· Public charity
United Community Services of Johnson County Inc
The organization is a regional planning organization focused on improving health and human service access and delivery.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2018.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2018
- Under $10k3 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $237k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Catholic Charities of Northeast Kansas | $70,000 |
| Health Partnership Clinic of Johnson County | $42,000 |
| Casa of Johnson & Wyandotte Counties | $40,000 |
| Sunflower House | $37,500 |
| El Centro Inc | $20,000 |
| Safehome | $19,865 |
| Kansas Children's Service League | $19,800 |
| Salvation Army Family Lodge (Olathe Corps) | $18,000 |
| Kids TLC | $17,500 |
| Harvesters Community Food Network | $12,000 |
| The Family Conservancy | $10,000 |
| Growing Futures Early Education Center | $9,265 |
| Johnson County Interfaith Hospitality Network | $9,000 |
| Hillcrest Ministires of MidAmerica | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $97k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
13 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2018, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST KANSAS INC2× · 2017–2018 · $140k · revenue +24%
- HPHEALTH PARTNERSHIP CLINIC INC2× · 2017–2018 · $84k · revenue +10%
- COCASA OF JOHNSON & WYANDOTTE COUNTIES INC2× · 2017–2018 · $72k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- HMHILLCREST MINISTRIES OF MIDAMERICAgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue +150%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To assure the safety and well-being of children and to create heathly families by providing: assessment and intervention services; a temporary home for children at risk of abuse, neglect, or homelessness; education, prevention and advocacy…
To bring expert care, peace of mind, comfort, guidance and hope to people who are affected by serious illness or by grief.
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
To provide dynamic, culturally-sensitive, high quality behavioral healthcare to residents of chase, coffey, greenwood, lyon, morris, osage and wabaunsee counties in the most effective, caring and efficient manner.
Partnering for safe and healthy communities.
Family tree partners with all people to prevent and overcome the interconnected issues of child abuse, domestic violence and homelessness to promote safety, healing and stability across generations.
Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…
Walk with people facing violence, offering safety, support, and hope as they heal and rebuild. with every step forward, we build stronger, more resilient communities.
The mission of kc care health center is to promote health and wellness by providing quality care, access, research and education to the underserved and all people in our community.
It is the mission of kvc to enrich and enhance the lives of children and their families by providing medical and behavioral healthcare, social services and education.
The mission of healthcore clinic, inc is to provide quality family healthcare through improved access and a heightened and unrelenting focus on education and prevention.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safehome Inc and the most unlike its peers is Growing Futures Early Education Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST KANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTH PARTNERSHIP CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF JOHNSON & WYANDOTTE COUNTIES INC ↗
- Who funds SUNFLOWER HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds EL CENTRO INC ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CHILDRENS SERVICE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds SAFEHOME INC ↗
- Who funds KIDSTLC INC ↗
- Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds GROWING FUTURES EARLY EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JOCO IHN INC ↗
- Who funds HILLCREST MINISTRIES OF MIDAMERICA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · Menorah Heritage Foundation · Health Forward Foundation · John W and Effie E Speas Memorial Trust · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · R a Long Foundation 600 Plaza West Bldg · The H & R Block Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Servant Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Community Services of Johnson County Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.