Skip to content

· Private foundation

United Engineering Foundation Inc Glenmade Trust Co

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$705k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$1.8MScience & Tech$1.0MArts & Culture$300kEnvironment$162kInternational$125kYouth Development$118kEmployment$100kCommunity Improvement$63kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$135,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WGBH EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$150,000
SOCIETY OF HISPANIC PROFESIONAL ENG$138,800
NATIONAL ENGINEERS WEEK FOUNDATION$135,500
SOCIETY OF AMERICAN MILITARY ENGINE$117,590
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS$100,163
AICHE FOUNDATION$63,318
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 37% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WGBH EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $150k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF VILLANOVA FOUNDATION: $65k → 10%TECHBRIDGE GIRLS: $41k → 10%SOCIETY OF HISPANIC PROFESIONAL ENG: $139k → 14%AIME: $100k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $120k → 10%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING FUN: $5k → 14%IEEE FOUNDATION: $177k → 8%AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: $117k → 6%NATIONAL SOCIETY OF BLACK ENGINEERS: $696k → 9%WGBH EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $150k → 16%SOCIETY OF HISPANIC PROFESIONAL ENG: $100k → 14%AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGI: $75k → 17%IEEE FOUNDATION: $65k → 8%AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: $100k → 6%NATIONAL ENGINEERS WEEK FOUNDATION: $136k → 9%USC - VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING: $119k → 14%THE ASME FOUNDATION INC: $62k → 17%AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: $50k → 6%NATIONAL ENGINEERS WEEK FOUNDATION: $125k → 9%AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL ENGI: $55k → 17%AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: $22k → 6%SOCIETY OF AMERICAN MILITARY ENGINE: $118k → 9%AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGI: $50k → 17%DISCOVER E: $216k → 6%NATIONAL ENGINEERS WEEK FOUNDATION: $116k → 9%THE ASME FOUNDATION INC: $48k → 17%NATIONAL SOCIETY OF BLACK ENGINEERS: $53k → 9%NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $180k → 17%COLUMBIA SIPA: $92k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
VA
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of United Engineering Foundation Inc Glenmade Trust Co’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

United Engineering Foundation Inc Glenmade Trust Colessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 9 repeat orgs$992k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

$2.7M
$874k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+11%

Still filing today

44%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $118k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationScience & TechArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    IEEE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $242k · revenue +18%
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF HISPANIC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS
    2× · 2022–2024 · $238k · revenue +37%
  • TA
    THE ASME FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $110k · revenue +174%

Funded once

  • DE
    DISCOVER E
    one grant, 2023 · $216k
  • NY
    NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
    one grant, 2020 · $180k · revenue +11%
  • THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $120k · revenue +88%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
2
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
3
Society for Science & the Public

Society for science is a champion for science, dedicated to expanding scientific literacy, effective stem education and scientific research.

Science & Tech
4
Association for Computing Machinery Inc

We are an intl. scientific & educational org. dedicated to advancing art, science & technology.

Science & Tech
5
New York Hall of Science

Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…

Arts & Culture
6
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
9
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
10
Girls in Stem
Human Services
11
Aip Foundation

The aip foundation is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, scientific, and educational purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the irs code 1986.

Science & Tech
12
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ieee Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wgbh Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL SOCIETY OF BLACK ENGINEERS: $748,870 · OtherNATIONAL SOCIETY OF BLACK ENGINEERSNATIONAL ENGINEERS WEEK FOUNDATION: $376,500 · OtherNATIONAL ENGINEERS WEEK FOUNDATIONAMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: $289,558 · OtherAMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERSAICHE FOUNDATION: $269,447 · OtherAICHE FOUNDATIONDISCOVER E: $216,400 · OtherDISCOVER ENEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $180,000 · OtherNEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCESAMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGI: $124,935 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $120,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF AMERICAN MILITARY ENGINE: $117,590 · OtherAIME INC: $100,000 · Other+4 more: $216,407 · Other+4 moreIEEE FOUNDATION INC: $242,055 · EducationIEEE FOUNDATION INCSOCIETY OF HISPANIC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS: $238,300 · EducationSOCIETY OF HISPANIC…UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $119,407 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH…Techbridge Girls: $41,158 · EducationTechbridge GirlsWGBH Educational Foundation: $300,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ASME FOUNDATION INC: $110,000 · Science & Tech
Other$2,759,707Education$640,920Arts & Culture$300,000Science & Tech$110,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWGBH Educational Foundation: $300,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIEEE FOUNDATION INC: $242,055 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSOCIETY OF HISPANIC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS: $238,300 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $180,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $120,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $119,407 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASME FOUNDATION INC: $110,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetTechbridge Girls: $41,158 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WGBH Educational Foundation ↗
  • Who funds IEEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF HISPANIC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds THE ASME FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Techbridge Girls ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC10.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Engineering Foundation Inc Glenmade Trust Co funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Engineering Foundation Inc Glenmade Trust Co. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Wgbh Educational Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to United Engineering Foundation Inc Glenmade Trust Co?

Find your warmest path to United Engineering Foundation Inc Glenmade Trust Co through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on United Engineering Foundation Inc Glenmade’s filings →

More from the funding graph