Skip to content
United Way of Grant County Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

United Way of Grant County Inc

Focus support for health, education and financial stability in grant county, indiana to achieve measurable results by uniting community resources.

$200k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$500kYouth Development$350kHealth$332kFood & Nutrition$331kEducation$234kRecreation & Sports$219kHousing & Shelter$103kEmployment$16kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$759k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARTIN DEPORRES CENTER$40,000
PROJECT LEADERSHIP$30,000
CANCER SERVICES$24,000
THE TRAINING CENTER$16,000
GRANT COUNTY FAMILY YMCA$15,000
RADIANT HEALTH$15,000
NEARSPACE EDUCATION$15,000
SALVATION ARMY$13,000
CAREY SERVICES$12,000
MARION-GRANT CO SENIOR CENTER$10,000
LARK'S SONG$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $416k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%CAREY SERVICES: $29k → 19%CAREY SERVICES: $28k → 19%CAREY SERVICES: $28k → 19%MARIONGRANT CO SENIOR CENTER: $13k → 19%MARIONGRANT CO SENIOR CENTER: $12k → 19%MARIONGRANT CO SENIOR CENTER: $12k → 19%CAREY SERVICES: $12k → 19%MARION-GRANT CO SENIOR CENTER: $10k → 19%MARIONGRANT CO SENIOR CENTER: $9k → 19%MARIONGRANT CO SENIOR CENTER: $8k → 19%MARIONGRANT CO SENIOR CENTER: $8k → 19%CAREY SERVICES: $7k → 19%CAREY SERVICES: $6k → 19%YMCA OF GRANT COUNTY: $39k → 19%YMCA OF GRANT COUNTY: $39k → 19%YMCA OF GRANT COUNTY: $36k → 19%YMCA OF GRANT COUNTY: $36k → 19%YMCA OF GRANT COUNTY: $29k → 19%YMCA OF GRANT COUNTY: $21k → 19%YMCA OF GRANT COUNTY: $20k → 19%GRANT COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $15k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 12 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$2.1M
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
0%

Still filing today

75%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationCivil RightsHealthEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS- AND GIRLS' CLUB OF GRANT COUNTY INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $350k · revenue ×24 · 38% of their budget
  • SM
    ST MARTIN DEPORRES CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $331k · revenue +55%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GRANT COUNTY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $234k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • GC
    GRANT COUNTY SOCIETY FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN AND ADULTS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Service Council of Grant County

pay medical and utilities for low income and transients

—
2
Marion General Hospital Inc

Marion general hospital exists to transform the health of our community through patient-centered, high quality, affordable care. best practices by leading a collaborative approach involving physicians, staff, business leaders and our…

Health
3
Greater Grant County Inc

Promote business opportunities

—
4
Perry County Services Inc

Provide support services to developmentally disabled individuals of perry county,missouri through areas of community employment, job preparation, day programs, transportation and personal assistance.

Human Services
5
Leadership Education & Development

The specific purpose of this organization is for the public benefit and to provide leadership opportunities to students primarily in grant county, indiana.

Youth Development
6
Turning Point Inc

Our mission is to provide professional counseling with the highest level of ethical standards to individuals in the community . We believe in health, healing, hope, growth, recovery and transformation as foundational goals for everyone and…

Health
7
George Goodwin Community

Social Services and Community Service

Human Services
8
Galloping Greatly Inc

Serving grant county and surrounding counties by providing individual, family and group counseling using equine assisted psycotherapy as the treatment modality

Health
9
Bridges to Health Inc

To provide primary care needs of the immediate household families of the medical indigent who live and/or work within grant county, indiana.

Health
10
Clay County Indiana Council On Aged

Assist clients to lead independent lives

—
11
Grant Rehabilitation and Care Center Inc

Grant rehabilitation and care center is dedicated to improving the health care of the residents of grant county and surrounding areas.

Human Services
12
Living Center Inc

Enhancing the quality of life through integrated healthcare.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grant-Blackford Mental Health Inc; the most unlike its peers is Project Leadership Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS- AND GIRLS' CLUB OF GRANT COUNTY INC: $349,609 · OtherBOYS- AND GIRLS' CLUB OF GRANT COUNTY INCST MARTIN DEPORRES CENTER INC: $330,657 · OtherST MARTIN DEPORRES CENTER INCFAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY INC: $303,068 · OtherFAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY INCGRANT-BLACKFORD MENTAL HEALTH INC: $147,519 · OtherGRANT-BLACKFORD MENTAL HEALTH INCSALVATION ARMY: $103,033 · OtherSALVATION ARMY+2 more: $20,389 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GRANT COUNTY INC: $234,277 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN …CAREY SERVICES INC: $109,750 · Human ServicesCAREY SERVICES INCMARION-GRANT COUNTY SENIOR CENTER: $71,791 · Human ServicesMARION-GRANT COUNTY SE…PROJECT LEADERSHIP INC: $199,078 · EducationPROJECT LEAD…NEARSPACE EDUCATION INC: $15,000 · EducationNEARSPACE ED…LARK'S SONG INC: $10,000 · EducationSERVICES FOR THE VISUALLY AND HEARING IMPAIRED INC: $112,809 · Civil RightsCANCER SERVICES OF GRANT COUNTY INC: $64,000 · HealthTRAINING CENTER INCORPORATED: $26,000 · Employment
Other$1,254,275Human Services$415,818Education$224,078Civil Rights$112,809Health$64,000Employment$26,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS- AND GIRLS' CLUB OF GRANT COUNTY INC: $349,609 over 7y, 38% of budgetST MARTIN DEPORRES CENTER INC: $330,657 over 8y, 16% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY INC: $303,068 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GRANT COUNTY INC: $234,277 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetPROJECT LEADERSHIP INC: $199,078 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetGRANT-BLACKFORD MENTAL HEALTH INC: $147,519 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSERVICES FOR THE VISUALLY AND HEARING IMPAIRED INC: $112,809 over 5y, 39% of budgetCAREY SERVICES INC: $109,750 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMARION-GRANT COUNTY SENIOR CENTER: $71,791 over 7y, 9.4% of budgetCANCER SERVICES OF GRANT COUNTY INC: $64,000 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetTRAINING CENTER INCORPORATED: $26,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetNEARSPACE EDUCATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLARK'S SONG INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Boren Foundation IncAmerican Woodmark Fou…Indiana Wesleyan Univ…Fairmount Round Robin…Atlas Foundry Foundat…Round Room Gives IncLilly Endowment IncAmazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation of Grant County Indiana IncIN22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Grant County Indiana Inc · Boren Foundation Inc · American Woodmark Foundation Inc · Indiana Wesleyan University · Fairmount Round Robins Inc · Atlas Foundry Foundation Inc · Round Room Gives Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Grant County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Grant County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Grant County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home