Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Clare County

Responsible volunteers enhancing the opportunity for the people of clare and gladwin counties to care for one another.

$786k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$225kYouth Development$121kHousing & Shelter$105kHealth$86kCrime & Legal$77kEmployment$46kHuman Services$36kFood & Nutrition$9k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $97,840, the rows itemized in this filing. The $786,207 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $688,367 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $48k
$8,698
Median grant
1
States reached
$392k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHELTERHOUSE OF MIDLAND AND GLADWIN COUNTIES$18,649
LISTENING EAR$16,000
MID MICHIGAN INDUSTRIES$13,027
FOOD BANK OF EASTERN MICHIGAN$9,000
MID MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY$8,698
TEN SIXTEEN RECOVERY NETWORK$8,094
WOMEN'S AID SERVICES INC$7,544
2-1-1 NORTHEAST MICHIGAN$5,900
MID MICHIGAN BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$5,628
CLARE GLADWIN GREAT START COLLABORATIVE$5,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $132k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%SHELTERHOUSE OF MIDLAND AND GLADWIN COUNTIES: $19k → 14%SHELTERHOUSE OF MIDLAND AND GLADWIN COUNTIES: $9k → 14%SHELTERHOUSE OF MIDLAND AND GLADWIN COUNTIES: $8k → 14%MID MICHIGAN BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $17k → 17%MID MICHIGAN BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $16k → 17%MID MICHIGAN BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $16k → 17%MID MICHIGAN BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $16k → 17%MID MICHIGAN BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $15k → 17%MID MICHIGAN BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $10k → 17%MID MICHIGAN BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $6k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$689k · 10 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$689k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
0%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHealthEmploymentFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MID MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $200k · revenue +141%
  • CC
    CRISIS CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $105k · revenue +32%
  • MM
    MID MICHIGAN BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $96k · revenue +191%

Funded once

  • FB
    Food Bank of Eastern Michigan
    2× · 2024–2025 · $9k · revenue -3%
  • 2N
    211 Northeast Michigan
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Midmichigan Health Services

To provide high quality community-oriented, patient-centered health services for all.

Health
2
Housing Services of Mid Michigan

To assist people with low or moderate income to obtain safe and affordable housing

Housing & Shelter
3
Midland County Cancer Society Dba Cancer Services

To provide personal and compassionate support to cancer patients and their caregivers in our community.

—
4
Northwest Michigan Supportive Housing

To provide housing and case management services for the homeless and mentally ill within the community.

Human Services
5
Habitat for Humanity of Michigan Inc

Our mission is to assist our affiliates to increase capacity to build simple decent homes in partnership with people in need in the State of Michigan.

Housing & Shelter
6
Michigan Legal Services

Provide free legal assistance to indigent and low income persons

Crime & Legal
7
Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

—
8
Midland County Food Assistance Network

To operate a network of food pantries to provide food to those in need.

—
9
Michigan Family Resources

Michigan Family Resources mission is to deliver holistic family-centered services to children that promote their well-being and development.

Education
10
Northwest Michigan Rural Housing Partnership

To help provide safe, accessible, and affordable housing in Northwest Michigan.

Housing & Shelter
11
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
12
Area Agency On Aging of Western Michigan Inc

Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid Michigan Community Action Agency Inc; the most unlike its peers is Girls on the Run of Central Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MID MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $199,942 · OtherMID MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY IN…Girls on the Run of Central Michigan: $25,331 · OtherGirls on the Run of Central MichiganCLARE GLADWIN RESD: $18,796 · OtherCLARE GLADWIN RESDCRISIS CENTER INC: $104,924 · Human ServicesCRISIS CENTER INCMID MICHIGAN BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $95,813 · Human ServicesMID MICHIGAN BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERSCOUNCIL ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & SEXUAL ASSAULT: $36,092 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & SEXUAL …TEN SIXTEEN RECOVERY NETWORK: $85,667 · HealthTEN SIXTEEN R…WOMEN'S AID SERVICE INC: $47,978 · Crime & LegalWOMEN'S AID …Northern MI Mobile Child Advocacy Center: $29,155 · Crime & LegalNorthern MI …MID-MICHIGAN INDUSTRIES INC: $45,677 · EmploymentFood Bank of Eastern Michigan: $9,000 · Food & Nutrition211 Northeast Michigan: $5,900 · Community Improvement
Other$244,069Human Services$236,829Health$85,667Crime & Legal$77,133Employment$45,677Food & Nutrition$9,000Community Improvement$5,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMID MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $199,942 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetCRISIS CENTER INC: $104,924 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMID MICHIGAN BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $95,813 over 9y, 14% of budgetTEN SIXTEEN RECOVERY NETWORK: $85,667 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetWOMEN'S AID SERVICE INC: $47,978 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetMID-MICHIGAN INDUSTRIES INC: $45,677 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCOUNCIL ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & SEXUAL ASSAULT: $36,092 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetNorthern MI Mobile Child Advocacy Center: $29,155 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetGirls on the Run of Central Michigan: $25,331 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetFood Bank of Eastern Michigan: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget211 Northeast Michigan: $5,900 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MID MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MID MICHIGAN BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ↗
  • Who funds TEN SIXTEEN RECOVERY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S AID SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds MID-MICHIGAN INDUSTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & SEXUAL ASSAULT ↗
  • Who funds Northern MI Mobile Child Advocacy Center ↗
  • Who funds Girls on the Run of Central Michigan ↗
  • Who funds Food Bank of Eastern Michigan ↗
  • Who funds 211 Northeast Michigan ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Midland Area Community FoundationMI28.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Midland Area Community Foundation · The Herbert H & Grace a Dow Foundation · United Way of Midland County · United Way of Greater Central Michigan · Mt Pleasant Area Community Fnd · Rollin M Gerstacker Foundation · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Clare County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Clare County. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $179k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Clare County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph