Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United States of America Rugby Football Union Ltd

To develop and administer the sport of rugby in the united states to the highest international standards and to represent the interests of the united states in the world rugby community.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$95k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Recreation & Sports$611kYouth Development$44kHousing & Shelter$31kHealth$25k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $165,851 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,608,508 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,442,657 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$94,601
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IMAGINE RUGBY INC$94,601
USA YOUTH AND HIGH SCHOOL RUGBY$71,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 46% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%USA RUGBY TOUCH: $10k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA STATE ATHLETIC CONFERENCE: $5k → 13%LET'S PLAY RUGBY: $44k → 8%PLAYWORKS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $58k → 10%INSTITUTE OF RUGBY: $5k → 11%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION: $8k → 14%URBAN RUGBY: $7k → 14%NORTHERN CALIFORNIA RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION: $6k → 19%PLAY RUGBY USA: $58k → 17%US WOMEN'S RUGBY FOUNDATION: $47k → 16%USA YOUTH AND HIGH SCHOOL RUGBY: $71k → 14%GIRLS RUGBY INC: $8k → 12%NATIONAL INTERCOLLEGIATE RUGBY ASSOCIATION: $7k → 14%IMAGINE RUGBY INC: $128k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $25k → 9%NATIONAL SMALL COLLEGE RUGBY ORGANIZATION: $25k → 7%USA YOUTH AND HIGH SCHOOL RUGBY: $19k → 14%GIRLS RUGBY INC: $6k → 12%IMAGINE RUGBY INC: $95k → 8%NATIONAL SMALL COLLEGE RUGBY ORGANIZATION: $30k → 7%NATIONAL SMALL COLLEGE RUGBY ORGANIZATION: $20k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
OR
PA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
AZ
NC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 78% of United States of America Rugby Football Union Ltd’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

United States of America Rugby Football Union Ltdlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 74% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$376k · 4 repeat orgs$335k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +324% since the first grant, against -22% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
14

Total granted

$376k
$335k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+324%
-22%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’23’24
Recreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UY
    USA YOUTH AND HIGH SCHOOL RUGBY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $90k · revenue +4%
  • NC
    NATIONAL COLLEGIATE RUGBY ORGANIZATION INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $50k · revenue ×15
  • GR
    Girls Rugby Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $14k · revenue +324%

Funded once

  • PR
    PLAY RUGBY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $58k · revenue -33%
  • PE
    PLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED
    one grant, 2018 · $58k · revenue -22%
  • US
    United States Womens Rugby Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $47k · revenue -56%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Scyr Inc

To govern youth and high school rugby in Southern California, including organizing and running league competitions and tournaments, promoting the continued growth of the game through outreach and education, and prioritizing the safety and…

Recreation & Sports
2
Usa Rugby Charitable Foundation Dba Usa Rugby Trust

To support, promote, develop and grow the sport of rugby at all levels in the united states by providing financial support to usa rugby.

3
United States of America Rugby Football Union Ltd

To develop and administer the sport of rugby in the united states to the highest international standards and to represent the interests of the united states in the world rugby community.

4
Herriman Rugby
Philanthropy
5
Raleigh Rugby Football Club Inc

To foster local, regional, national and international amateur sports competition in rugby union football, including conducting such competitions, and to support and develop amateur athletes for such competitions.

Recreation & Sports
6
Charles River Rugby United Inc

Foster national or international amateur sports - rugby

Recreation & Sports
7
Albany Knickerbocker Rugby Football Club Inc

The Albany Knickerbockers Rugby Football Club was established in 1973. Building off a strong foundation begun by the clubs founders, the club eventually advanced to field a competitive Division I Men's side. The success of the club…

Recreation & Sports
8
Washington Youth Rugby

To provide a safe an inclusive environment for youth rugby players to play rugby in Washington State.

Recreation & Sports
9
Portland Rugby Football Club

To foster and promote the sport of rugby in Maine New England and the US through launching and supporting youth and high school programs and teams fielding competitive womens and mens teams in local regional national and international…

Recreation & Sports
10
Sbro New Jersey

The purpose of Rugby New Jersey is to promote the growth and development of the game of Rugby by providing support to NJ rugby clubs and developing participation in the sport by boys and girls across the state of NJ. It will further…

Recreation & Sports
11
Santa Barbara Rugby Association

The Santa Barbara Rugby Association is organized to provide coaching, promote the development of rugby skills and sportsmanship, and encourage youth and amateur athletic competition. There were over 270 players who participated in…

12
Santa Clara Youth Rugby

Silicon Valley Rugby Football Club SVRFC is rugby program based in San Jose California and the surrounding areas. SVRFC's stated mission is encourage and grow the sport of rugby in the Silicon Valley and surrounding areas. SVRFC was…

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Play Rugby Inc and the most unlike its peers is Global Communities of Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

IMAGINE RUGBY INC — $222,247 · Youth DevelopmentIMAGINE RUGBY INCPLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED — $57,740 · Youth DevelopmentPLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZEDUSA YOUTH AND HIGH SCHOOL RUGBY — $90,000 · Recreation & SportsUSA YOUTH AND HIGH SCHOOL RUGBYPLAY RUGBY INC — $57,740 · Recreation & SportsPLAY RUGBY INCNATIONAL COLLEGIATE RUGBY ORGANIZATION INC — $50,000 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL COLLEGIATE RUGBY ORGANIZATION INCUnited States Womens Rugby Foundation Inc — $46,973 · Recreation & SportsUnited States Womens Rugby Foundation IncGirls Rugby Inc — $14,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $7,000 · Recreation & SportsLET'S PLAY RUGBY — $44,000 · OtherLET'S PLAY RUGBYUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHIN…NATIONAL SMALL COLLEGE RUGBY ORGANIZATION — $25,000 · OtherNATIONAL SMALL COLLE…USA TOUCH — $10,000 · OtherUSA TOUCHSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION — $7,500 · OtherSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA …URBAN RUGBY — $7,000 · OtherURBAN RUGBYNorthern California Rugby Football — $6,000 · OtherINSTITUTE OF RUGBY — $5,000 · OtherGLOBAL COMMUNITIES OF HOPE — $30,920 · Human ServicesPENNSYLVANIA STATE ATHLETIC CONFERENCE — $5,000 · Education
Youth Development$279,987Recreation & Sports$265,713Other$129,500Human Services$30,920Education$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUSA YOUTH AND HIGH SCHOOL RUGBY — $90,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetPLAY RUGBY INC — $57,740 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetPLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED — $57,740 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL COLLEGIATE RUGBY ORGANIZATION INC — $50,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetGLOBAL COMMUNITIES OF HOPE — $30,920 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetGirls Rugby Inc — $14,000 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION — $7,500 over 1y, 13% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA STATE ATHLETIC CONFERENCE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE4.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United States of America Rugby Football Union Ltd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph