNITY CHILD CARE: $6k → 9%WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $7k → 16%SAFEHOPE: $20k → 9%SAFEHOPE: $17k → 9%SAFEHOPE: $17k → 9%SAFEHOPE: $15k → 9%SAFEHOPE: $14k → 9%SAFEHOPE: $13k → 9%HEART TO HEART CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 9%HEART TO HEART CHILD ADVOCACY: $10k → 9%HEART TO HEART CHILD ADVOCACY: $9k → 9%HEART TO HEART CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $8k → 9%HEART TO HEART CHILD ADVOCACY: $8k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$922k · 20 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
1

Total granted

$922k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+12%

Still filing today

70%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’23’24
Human ServicesHealthReligionCivil RightsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NM
    NEWTON MEALS ON WHEELS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $131k · revenue +115%
  • THE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $98k · revenue +190%
  • HC
    HARVEY COUNTY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT TASK FORCE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $96k · revenue +167%

Funded once

  • TW
    THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME
    3× · 2021–2023 · $7k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women's and Children's Crisis Shelter

Women's and children's crisis shelter is committed to providing safety, shelter and hope to victims of domestic violence.

Human Services
2
Harrison County Child Abuse Taskforce in C

The hero's haven child advocacy center is a child-focused, facility-based program where forensic interviews of children sexually abused by out-of-home perpetrators, or where there is a cooperative parent/custodian, are conducted, where…

—
3
Harcum House

Our mission is to reduce trauma and enhance healing by providing advocacy, education and outreach.

Human Services
4
Midwest Christian Services % Deanna Scott

Provide a home and the needs of children with no other place to go

—
5
Dawson County Parent-Child Protective Services Inc

Emergency services for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault and child abuse

Human Services
6
Sunlight Children's Services Inc

To protect and nurture children at risk by developing, supporting, serving, and protecting the interests of children.

—
7
Hope Crisis Center

Hope crisis center provides crisis line services and shelter to domestic violence and sexual assault victims

Health
8
Rusk County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

To prevent, treat, and reduce the trauma of the investigative process for child abuse victims and their non-offending family members.

Crime & Legal
9
Northwest Arkansas Children's Shelter in Dba Everhope Arkansas Inc

To provide a safe have, high quality care, and hope for the future to chidren who have been abandoned, abused, or neglected.

Human Services
10
Children's Center

Children's center serves children, youth and families through comprehensive mental health services.

—
11
Child Advocacy Center of Cullman Inc

Nurturing hope, encouraging health, and promoting healing in troubled families through community collaboration, communication and cooperation

Human Services
12
New Horizons Shelter and Outreach Centers Inc

A non-profit organization which serves victims of domestic violence or sexual abuse

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Harvey County Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Task Force Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hesston Community Child Care Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
15/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEWTON MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $130,500 · OtherNEWTON MEALS ON WHEELS INCTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $98,003 · OtherTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATIONUSD 373 Newton: $72,988 · OtherUSD 373 NewtonPEACE CONNECTIONS: $60,650 · OtherPEACE CONNECTIONSTRINITY HEIGHTS RESPITE CARE: $58,500 · OtherTRINITY HEIGHTS RESPITE CAREKANSAS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC: $33,550 · OtherKANSAS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INCST MATTHEWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $29,600 · OtherOFFENDERVICTIM MINISTRIES INC: $22,500 · Other+4 more: $63,079 · Other+4 moreHARVEY COUNTY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT TASK FORCE INC: $95,710 · Human ServicesHARVEY COUNTY DOMES…HEART TO HEART CAC HARVEYMARIONMCPHERSON CAC INC: $44,197 · Human ServicesHEART TO HEART CAC …HESSTON COMMUNITY CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $12,980 · Human ServicesHESSTON COMMUNITY C…THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $7,000 · Human ServicesHEALTH MINISTRIES CLINIC INC: $92,340 · ReligionHEALTH MINI…CASA A VOICE FOR CHILDREN INC: $51,180 · Civil RightsCEREBRAL PALSY RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF KANSAS INC: $25,100 · HealthEPISCOPAL SOCIAL SERVICES INC DBA BREAKTHROUGH: $19,000 · HealthNEW HOPE SHELTER INC: $12,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$569,370Human Services$159,887Religion$92,340Civil Rights$51,180Health$44,100Housing & Shelter$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEWTON MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $130,500 over 8y, 12% of budgetTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $98,003 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHARVEY COUNTY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT TASK FORCE INC: $95,710 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetHEALTH MINISTRIES CLINIC INC: $92,340 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetPEACE CONNECTIONS: $60,650 over 8y, 5.7% of budgetCASA A VOICE FOR CHILDREN INC: $51,180 over 7y, 8.4% of budgetHEART TO HEART CAC HARVEYMARIONMCPHERSON CAC INC: $44,197 over 7y, 7.0% of budgetKANSAS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC: $33,550 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCEREBRAL PALSY RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF KANSAS INC: $25,100 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOFFENDERVICTIM MINISTRIES INC: $22,500 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetEPISCOPAL SOCIAL SERVICES INC DBA BREAKTHROUGH: $19,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNEWTON COMMUNITY CHILDCARE CENTER INC: $18,079 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetNEWTON AREA SENIOR CENTER INC: $15,000 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetHESSTON COMMUNITY CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $12,980 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetNEW HOPE SHELTER INC: $12,500 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEWTON MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HARVEY COUNTY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH MINISTRIES CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds PEACE CONNECTIONS ↗
  • Who funds CASA A VOICE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART TO HEART CAC HARVEYMARIONMCPHERSON CAC INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CEREBRAL PALSY RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF KANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds OFFENDERVICTIM MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL SOCIAL SERVICES INC DBA BREAKTHROUGH ↗
  • Who funds NEWTON COMMUNITY CHILDCARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEWTON AREA SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HESSTON COMMUNITY CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW HOPE SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Kansas Community FoundationKS30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Kansas Community Foundation · United Way of the Plains Inc · Greater Horizons · United Way of McPherson County Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Harvey and Marion Counties Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Harvey and Marion Counties Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to United Way of Harvey and Marion Counties Inc?

    Find your warmest path to United Way of Harvey and Marion Counties Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Harvey and Marion Counties’ filings →

    More from the funding graph