Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of 1000 Lakes

United way's mission is to improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of itasca-area communities.

$145k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$361kYouth Development$258kHealth$187kHousing & Shelter$107kFood & Nutrition$72kScience & Tech$38kEducation$30kCommunity Improvement$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 11 grants below total $120,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $144,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $24,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$327k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SMART NORTH$20,000
ITASCA COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$15,000
ITASCA COUNTY FAMILY YMCA$15,000
ITASCA YOUTH FOR CHRIST$10,000
ADVOCATES FOR FAMILY PEACE$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHLAND$10,000
SUPPORT WITHIN REACH$10,000
GRACE HOUSE$10,000
PROJECT CARE FREE CLINIC$7,500
PROJECT READ$7,500
FIRST CALL$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $370k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ITASCA COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $24k → 11%ITASCA COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $22k → 11%ITASCA COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $22k → 11%ITASCA CTY YMCA: $22k → 11%ITASCA COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $21k → 11%ELDERCIRCLE: $21k → 11%ELDERCIRCLE: $19k → 11%ELDERCIRCLE: $19k → 11%ELDERCIRCLE: $19k → 11%ELDERCIRCLE: $18k → 11%ITASCA COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $15k → 11%ITASCA COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $15k → 11%ADVOCATES FOR FAMILY PEACE: $14k → 11%ADVOCATES FOR FAMILY PEACE: $14k → 11%ADVOCATES FOR FAMILY P: $13k → 11%ADVOCATES FOR FAMILY PEACE: $10k → 11%ADVOCATES FOR FAMILY PEACE: $10k → 11%GRACE HOUSE: $10k → 11%ADVOCATES FOR FAMILY PEACE: $10k → 11%GRACE HOUSE: $10k → 11%GRACE HOUSE: $10k → 11%ADVOCATES FOR FAMILY PEACE: $10k → 11%GRACE HOUSE: $10k → 11%ITASCA COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $8k → 11%GRACE HOUSE: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 17 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
5

Total granted

$1.1M
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+9%

Still filing today

88%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    ITASCA COUNTY FAMILY YMCA INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $147k · revenue +59%
  • BC
    BOYS' CLUB OF DULUTH
    7× · 2018–2025 · $108k · revenue +25%
  • E
    ELDERCIRCLE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $96k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • I
    INITIATIVES
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • IA
    ITASCA AREA SCHOOLS COLLABORATIVE
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • SW
    SUPPORT WITHIN REACH
    one grant, 2017 · $11k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Care in Action Minnesota

Our mission is to enhance the quality of life of children who have experienced abuse or neglect, strengthen families and prevent childhood maltreatment, by providing timely crucial support that meets the basic needs of local families and…

Human Services
2
Arc Northland

To promote and protect the rights of people with disabilities and their families while supporting inclusion and participation in the community throughout their lifetime.

3
Minnesota Chapter of the National Childrens Alliance

The Minnesota Children's Alliance leads the development and growth of locally based children's advocacy centers and multidisciplinary teams to ensure equitable access to services for healing and growth.

Crime & Legal
4
United Way of North Central Iowa

Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…

Philanthropy
5
Violence Free Minnesota

To represent victim/survivors of relationship abuse and member programs; challenge systems and institutions; promote social change; and support, educate, and connect member programs.

6
Minnesota Recovery Connection

Minnesota Recovery Connection's mission is to strengthen the recovery community through peer-to-peer support, public education and advocacy.

Human Services
7
Community Resource Connections Inc

Improving access to and the effectiveness of services through facilitation and coordination of community services and provision of information and referral services.

Community Improvement
8
Area Neighborhood Service Center Inc

The Service Center offers a variety of programs including but not limited to: emergency food shelf and food commodities programs for mothers with small children and seniors; monthly supplemental food programs for seniors and the disabled;…

9
Family Promise in Anoka County

Family Promise in Anoka County (FPAC) empowers families experiencing housing insecurity to build a foundation of lasting independence.

Human Services
10
Minnesota Voice

Minnesota Voice is a collaboration of organizations working toward permanent change in social, racial, and economic justice by increasing civic engagement and voter participation across the state.

Public Benefit
11
World Youth Connect

World Youth Connect builds communities across cultures and beyond borders. By creating and encouraging civic engagement opportunities we help young people gain the skills and experience they need to be successful. World Youth Connect…

Youth Development
12
South Central Minnesota Youth for Christ Inc

Reaching out to young people everywhere to raise up life-long followers of Jesus who lead by their godliness in lifestyle, devotion to the Word of God and prayer, passion for sharing the love of Christ, and commitment to social involvement.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Itasca County Family Ymca Inc and the most unlike its peers is Itasca County Habitat for Humanity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
16/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ITASCA COUNTY FAMILY YMCA INC — $147,416 · Human ServicesITASCA COUNTY FAMILY YMCA INCELDERCIRCLE — $96,301 · Human ServicesELDERCIRCLEAdvocates for Family Peace — $79,883 · Human ServicesAdvocates for Family PeaceGRACE HOUSE OF ITASCA COUNTY — $46,284 · Human ServicesGRACE HOUSE OF ITASCA COUNTYSECOND HARVEST NORTH CENTRAL FOOD BANK — $71,928 · OtherSECOND HARVEST NORTH CENTRAL…Itasca County Habitat for Humanity — $60,500 · OtherItasca County Habitat for Hu…KOOTASCA COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $37,223 · OtherKOOTASCA COMMUNITY ACTION IN…Northland Counseling Center Inc — $24,068 · OtherNorthland Counseling Center …INITIATIVES — $19,764 · OtherINITIATIVESItasca County Land Dept — $19,203 · OtherItasca County Land DeptITASCA AREA SCHOOLS COLLABORATIVE — $15,000 · OtherITASCA AREA SCHOOLS COLLABOR…ISD #318 — $15,000 · OtherISD #318SUPPORT WITHIN REACH — $10,575 · Other+1 more — $6,000 · OtherBOYS' CLUB OF DULUTH — $107,708 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS' CLUB OF DULUTHITASCA YOUTH FOR CHRIST — $69,900 · Youth DevelopmentITASCA YOUTH FOR CHRISTBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LEECH LAKE AREA INC — $65,298 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE…Minnesota Alliance With Youth — $9,000 · Youth DevelopmentSUPPORT WITHIN REACH — $70,650 · HealthSUPPORT WITHIN …PROJECT CARE FREE CLINIC — $64,084 · HealthPROJECT CARE FR…FIRST CALL FOR HELP OF ITASCA COUNTY — $22,000 · HealthFIRST CALL FOR …SMART NORTH — $57,500 · Science & TechGRAND RAPIDS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $8,567 · Community Improvement
Human Services$369,884Other$279,261Youth Development$251,906Health$156,734Science & Tech$57,500Community Improvement$8,567

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetITASCA COUNTY FAMILY YMCA INC — $147,416 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetBOYS' CLUB OF DULUTH — $107,708 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetELDERCIRCLE — $96,301 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetAdvocates for Family Peace — $79,883 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetSECOND HARVEST NORTH CENTRAL FOOD BANK — $71,928 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSUPPORT WITHIN REACH — $70,650 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetITASCA YOUTH FOR CHRIST — $69,900 over 7y, 7.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LEECH LAKE AREA INC — $65,298 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetPROJECT CARE FREE CLINIC — $64,084 over 8y, 7.4% of budgetItasca County Habitat for Humanity — $60,500 over 5y, 5.2% of budgetSMART NORTH — $57,500 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetGRACE HOUSE OF ITASCA COUNTY — $46,284 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetKOOTASCA COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $37,223 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNorthland Counseling Center Inc — $24,068 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST CALL FOR HELP OF ITASCA COUNTY — $22,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMinnesota Alliance With Youth — $9,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $8,567 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBRIDGES KINSHIP MENTORING — $6,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ITASCA COUNTY FAMILY YMCA INC
  • Who funds BOYS' CLUB OF DULUTH
  • Who funds ELDERCIRCLE
  • Who funds Advocates for Family Peace
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST NORTH CENTRAL FOOD BANK
  • Who funds SUPPORT WITHIN REACH
  • Who funds ITASCA YOUTH FOR CHRIST
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LEECH LAKE AREA INC
  • Who funds PROJECT CARE FREE CLINIC
  • Who funds Itasca County Habitat for Humanity
  • Who funds SMART NORTH
  • Who funds GRACE HOUSE OF ITASCA COUNTY
  • Who funds KOOTASCA COMMUNITY ACTION INC
  • Who funds Northland Counseling Center Inc
  • Who funds FIRST CALL FOR HELP OF ITASCA COUNTY
  • Who funds Minnesota Alliance With Youth
  • Who funds GRAND RAPIDS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BRIDGES KINSHIP MENTORING

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Rapids Area Community FoundationMN39× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Rapids Area Community Foundation · Northland Foundation · C K Blandin Foundation · Minnesota Power Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Second Harvest Northland · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Second Harvest North Central Food Bank · Mardag Foundation · Deer River Healthcare Center Inc · United Way of Ne Minnesota · Smdc Medical Center

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of 1000 Lakes funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph