Skip to content
United Way of Greater Hartsville at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

United Way of Greater Hartsville

Agency support and services.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$405kCommunity Improvement$104kHealth$102kCrime & Legal$71kPublic Safety & Disaster$62kEducation$55kYouth Development$42kHousing & Shelter$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $10,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $10,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$744k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DC Habitat for Humanities$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $368k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 20%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 20%Hartsville Interfaith Ministries: $40k → 21%Pee Dee Chapter of American Red Cross: $18k → 20%Hartsville Interfaith Ministries: $40k → 21%Pee Dee Chapter of American Red Cross: $18k → 20%Pee Dee Chapter of American Red Cross: $16k → 20%Pee Dee Chapter of American Red Cross: $10k → 20%Hartsville Interfaith Ministries: $14k → 21%Hartsville Interfaith Ministries: $6k → 21%Darlington County Council on Aging: $55k → 21%Darlington County Council on Aging: $37k → 21%Darlington County Council on Aging: $37k → 21%Darlington County Council on Aging: $36k → 21%Darlington County Council on Aging: $30k → 21%Darlington County Countil on Aging: $11k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$857k · 13 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against -56% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
1

Total granted

$857k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
-56%

Still filing today

69%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    DARLINGTON COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING
    6× · 2017–2023 · $206k · revenue +67%
  • HI
    Hartsville Interfaith Ministries
    4× · 2021–2024 · $100k · revenue +51% · 28% of their budget
  • PD
    PEE DEE COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL ASSAULT
    3× · 2017–2020 · $71k · revenue +119%

Funded once

  • OC
    ONE CHILD AT A TIME
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Carolina Public Interest Foundation
Crime & Legal
2
Palmetto Health Council Inc

Palmetto Health Council, Inc will be the model of excellence for improving the total health status of the communities it serves. All of our employees will provide comprehensive preventative, curative, and life-enhancing services in a…

Health
3
Mcleod Health

To operate a health care system providing medical excellence to the eastern region of south carolina and the extreme southeastern region of north carolina.

Health
4
Palmetto Citizens Against Sexual Assault

Provides victims of sexual assault, attempted sexual assault and incest with immediate supportive care and information about medical legal proceedings, crisis counseling, and educational programs.

—
5
Dream Center Clinic Inc

Provide free medical care to approximately 6000 patients in North Charleston, Hanahan and West Ashley, SC who are poor and had no health insurance using volunteer doctors, nurses and lay people to provide these services.

Human Services
6
Faith and Freedom Coalition of South Carolina Inc
—
7
Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence Found ation
Health
8
Pee Dee Community Action Partnership Inc

Pee dee community action partnership, inc. (pdcap) is a private, multi-county, non-profit community based organization with a tri-party representative administrating board of directors. it was founded in 1965 and designated by local…

—
9
Pee Dee Emergency Medical Services

develop plan and promote education and training for emergency medical services volunteers and professionals. Assist agencies with planning, implementation and execution of programs of public education and information on emergency medical…

—
10
Mcleod Medical Center Dillon

Organization is part of the mcleod health system. the mission of mcleod health is to improve the overall health and well being of people living within south carolina and eastern north carolina by providing excellence in healthcare.

Health
11
South Carolina Free Clinic Assoc

Help sc free clinics provide healthcare services.

Health
12
Mcleod Health Cheraw

Mcleod health cheraw operates as part of the mcleod health system. the mission of mcleod health is to improve the overall health and well being of people living within south carolina and eastern north carolina by providing excellence in…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Child At a Time; the most unlike its peers is Trident Habitat for Humanity Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Darlington County DSN Board: $104,000 · OtherDarlington County DSN BoardTHE SALVATION ARMY: $79,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYPEE DEE COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL ASSAULT: $70,500 · OtherPEE DEE COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL AS…FREE MEDICAL CLINIC OF DARLINGTON COUNTY: $45,500 · OtherFREE MEDICAL CLINIC OF DARLINGTON COUNTYPEE DEE HEARING CENTER: $26,000 · OtherPEE DEE HEARING CENTERHabitat for Humanities: $25,500 · OtherHabitat for HumanitiesYoung Men's Christian Association of the Upper Pee Dee Inc: $20,875 · OtherYoung Men's Christian Association of the Upper P…DARLINGTON COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $205,500 · Human ServicesDARLINGTON COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGINGHartsville Interfaith Ministries: $100,000 · Human ServicesHartsville Interfaith MinistriesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $62,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent C…SOUTH CAROLINA FIRST STEPS TO SCHOOL READINESS BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $45,000 · EducationONE CHILD AT A TIME: $10,000 · EducationBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE PEE DEE AREA INC: $42,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAREFIRST CAROLINA FOUNDATION: $30,750 · HealthTrident Habitat for Humanity Inc: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$371,375Human Services$367,500Education$55,000Youth Development$42,000Health$30,750Housing & Shelter$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDARLINGTON COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $205,500 over 6y, 8.3% of budgetHartsville Interfaith Ministries: $100,000 over 4y, 28% of budgetPEE DEE COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL ASSAULT: $70,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $62,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFREE MEDICAL CLINIC OF DARLINGTON COUNTY: $45,500 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA FIRST STEPS TO SCHOOL READINESS BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $45,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE PEE DEE AREA INC: $42,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCAREFIRST CAROLINA FOUNDATION: $30,750 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetPEE DEE HEARING CENTER: $26,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of the Upper Pee Dee Inc: $20,875 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetONE CHILD AT A TIME: $10,000 over 1y, 22% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Byerly FoundationDuke Energy FoundationJoan Sasser Coker and…Eastern Carolina Comm…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Byerly FoundationDE17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Byerly Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Joan Sasser Coker and Charles Westfield Coker Charitable Foundation · Eastern Carolina Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Greater Hartsville funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Greater Hartsville. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to United Way of Greater Hartsville?

    Find your warmest path to United Way of Greater Hartsville through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Greater Hartsville’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home