Skip to content

· Public charity

United States Health & Housing

The UNITED STATES HEALTH & HOUSING foundation, inc.

$227k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$195kInternational$190kAnimals$145kEnvironment$128kPublic Safety & Disaster$106kYouth Development$90kCrime & Legal$45kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $195,675, the rows itemized in this filing. The $226,975 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $31,300 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $188k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OZARK-DALE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$30,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHEAST AL$30,000
OZARK-DALE COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY$30,000
TENNESSEE RIVERKEEPERS$27,500
WIREGRASS AVIATION SUPPORT PROGRAM$20,000
VIVIAN B ADAMS SCHOOL$15,000
DALE CO SHERIFFS AVIATION UNIT$15,000
LIBERTY IN NORTH KOREA$10,000
SHELBY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$10,000
OTHER ORGANIZATIONS EACH 5000$8,175
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LIBERTY IN NORTH KOREA: $60k → 14%SHELBY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $15k → 7%ROCKY RIDGE FIRE DISTRICT: $14k → 16%NEWTON POLICE DEPARTMENT: $8k → 17%OZARK-DALE COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $30k → 21%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 22%LIBERTY IN NORTH KOREA: $60k → 14%SHELBY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $10k → 7%ROCKY RIDGE FIRE DISTRICT: $8k → 16%NEWTON POLICE DEPARTMENT: $6k → 17%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHEAST AL: $30k → 21%LIBERTY IN NORTH KOREA: $30k → 14%SHELBY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $10k → 7%OZARK-DALE COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $30k → 21%LIBERTY IN NORTH KOREA: $30k → 14%OZARK-DALE COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $30k → 21%LIBERTY IN NORTH KOREA: $10k → 14%OZARK-DALE COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $30k → 21%OZARK-DALE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $30k → 21%DALE COUNTY SHERIFFS AVIATION UNIT: $30k → 21%OZARK-DALE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $25k → 21%OZARK-DALE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $25k → 21%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHEAST AL: $15k → 21%VIVIAN B ADAMS SCHOOL: $15k → 21%VIVIAN B ADAMS SCHOOL: $15k → 21%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHEAST AL: $15k → 21%VIVIAN B ADAMS SCHOOL: $15k → 21%VIVIAN B ADAMS SCHOOL: $15k → 21%OZARK-DALE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $15k → 21%OZARK-DALE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $15k → 21%DALE CO SHERIFFS AVIATION UNIT: $15k → 21%VIVIAN B ADAMS SCHOOL: $15k → 21%DALE CO SHERIFFS AVIATION UNIT: $15k → 21%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHEAST AL: $15k → 21%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF OZARK: $15k → 21%OZARK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY: $10k → 21%OTHER ORGANIZATIONS EACH 5000: $8k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$872k · 11 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against -16% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$872k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
-16%

Still filing today

73%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalAnimalsEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentHealthPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LG
    LINK GLOBAL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $190k · revenue +5%
  • OD
    OZARK DALE COUNTY LIBRARY INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $120k · revenue +54%
  • OD
    OZARK DALE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $110k · revenue +44% · 31% of their budget

Funded once

  • DC
    DALE COUNTY SHERIFFS AVIATION UNIT
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -16%
  • OD
    OZARK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Heber Springs Humane Society

Local humane society animal shelter and animal rescue.

Animals
2
Kershaw County Humane Society

The kershaw county humane society is dedicated to providing food, housing and medical care to all lost or homeless animals. our goal is to reunite pets with their owners and to address the root causes of animal abuse and overpopulation…

Animals
3
Heartland Humane Society Ltd

Heartland humane society is a no-kill shelter for dogs and cats. the mission is to provide temporary shelter and care to homeless/lost animals, to educate the public on proper care of animals, and to promote neuter and spay programs.

Animals
4
Vicksburg-Warren Humane Society

To provide food, shelter, and vet services for stray, unwanted, and terminally ill animals in the warren county and vicksburg area.

Animals
5
Wiregrass Animal Group Inc

To facilitate a no-kill solution for shelters and strays in the wiregrass area.

Animals
6
West Plains Regional Animal Shelter

To Provide a safe place for animals and unite them with permanent homes

Animals
7
Okmulgee County Humane Society

The Mission Statement for the Okmulgee County Humane Society is to enrich the lives of dogs and cats and provide support to the people who love them when in need - strengthen the overall human-animal bond.

Unclassified
8
Wilbarger Humane Society

Care for abandoned animals in vernon and wilbarger county, tx including spay, neuter, adoption and education.

Animals
9
Humane Society of Richland Wilkin Co

To improve the qulity of life for companion animals, to place homeless cats & dogs in suitable homes, & to provide programs to reduce the overpopulation and euthanasia of companion animals.

Animals
10
Humane Society of Ottawa County

We are dedicated to providing education and services to ottawa county and beyond, to enforce animal cruelty laws, and help turn the many homeless pets at our shelter into loving family members in "furever" homes.

Animals
11
Harley's Haven Dog Rescue

The mission of harley's haven dog rescue is to provide the public with education concerning the need to adopt a homeless pet as opposed to buying one from a pet shop, the responsibility of pet ownership, and special needs of homeless and…

Animals
12
Hazels House Rescue

Provide care for abandoned animals, including shelter, food and medical care in order to adopt them out to the public.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of Southeast Alabama Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wiregrass Aviation Support Program. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OZARK DALE COUNTY LIBRARY INC: $120,050 · OtherOZARK DALE COUNTY LIBRARY IN…DALE COUNTY SHERIFFS AVIATION UNIT: $30,000 · OtherDALE COUNTY SHERIFFS AVIATIO…DALE CO SHERIFFS AVIATION UNIT: $30,000 · OtherDALE CO SHERIFFS AVIATION UN…ROCKY RIDGE FIRE DISTRICT: $21,000 · OtherROCKY RIDGE FIRE DISTRICTIndividual grant recipient: $13,741 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOZARK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY: $10,000 · OtherOTHER ORGANIZATIONS EACH 5000: $8,175 · OtherLINK GLOBAL: $190,000 · InternationalLINK GLOBALHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 · InternationalOZARK DALE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $110,000 · AnimalsOZARK DALE COUNTY…HUMANE SOCIETY OF SHELBY COUNTY: $35,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF…TENNESSEE RIVERKEEPER: $127,500 · EnvironmentTENNESSEE RIVER…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHEAST ALABAMA INC: $90,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIR…VIVIAN B ADAMS SCHOOL BOARD: $75,000 · HealthVIVIAN B …WIREGRASS AVIATION SUPPORT PROGRAM: $60,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$232,966International$200,000Animals$145,000Environment$127,500Youth Development$90,000Health$75,000Public Safety & Disaster$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLINK GLOBAL: $190,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetTENNESSEE RIVERKEEPER: $127,500 over 5y, 18% of budgetOZARK DALE COUNTY LIBRARY INC: $120,050 over 4y, 9.2% of budgetOZARK DALE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $110,000 over 5y, 31% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHEAST ALABAMA INC: $90,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetVIVIAN B ADAMS SCHOOL BOARD: $75,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetWIREGRASS AVIATION SUPPORT PROGRAM: $60,000 over 2y, 88% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SHELBY COUNTY: $35,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LINK GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds TENNESSEE RIVERKEEPER ↗
  • Who funds OZARK DALE COUNTY LIBRARY INC ↗
  • Who funds OZARK DALE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHEAST ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds VIVIAN B ADAMS SCHOOL BOARD ↗
  • Who funds WIREGRASS AVIATION SUPPORT PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SHELBY COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United States Health & Housing funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United States Health & Housing. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to United States Health & Housing?

    Find your warmest path to United States Health & Housing through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United States Health & Housing’s filings →

    More from the funding graph