Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of East Mississippiinc

To improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of the community by giving, advocating, and volunteering

$251k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$99k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Human Services$1.3MYouth Development$169kFood & Nutrition$85kHousing & Shelter$52kHealth$44kEducation$7kCommunity Improvement$6k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $231,380, the rows itemized in this filing. The $251,380 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $20,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $94k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $99k
$13,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$838k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION$99,481
MULTI-COUNTY$25,000
CARE LODGE$15,500
SALVATION ARMY$14,100
BOY SCOUTS$14,000
LOVE'S KITCHEN$13,500
HOPE VILLAGE FOR CHILDREN$12,000
WESLEY HOUSE$8,300
FREE CLINIC OF MERIDIAN$7,500
OTHERS UNDER 5000$7,399
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$7,300
GIRL SCOUTS OF GREATER MS$7,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 24%, against an area that typically sits at 20%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 20%HOPE VILLAGE FOR CHILDREN: $13k → 24%HOPE VILLAGE FOR CHILDREN: $12k → 24%HOPE VILLAGE FOR CHILDREN: $12k → 24%HOPE VILLAGE FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 24%FOSTER GRANDPARENTS: $7k → 24%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 17 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
4

Total granted

$1.6M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+1%

Still filing today

65%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentHealthCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $662k · revenue +176%
  • CL
    CARE LODGE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $107k · revenue +11%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EAST MISSISSIPPI
    6× · 2018–2024 · $97k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • FB
    FEED BY FAITH
    one grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue -30%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR PREGNANCY CHOICES OF MDNgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Meadows Housing Corporation Inc

To provide housing and services to low, very low, and extremely low income families.

Housing & Shelter
2
Greater Meridian Health Clinic Inc

GMHC was organized to provide family centered, community oriented, and comprehensive health services to patients in Meridian and surrounding areas.

Health
3
Lumberton Christian Care Center Inc

To provide free meals and temporary shelter for the needy of robeson county.

—
4
Family Health Care Clinic Inc

To provide quality, accessible, and cost effective primary health care services.

Health
5
Community of Hope Health Clinic

Provide free medical services for uninsured residents of shelby county, alabama.

Health
6
Macon Volunteer Clinic Inc

Macon Volunteer Clinic (MVC)provides free primary medical and dental care, as well as medication assistance, to uninsured, working adult residents of Middle Georgia. All patients live at or below 200% of federal poverty level.

Health
7
Feeding the Gulf Coast

The Organization is a tax-exempt food distribution center committed to providing nutritionally balanced food for hungry people in 24 counties in Alabama, Florida and Mississippi.

Food & Nutrition
8
Mercy House Inc

The mercy house provides spiritual, social, and educational services to people in need. our purpose is to redirect lives through the services we provide.

Human Services
9
Child Advocacy Center of Marshall County Alabama Inc

To provide comprehensive services to victims of child abuse.

Crime & Legal
10
Delta Health Center Inc

The organization provides family centered, community oriented and comprehensive health services to the people in mound bayou, ms and the surrounding area.

—
11
Wesley-Asbury Inc

Provide housing and services as a licensed residential home for the aged.

Housing & Shelter
12
Friends of Children of Mississippi Inc

To operate a head start and early head start program for children and families in mississippi.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Care Lodge Domestic Violence Shelter Inc; the most unlike its peers is Feed By Faith. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $662,107 · OtherTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATIONTHE SALVATION ARMY: $93,699 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYOTHERS LESS THAN 5000: $86,504 · OtherOTHERS LESS THAN 5000MULTI-COUNTY COMMUNITY: $69,477 · OtherMULTI-COUNTY COMMUNITYOTHERS UNDER 5000: $48,223 · OtherWESLEY HOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $45,538 · OtherCHOCTAW AREA COUNCIL NO 302 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $45,024 · Other+6 more: $137,941 · Other+6 moreCARE LODGE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER INC: $106,857 · Human ServicesCARE LODGE DOMES…HOPE VILLAGE FOR CHILDREN INC: $91,116 · Human ServicesHOPE VILLAGE FOR…Multi-County Community Service Agency Inc: $37,819 · Human ServicesMulti-County Com…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EAST MISSISSIPPI: $96,652 · Youth DevelopmentLAUDERDALE OUTREACH & VOL EFFORT: $78,474 · Food & NutritionFEED BY FAITH: $7,000 · Food & NutritionFREE CLINIC OF MERIDIAN INC: $43,580 · HealthCENTER FOR PREGNANCY CHOICES OF MDN: $6,500 · EducationTHE MONTGOMERY INSTITUTE: $6,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,188,513Human Services$235,792Youth Development$96,652Food & Nutrition$85,474Health$43,580Education$6,500Community Improvement$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $662,107 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCARE LODGE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER INC: $106,857 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EAST MISSISSIPPI: $96,652 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetHOPE VILLAGE FOR CHILDREN INC: $91,116 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetLAUDERDALE OUTREACH & VOL EFFORT: $78,474 over 7y, 7.3% of budgetWESLEY HOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $45,538 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetCHOCTAW AREA COUNCIL NO 302 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $45,024 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetFREE CLINIC OF MERIDIAN INC: $43,580 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetMulti-County Community Service Agency Inc: $37,819 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF GREATER MISSISSIPPI: $27,125 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetLAUDERDALE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $12,775 over 2y, 27% of budgetFEED BY FAITH: $7,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetCENTER FOR PREGNANCY CHOICES OF MDN: $6,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CARE LODGE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EAST MISSISSIPPI ↗
  • Who funds HOPE VILLAGE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds LAUDERDALE OUTREACH & VOL EFFORT ↗
  • Who funds WESLEY HOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHOCTAW AREA COUNCIL NO 302 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds FREE CLINIC OF MERIDIAN INC ↗
  • Who funds Multi-County Community Service Agency Inc ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF GREATER MISSISSIPPI ↗
  • Who funds LAUDERDALE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds FEED BY FAITH ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR PREGNANCY CHOICES OF MDN ↗
  • Who funds THE MONTGOMERY INSTITUTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Riley FoundationMS24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Riley Foundation · William Robert Baird Charitable Trust · Community Foundation of East Mississippi · Mississippi Food Network Inc · The Paul and Sherry Broadhead Foundation · Mississippi Power Foundation Inc · The Hardy Poindexter Graham Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of East Mississippiinc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of East Mississippiinc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of East Mississippiinc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph