Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Fresno and Madera Counties

United Way Fresno and Madera Counties creates paths to prosperity.

$748k
Granted FY2023
10
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$418k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $121k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $192k
  • $250k+1 grant · $418k
$17,340
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Childrens Movement$418,122
Binational of Central Califor$192,204
Education Leadership Foundati$37,625
California Farmworker Foundat$31,250
Centro Unidad Popular Benito$17,340
Fresno Interdenominational Re$15,153
Central Valley Opportunity Ce$10,000
Community Action Partnership$10,000
Madera Coalition for Communit$9,000
Resource for Independence Cen$7,500
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $202k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%Community Action Partnership: $10k → 22%Binational of Central Califor: $192k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Valley Partnership

The Central Valley Partnership (CVP) conducts and collaborates in training initiatives, including community organizer training, education on labor history and issues, messaging workshops, etc., aimed at fostering the establishment of new…

Civil Rights
2
Center for Community Advocacy

Provide Educational Programs, Health Services and Legal Services to Farm Workers at housing sites and throughout the Salinas Valley and promote improved living conditions.

3
Central Valley Foster Care Inc

Operation of a foster family care agency

Human Services
4
Community Impact Central Valley

To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.

Health
5
Central Valley Immigrant Integration Collaborative

To serve as the leading immigrant integration organization in the Central Valley, dedicated to ensuring the full participation of immigrants in building strong, vibrant, and inclusive communities.

Human Services
6
California Alliance of Caregivers

California Alliance of Caregivers represents the voices of relative and non-relative caregivers to promote the well-being of children in foster care. California Alliance of Caregivers provides training information support and advocacy for…

Health
7
Central Valley Gender Health & Wellness
Civil Rights
8
Valley Voices

To provide education and resources to advocate for worker rights, increase socioeconomic and health equity and civic participation of our underserved and overlooked communities of the Central San Joaquin Valley.

Civil Rights
9
Community Initiatives for Collective Impact

Our mission is to join diverse people, ideas, and resources to address the most pressing social and environmental justice priorities. We believe that the community concerns of Californias San Joaquin Valley (SJV) can only be addressed if…

Community Improvement
10
Central Valley Childrens Services Network

To provide child care education, information and technical assistance to parents, community professionals and child care providers.

Human Services
11
Central Valley Journalism Collaborative

We grow local news for and from the Valley to help you live a healthy and informed life. We connect Central Valley communities with the support needed to grow and sustain local journalism.

Philanthropy
12
Focus Forward

To serve youth in the fresno county juvenile justice and foster care systems

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Resources for Independence Central Valley and the most unlike its peers is Fresno Interdenominational Refugee Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Childrens Movement of Fresno County — $418,122 · Youth DevelopmentChildrens Movement of Fresno CountyBinational of Central California — $192,204 · Human ServicesBinational of Central Californ…COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF MADERA COUNTY INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesEducation and Leadership Foundation — $37,625 · EducationEducation …CALIFORNIA FARMWORKER FOUNDATION — $31,250 · EducationCALIFORNIA…Centro de Unidad popular Benito Juarez Inc — $17,340 · OtherMadera Coalition of Community Justice — $9,000 · OtherResources for Independence Central Valley — $7,500 · OtherFRESNO INTERDENOMINATIONAL REFUGEE MINISTRIES — $15,153 · ReligionCENTRAL VALLEY OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC — $10,000 · Employment
Youth Development$418,122Human Services$202,204Education$68,875Other$33,840Religion$15,153Employment$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetChildrens Movement of Fresno County — $418,122 over 1y, 38% of budgetEducation and Leadership Foundation — $37,625 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCALIFORNIA FARMWORKER FOUNDATION — $31,250 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFRESNO INTERDENOMINATIONAL REFUGEE MINISTRIES — $15,153 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCENTRAL VALLEY OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF MADERA COUNTY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetResources for Independence Central Valley — $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program ManagementCA17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Public Health Institute · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of Fresno and Madera Counties funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph