· Public charity
United Way and Volunteer Services of Greater Yankt
To promote voluntary giving and services, support human needs, help children succeed, improve education, promote financial stability and empower healthy living in the greater yankton community
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $347,545 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $430,158 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $82,613 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $46k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $78k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $224k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RIVER CITY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER | $96,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF YANKTON | $64,000 |
| PATHWAYS SHELTER | $64,000 |
| YANKTON TRANSIT | $44,000 |
| YANKTON FOOD FOR THOUGHT | $22,000 |
| SOUTHEAST CASA | $12,000 |
| CORNERSTONE CAREER CENTER | $9,750 |
| SERVANTS HEART CLINIC | $8,750 |
| YANKTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $7,600 |
| LEWIS & CLARK BEHAVIORAL | $6,973 |
| YANKTON AREA ARTS ASSOCIATION | $6,972 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF YANKTON COU | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $429k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against -20% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCONTACT-REFERRAL CENTER FOR HUMAN RESOURCES5× · 2020–2024 · $456k · revenue +77% · 52% of their budget
- RCRIVER CITY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER5× · 2020–2024 · $333k · revenue +23%
- YTYankton Transit Inc dba Southeast Public Transit5× · 2020–2024 · $207k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- SCSIOUX COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INCone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -20%
- YTYANKTON THRIVE INC2× · 2022–2023 · $5k · revenue -39%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We are a state licensed substance abuse facility which functions to provide a clinically managed residence treatment center for women and women with children.
Promote economic growth in the community through leadership, support, and service to our members.
To empower victims of domestic and sexual violence and abuse by providing safe shelter options and supportive advocacy services including 24-hour crisis help line, information and referral, court support, and support groups.
To empower people living in the big horn basin of wyoming to enhance health and employment status, overcome obsticales, and end economic hardship.
To encourage and promote quality economic growth in york county
Independent living arrangements: a supportive housing opportunity is provided for elderely persons to live independently which otherwise would require institutional care.
To improve the quality and quantity of housing in yates county.
Pathway's mission is to serve the immediate needs of individuals and families experiencing homelessness within the yankton area while engaging partners in developing long term solutions.
The Yadkin Valley Chamber of Commerce is an organization that promotes a positive business environment, community betterment and supports economic development
Provide quality care and services to residents in assisted living and nursing home facilities.
To provide training and assistance to shelters for victims of domestic violence and sexual assault.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yankton Thrive Inc and the most unlike its peers is Family Education and Counseling Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CONTACT-REFERRAL CENTER FOR HUMAN RESOURCES ↗
- Who funds RIVER CITY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE MISSOURI RIVER AREA ↗
- Who funds Yankton Transit Inc dba Southeast Public Transit ↗
- Who funds YANKTON AREA SENIOR CITIZEN ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST CASA PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds SERVANT HEARTS CLINIC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF YANKTON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds YANKTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds FAMILY EDUCATION AND COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Cornerstones Career Learning Center ↗
- Who funds EMBE ↗
- Who funds LEWIS AND CLARK BEHAVIORAL ↗
- Who funds Yankton Area Arts Association ↗
- Who funds SIOUX COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds YANKTON THRIVE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: South Dakota Community Foundation · Avera Health · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Mike Cindy and Kylie Huether Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way and Volunteer Services of Greater Yankt funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.