Skip to content
United States Cancer Pain Relief Committee Inc at a glance

· Public charity

United States Cancer Pain Relief Committee Inc

Promote education and researchfor (cancer) pain relief and palliative care.

$15k
Granted FY2021
1
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Health$1.4MInternational$200k
02FY2021 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $8,618, the rows itemized in this filing. The $14,618 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $6,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$8,618
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE$8,618
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDRENS HOSPITALS & CLINICS OF MINNESOTA: $75k → 11%MJHS FOUNDATION: $100k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $53k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MIAMA: $150k → 15%CENTER FOR PRACTICAL BIOETHICS: $150k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $9k → 8%AMERICAN ACADEMY OF HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE MEDICINE: $75k → 14%US ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF PAIN: $60k → 6%MJHS FOUNDATION: $100k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $14k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $9k → 8%MJHS FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE: $150k → 16%ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $40k → 17%INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE: $150k → 16%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER-SLOAN KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER: $9k → 17%INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE: $100k → 16%WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $9k → 17%INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE: $50k → 16%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER-SLOAN KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER: $9k → 17%INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE: $9k → 16%WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $9k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
UT
MO
MD
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 7 repeat orgs$550k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2021, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$1.0M
$550k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+41%

Still filing today

57%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
HealthInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IA
    INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $459k · revenue -42% · 31% of their budget
  • MJ
    METROPOLITAN JEWISH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2020 · $250k · revenue +26%
  • HR
    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $200k · revenue -66%

Funded once

  • CF
    CENTER FOR PRACTICAL BIOETHICS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $150k · revenue -14%
  • UO
    University of Miamigraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $150k · revenue +87%
  • AA
    AMERICAN ACADEMY OF HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE MEDICINE
    one grant, 2019 · $75k · revenue -14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
2
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
3
American Association of Physicists in Medicine

Advancing medicine through excellence in the science, education and professional practice of medical physics. the mission is carried out through driving scientific and clinical innovation in medical physics to improve human health,…

Science & Tech
4
University of Maryland Pediatric Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
5
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
6
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
7
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
8
University of Maryland Surgical Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
9
American College of Physicians Inc

The mission of the american college of physicians (acp), www. acponline.org, is to enhance the quality and effectiveness of health care by fostering excellence and professionalism in the practice of medicine. acp was founded in 1915 to…

Health
10
University of Maryland Obstetrical Andgynecological Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
11
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
12
University of Maryland Eye Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Metropolitan Jewish Health System Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Children's Health Care. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE INC: $458,618 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR HOSPICE AND PALLI…HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $200,000 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INCMETROPOLITAN JEWISH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $250,000 · HealthMETROPOLITAN JEWISH HEALTH S…CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE: $75,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTH CAREUNITED STATES ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF PAIN INC: $60,000 · HealthUNITED STATES ASSOCIATION FO…MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $17,600 · HealthCENTER FOR PRACTICAL BIOETHICS INC: $150,000 · OtherCENTER FOR PRACTICAL BI…AMERICAN ACADEMY OF HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE MEDICINE: $75,000 · OtherAMERICAN ACADEMY OF HOS…UTMD ANDERSON: $66,480 · OtherUTMD ANDERSONWeill Medical College of Cornell Univers: $17,600 · OtherWeill Medical College o…UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $17,600 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHUniversity of Miami: $150,000 · EducationUniversity of…ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $40,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL …
International$658,618Health$402,600Other$326,680Education$190,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE INC: $458,618 over 4y, 31% of budgetMETROPOLITAN JEWISH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $200,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE MEDICINE: $75,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $17,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United States Cancer Pain Relief Committee Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United States Cancer Pain Relief Committee Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • United States Association for the Study of Pain Inc: 5% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to United States Cancer Pain Relief Committee Inc?

Find your warmest path to United States Cancer Pain Relief Committee Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on United States Cancer Pain Relief Committee’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home