Skip to content
Uniquesource Products & Services at a glance

· Public charity

Uniquesource Products & Services

Our mission is to partner with member agencies to identify, market, and deliver products and services that advance employment opportunities for professionals with disabilities.

$388k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Employment$670kHealth$337kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $143k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $240k
$49,682
Median grant
1
States reached
$80M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEAVER COUNTY REHAB CENTER$60,000
SERVICESOURCE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES$60,000
WESTMORELAND COUNTY BLIND ASSOCIATION$60,000
NORTH CENTRAL SIGHT SERVICES$60,000
VIA OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY$49,682
VISION RESOURCES OF CENTRAL PA$35,822
PARTNERS IN PROGRESS$28,000
NUVISIONS CENTER$17,248
GOODWILL KEYSTONE$12,272
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $381k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 29% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WESTMORELAND COUNTY BLIND ASSOCIATION: $60k → 10%BLIND AND VISION REHABILITATION SERVICES OF PITTSBURGH: $25k → 11%VIA OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $58k → 11%NORTH CENTRAL SIGHT SERVICES: $60k → 12%WESTMORELAND COUNTY BLIND ASSOCIATION: $46k → 10%VIA OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $50k → 11%NORTH CENTRAL SIGHT SERVICES: $32k → 12%VIA OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $31k → 11%HOPE ENTERPRISES INC: $19k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$632k · 7 repeat orgs$403k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$632k
$243k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+10%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $160k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
EmploymentHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VO
    Via of the Lehigh Valley Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $139k · revenue +12%
  • WC
    WESTMORELAND COUNTY BLIND ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $106k · revenue +0%
  • NC
    NUVISIONS CENTER
    3× · 2023–2025 · $69k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • KB
    KEYSTONE BLIND ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2024 · $60k · revenue 0%
  • TA
    THE ARC OF BUTLER COUNTY
    one grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue +10%
  • SS
    SpArc Services
    one grant, 2024 · $59k · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Job Options Inc

To actively seek employment for individuals with psychological or physical disabilities.

Employment
2
New Vision for Independence Inc

New vision for independence, inc. (new vision) is a nationally accredited 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization providing rehabilitation, community education, and support services for people with low vision or blindness, and their families to…

Human Services
3
Via Rehabilitation Services Inc

Our mission is to empower people with disabilities and their families to grow, develop, and thrive by providing essential skill-building, therapeutic, and recreational programs.

Health
4
Keystone Vocational Services Inc

To provide vocational/training to blind and disabled people through the manufacture and assembly of tools & helmets, and a mailroom contract.

Employment
5
Bestwork Industries for the Blind Inc

Bestwork industries for the blind, inc. is a non-profit organization that provides opportunities for training and productive employment for many people who are blind and visually impaired. bestwork industries works closely with the…

Employment
6
Abilities Inc

Abilites Inc is a non-profit agency dedicated to facilitating integrated employment and full participation of persons with disabilities in their work and living communities. Employment is accomplished through direct service to youth and…

—
7
Vocational Solutions of Henderson County Inc

Developmental and rehabilitation services for disabled individuals

—
8
Training Rehabilitation & Development Institute Inc

Organized for the purpose of training and employment of persons with disabilities for various jobs.

Employment
9
Berks County Association ft Blind Inc Dba Vision Resource Center of Berks Cnty

To Enrich the Lives of Visually Impaired Persons and their Caregivers while providing Preventative Services and Education.

Health
10
Vocational Services Inc

Providing job opportunities for individuals with barriers to employment

—
11
Vista Adult Services Organization

To provide job support and behavioral care for adults diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder.

Health
12
Puerto Rico Industries for the Blind

Train and employ people with severe disabilities that are in need of training, employment and services.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vision Resources of Central Pennsylvania; the most unlike its peers is Via of the Lehigh Valley Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
7/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Via of the Lehigh Valley Inc: $139,437 · Human ServicesVia of the Lehigh Valley IncWESTMORELAND COUNTY BLIND ASSOCIATION: $105,700 · Human ServicesWESTMORELAND COUNTY BLIND ASSOCIATIONNORTH CENTRAL SIGHT SERVICES INC: $91,847 · Human ServicesNORTH CENTRAL SIGHT SERVICES INCVISABILITY: $25,000 · Human ServicesVISABILITYHOPE ENTERPRISES INC: $19,200 · Human ServicesLARK ENTERPRISES INC: $120,000 · EmploymentLARK ENTERPRISES INCNUVISIONS CENTER: $69,464 · EmploymentNUVISIONS CENTERSERVICESOURCE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES INC: $60,000 · EmploymentSERVICESOURCE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES INCBEAVER COUNTY REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $60,000 · EmploymentBEAVER COUNTY REHABILITATION CENTER INCSpArc Services: $59,323 · EmploymentSpArc Services+1 more: $12,272 · EmploymentVISION RESOURCES OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA: $82,800 · HealthVISION RESOURCE…THE ARC OF BUTLER COUNTY: $59,959 · HealthTHE ARC OF BUTL…KEYSTONE BLIND ASSOCIATION: $60,000 · OtherKEYSTONE BLIND…PARTNERS IN PROGRESS: $28,000 · OtherPARTNERS IN PR…VENANGO TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $23,096 · OtherVENANGO TRAINI…PENN-YORK OPPORTUNITIES INC: $19,357 · OtherPENN-YORK OPPO…
Human Services$381,184Employment$381,059Health$142,759Other$130,453

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVia of the Lehigh Valley Inc: $139,437 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetLARK ENTERPRISES INC: $120,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetWESTMORELAND COUNTY BLIND ASSOCIATION: $105,700 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetNORTH CENTRAL SIGHT SERVICES INC: $91,847 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetVISION RESOURCES OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA: $82,800 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetNUVISIONS CENTER: $69,464 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetKEYSTONE BLIND ASSOCIATION: $60,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBEAVER COUNTY REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $60,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ARC OF BUTLER COUNTY: $59,959 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSpArc Services: $59,323 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetVISABILITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVENANGO TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $23,096 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPENN-YORK OPPORTUNITIES INC: $19,357 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHOPE ENTERPRISES INC: $19,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOODWILL KEYSTONE AREA: $12,272 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Industries f…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Industries for the BlindVA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Industries for the Blind · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Uniquesource Products & Services funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Uniquesource Products & Services. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Uniquesource Products & Services’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home