· Public charity
United Way of Harvey and Marion Counties Inc
Mobilizing communities to create lasting changes that improve lives
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $91,729 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $131,994 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $40,265 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $47k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEWTON MEALS ON WHEELS | $19,000 |
| DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION | $13,312 |
| SAFEHOPE | $12,500 |
| CASAA VOICE FOR CHILDREN INC | $9,000 |
| EPISCOPAL SOCIAL SERVICESBREAKTHROUGH-NEWTON CLUBHOUSE | $8,000 |
| NRC CLUBHOUSE | $8,000 |
| CIRCLES OF HOPE | $8,000 |
| HEART TO HEART CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER | $7,917 |
| THUMC RESPITE CARE | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $160k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NMNEWTON MEALS ON WHEELS INC8× · 2017–2024 · $131k · revenue +115%
THE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $98k · revenue +190%- HCHARVEY COUNTY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT TASK FORCE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $96k · revenue +167%
Funded once
- TWTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME3× · 2021–2023 · $7k · revenue +12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Women's and children's crisis shelter is committed to providing safety, shelter and hope to victims of domestic violence.
The hero's haven child advocacy center is a child-focused, facility-based program where forensic interviews of children sexually abused by out-of-home perpetrators, or where there is a cooperative parent/custodian, are conducted, where…
Our mission is to reduce trauma and enhance healing by providing advocacy, education and outreach.
Provide a home and the needs of children with no other place to go
Emergency services for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault and child abuse
To protect and nurture children at risk by developing, supporting, serving, and protecting the interests of children.
Hope crisis center provides crisis line services and shelter to domestic violence and sexual assault victims
To prevent, treat, and reduce the trauma of the investigative process for child abuse victims and their non-offending family members.
To provide a safe have, high quality care, and hope for the future to chidren who have been abandoned, abused, or neglected.
Children's center serves children, youth and families through comprehensive mental health services.
Nurturing hope, encouraging health, and promoting healing in troubled families through community collaboration, communication and cooperation
A non-profit organization which serves victims of domestic violence or sexual abuse
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Harvey County Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Task Force Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hesston Community Child Care Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEWTON MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds THE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HARVEY COUNTY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT TASK FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTH MINISTRIES CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds PEACE CONNECTIONS ↗
- Who funds CASA A VOICE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds HEART TO HEART CAC HARVEYMARIONMCPHERSON CAC INC ↗
- Who funds KANSAS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC ↗
- Who funds CEREBRAL PALSY RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF KANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds OFFENDERVICTIM MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds EPISCOPAL SOCIAL SERVICES INC DBA BREAKTHROUGH ↗
- Who funds NEWTON COMMUNITY CHILDCARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEWTON AREA SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HESSTON COMMUNITY CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NEW HOPE SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Central Kansas Community Foundation · United Way of the Plains Inc · Greater Horizons · United Way of McPherson County Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Harvey and Marion Counties Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to United Way of Harvey and Marion Counties Inc?
Find your warmest path to United Way of Harvey and Marion Counties Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.