· Public charity
United States Health & Housing
The UNITED STATES HEALTH & HOUSING foundation, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $195,675 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $226,975 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $31,300 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $188k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHEAST AL | $30,000 |
| OZARK-DALE COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY | $30,000 |
| OZARK-DALE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY | $30,000 |
| TENNESSEE RIVERKEEPERS | $27,500 |
| WIREGRASS AVIATION SUPPORT PROGRAM | $20,000 |
| DALE CO SHERIFFS AVIATION UNIT | $15,000 |
| VIVIAN B ADAMS SCHOOL | $15,000 |
| SHELBY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| LIBERTY IN NORTH KOREA | $10,000 |
| OTHER ORGANIZATIONS EACH 5000 | $8,175 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 95% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against -16% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LGLINK GLOBAL5× · 2021–2025 · $190k · revenue +5%
- ODOZARK DALE COUNTY LIBRARY INC4× · 2021–2025 · $120k · revenue +54%
- ODOZARK DALE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY5× · 2021–2025 · $110k · revenue +44% · 31% of their budget
Funded once
- DCDALE COUNTY SHERIFFS AVIATION UNITone grant, 2021 · $30k
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INCone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -16%
- ODOZARK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETYone grant, 2024 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Local humane society animal shelter and animal rescue.
The kershaw county humane society is dedicated to providing food, housing and medical care to all lost or homeless animals. our goal is to reunite pets with their owners and to address the root causes of animal abuse and overpopulation…
Heartland humane society is a no-kill shelter for dogs and cats. the mission is to provide temporary shelter and care to homeless/lost animals, to educate the public on proper care of animals, and to promote neuter and spay programs.
To provide food, shelter, and vet services for stray, unwanted, and terminally ill animals in the warren county and vicksburg area.
To facilitate a no-kill solution for shelters and strays in the wiregrass area.
To Provide a safe place for animals and unite them with permanent homes
The Mission Statement for the Okmulgee County Humane Society is to enrich the lives of dogs and cats and provide support to the people who love them when in need - strengthen the overall human-animal bond.
Care for abandoned animals in vernon and wilbarger county, tx including spay, neuter, adoption and education.
To improve the qulity of life for companion animals, to place homeless cats & dogs in suitable homes, & to provide programs to reduce the overpopulation and euthanasia of companion animals.
We are dedicated to providing education and services to ottawa county and beyond, to enforce animal cruelty laws, and help turn the many homeless pets at our shelter into loving family members in "furever" homes.
The mission of harley's haven dog rescue is to provide the public with education concerning the need to adopt a homeless pet as opposed to buying one from a pet shop, the responsibility of pet ownership, and special needs of homeless and…
Provide care for abandoned animals, including shelter, food and medical care in order to adopt them out to the public.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of Southeast Alabama Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wiregrass Aviation Support Program. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LINK GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds TENNESSEE RIVERKEEPER ↗
- Who funds OZARK DALE COUNTY LIBRARY INC ↗
- Who funds OZARK DALE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHEAST ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds VIVIAN B ADAMS SCHOOL BOARD ↗
- Who funds WIREGRASS AVIATION SUPPORT PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SHELBY COUNTY ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United States Health & Housing funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to United States Health & Housing?
Find your warmest path to United States Health & Housing through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.