Skip to content
United Way of Hardin County Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

United Way of Hardin County Inc

To provide funds for other non-profit agencies in Hardin County in order to provide needed services for the citizens of Hardin County.

$175k
Granted FY2020
16
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2020.

Human Services$68kYouth Development$40kFood & Nutrition$34kReligion$26kHealth$24kPublic Safety & Disaster$21kEducation$20kCrime & Legal$14kOther$0
02FY2020 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $159,699, the rows itemized in this filing. The $174,687 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $14,988 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k9 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $95k
$9,837
Median grant
1
States reached
$320k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Helping Hands Outreach$20,326
Hardin Co Family YMCA$16,440
Love in the Name of Christ$13,648
American Red Cross$12,444
Dolly Partons Imag Library$11,614
Big BrothersBig Sisters$10,634
PASS$10,000
Hardin Co Council on Aging$9,837
Safe Haven of Hardin Co$8,361
New Hope$8,329
Community Health Professional$8,134
Neighborhood Oppor Center$7,442
Beautides$6,374
Mobility Foundation$5,520
Salvation Army$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%PASS: $10k → 13%American Red Cross: $12k → 14%Helping Hands Outreach: $20k → 15%HELPING HANDS OUTREACH: $20k → 15%HARDIN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $12k → 15%Hardin Co Council on Aging: $10k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $8k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$214k · 9 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$214k
$8k

Still filing today

89%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20
Human ServicesReligionEducationCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    Hardin County Council on Aging Inc
    2× · 2019–2020 · $22k · revenue +11%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    2× · 2019–2020 · $21k · revenue +39%
  • SH
    Safe Haven of Hardin County Inc
    2× · 2019–2020 · $14k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • NH
    NEW HOPE MINISTRY PARK LLC
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dyer County Office on Aging Inc

To provide activities and services for senior citizens of Dyer County

Human Services
2
Wv Helping Hands
Human Services
3
Harlan County Senior Services Inc

Offers programs & services to older persons such as meals, house keeping, yard work, public transportation, and social activities.

Human Services
4
Tyler County Family Resource Network Inc

To serve as the primary planning and coordinating body to promote

Human Services
5
Helping Hand of Hope Inc

To provide temporary emergency assistance including food, clothing, shelter, transportation, medical and other assistance to individuals in the hardin county, kentucky area.

Human Services
6
Humane Society of Hardy County Inc

The Humane Society Hardy County strives reduce feral animal populations while enhancing the health of our communities and providing for those animals that may be adopted, a safe, nurturing, and healthy environment.

Animals
7
Hardin County Humane Society

The Hardin County Humane Society is dedicated to the prevention and alleviation of animal suffering, the elimination of pet overpopulation, and the education for the public about responsible pet ownership in the are served by the Society.

Animals
8
Harrison County Substance Abuse Prevention Coalition Inc

To provide an organization through which the community can plan and implement efforts to address the problems of substance abuse and dependency for the citizens of Harrison County.

Health
9
Hopes Hands Community Collaborative

Create opportunities for communication, networking, and learning;Build and support relationships and communities within Owen County;Identify and promote transformation in practice, services, and public policy;Develop and provide access to…

Human Services
10
Hoosier Outreach Inc the Hoosier Outreach Project
—
11
Helping Hands in Hardin Inc

Helping Hands in Hardin is a nonprofit organization working toward eradicating hunger in Big Horn County by increasing food access, and improving food quality, education and sovereignty for all.

Civil Rights
12
Henry County Prevention Coalition

Empowering the community through prevention, education, and leadership roles in reducing alcohol, tobacco, illegal drugs, and other harmful behaviors amoung our youth and families

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hardin County Family Young Mens Christian Association; the most unlike its peers is Dolly Partons Imagination Library Hardin County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HARDIN COUNTY FAMILY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $28,940 · OtherHARDIN COUNTY FAMILY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIA…BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF WEST CENTRAL OHIO INC: $18,634 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF WEST CENTRAL…NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CORPORATION OF HARDIN COUNTY OHIO: $15,442 · OtherNEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CORPORATION OF HARDI…NEW HOPE MINISTRY PARK LLC: $8,000 · OtherNEW HOPE MINISTRY PARK LLCBeautides: $6,374 · OtherBeautidesMOBILITY FOUNDATION: $5,520 · OtherMOBILITY FOUNDATIONTHE SALVATION ARMY: $5,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYBLACK SWAMP AREA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5,096 · OtherBLACK SWAMP AREA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS …Helping Hands Outreach Ministry: $40,326 · Human ServicesHelping Hands Outreach MinistryHardin County Council on Aging Inc: $21,837 · Human ServicesHardin County Council on Aging IncAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $20,623 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Consti…Prevention Awareness Support Services: $10,000 · Human ServicesPrevention Awareness Support ServicesLOVE INC of Hardin County: $33,977 · ReligionLOVE INC of Ha…DOLLY PARTONS IMAGINATION LIBRARY HARDIN COUNTY: $19,614 · EducationSafe Haven of Hardin County Inc: $14,361 · Crime & LegalCOMMUNITY HEALTH PROFESSIONALS INC: $8,134 · Health
Other$93,506Human Services$92,786Religion$33,977Education$19,614Crime & Legal$14,361Health$8,134

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHelping Hands Outreach Ministry: $40,326 over 2y, 50% of budgetLOVE INC of Hardin County: $33,977 over 2y, 29% of budgetHARDIN COUNTY FAMILY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $28,940 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetHardin County Council on Aging Inc: $21,837 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $20,623 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF WEST CENTRAL OHIO INC: $18,634 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetPrevention Awareness Support Services: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH PROFESSIONALS INC: $8,134 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLACK SWAMP AREA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5,096 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Haushalter Family Fou…Amazonsmile Foundation
Haushalter Family FoundationOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Haushalter Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Hardin County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Hardin County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $68k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2020, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Hardin County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home