Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Brown County

To raise and accept donations for charitable purposes, distribute funds to charitable organizations in our community.

$230k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$216k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$231kHuman Services$30kHousing & Shelter$23kHealth$14kReligion$14kFood & Nutrition$13kYouth Development$11kRecreation & Sports$8k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $216,231 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $229,651 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $13,420 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$216,231
Median grant
1
States reached
$87k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS$216,231
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MT STERLING COMM CENTER YMCA: $30k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
West Central Community Action

In partnership with state and federal government, our mission is to administer programs designed to help residents in our 10-county region of southwest iowa achieve self-sufficiency.

Human Services
2
West Community Credit Union

To be our members' lifelong financial partner by truly understanding their stories and delivering smart solutions.

3
United Way of Central Illinois Inc

The united way of central illinois, inc. is a not-for-profit corporation with a mission to improve lives by uniting our community to adress the basic needs, education, financial stability and health of every person. vision: building…

Philanthropy
4
West Central Child Care Connection Inc

Resource & referral child care

Human Services
5
Central County United Way

Central County United Way connects people, resources and ideas to create a thriving community characterized by productive youth programs, senior services, healthy people and the community in which we live.

Philanthropy
6
United Way of North Central Iowa

Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…

Philanthropy
7
Illinois Valley Ymca

To put christian principles into practice that build a healthy spirit, mind, and body for all.

Human Services
8
United Way of Green County Inc

Building a stronger community by uniting people and resources to solve problems and improve lives.

Human Services
9
Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Illinois Capital Region Inc

To help children reach their full potential through life-changing, professionally supported, one-to-one mentoring relationships.

10
West Central Initiative

Serving to improve west central minnesota through funding, programs, and technical assistance. vision of a vibrant, inclusive, and sustainable world starts here in west central minnesota.

Philanthropy
11
Western Illinois Regional Council - Community Action Agency

Western illinois regional council's mission is to partner with people and communities to improve lives and neighborhoods.

Education
12
United Way of South Central Illinois

To solicit, collect, and otherwise raise money from the citizens of washington, marion, jefferson, franklin, hamilton, wayne, white, edwards, and wabash counties in southern illinois for charitable, philanthropic, and benevolent purposes.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Men's Christian Association of West Central Illinois and the most unlike its peers is West Central Illinois Health Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF BROWN COUNTY — $216,231 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF BROWN COUNTYCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE QUINCY AREA — $15,250 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE QUINCY AREABROWN COUNTY MINISTERIUM — $13,774 · OtherBROWN COUNTY…BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF WEST CENTRAL ILLINOIS — $10,632 · OtherBIG BROTHERS…BROWN COUNTY FOOD BASKET — $7,447 · OtherBROWN COUNTY…SCHUYLER COUNTY FOOD BASKET — $6,000 · OtherSCHUYLER COU…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WEST CENTRAL ILLINOIS — $30,148 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN…THE TWO RIVERS COUNCIL FOUNDATION — $23,244 · Housing & ShelterWest Central Illinois Health Corporation — $7,463 · HealthFAMILY CARE & PREGNANCY CENTER — $6,667 · HealthLITTLE LEAGUE INTERNATIONAL — $7,680 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$231,481Other$37,853Human Services$30,148Housing & Shelter$23,244Health$14,130Recreation & Sports$7,680

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WEST CENTRAL ILLINOIS — $30,148 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE TWO RIVERS COUNCIL FOUNDATION — $23,244 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE QUINCY AREA — $15,250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF WEST CENTRAL ILLINOIS — $10,632 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetLITTLE LEAGUE INTERNATIONAL — $7,680 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWest Central Illinois Health Corporation — $7,463 over 1y, 78% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of Brown County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to United Way of Brown County?

    Find your warmest path to United Way of Brown County through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $236k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph