Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Uja Federation of Greenwich Inc

We enrich, support and connect jewish greenwich and jewish communities in israel and worldwide with exceptional cultural and educational programs, advocacy and jewish philanthropy.

$3.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$926k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

International$6.9MPhilanthropy$1.7MHuman Services$950kEducation$493kArts & Culture$313kReligion$231kYouth Development$150kHealth$150kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 13 grants below total $1,285,633 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,968,337 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,682,704 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $160k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
  • $250k+1 grant · $926k
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JDC$925,633
BBYO$100,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTH AMERICA$50,000
THE BI-CULTURAL HEBREW ACADEMY OF CONNECTICUT INCORPORATED$50,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$30,000
JEWISH FEDERATION ASSOCIATION OF CONNECTICUT INC$25,000
HILLEL - UCONN$25,000
SIXPOINT INC$20,000
ICC - ISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION$15,000
STAND WITH US$15,000
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE$10,000
EMUNAH OF AMERICA$10,000
MOZAIC SENIOR LIFE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MET COUNCIL ON POVERTY: $15k → 17%MET COUNCIL ON POVERTY: $15k → 17%MET COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $10k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
NC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.0M · 26 repeat orgs$440k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
15

Total granted

$9.0M
$420k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
0%

Still filing today

92%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalArts & CultureEducationHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $6.5M · revenue +24%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREENWICH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $849k · revenue ×14 · 30% of their budget
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    3× · 2017–2023 · $185k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • NY
    New York Historical Society
    one grant, 2020 · $125k · revenue +5%
  • TP
    THE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +18%
  • NU
    NLI USA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -41%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
The Jerusalem Connection
—
3
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
4
University of Judaism Foundation
—
5
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
—
7
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
8
American Friends of Even Yisroel Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
10
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
11
National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
—
12
Delegation of Jewish American Students (Dojas)
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emunah of America Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friendship Circle of Connecticut Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community Organizati…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Policy Research and AdvocacyAffordable Housing Developm…Cancer Support ServicesCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%3%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr19%28%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%2%10–20yr19%5%20–35yr13%11%35–55yr16%81%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/47
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,713

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/43
Grantees still filing
24/43
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $6,509,006 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc+13 more — $424,200 · International+13 moreTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $1,506,978 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERA…UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $184,842 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APP…+2 more — $32,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREENWICH — $849,310 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SE…Carmel Academy — $261,400 · OtherCarmel AcademyBNai Brith Hillel Foundation at the University of Connecticut — $137,585 · OtherBNai Brith Hille…THE BI-CULTURAL HEBREW ACADEMY OF CONNECTICUT INCORPORATED — $101,250 · OtherTHE BI-CULTURAL …NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC — $60,000 · Other+10 more — $200,823 · Other+10 moreNew York Historical Society — $125,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureSouthern New England Consortium of Partnership 2000 Incorporated — $42,580 · Arts & CultureJEWISH EDUCATION IN MEDIA INC DBA JBS JEWISH BROADCASTING SERVICE — $35,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $10,000 · Arts & CultureBREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC — $135,000 · HealthJEWISH HOME FOR THE ELDERLY OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC — $45,000 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER INC — $8,500 · HealthB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION — $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentNLI USA INC — $50,000 · EducationISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION INC — $40,000 · EducationJFACT FUND INC — $21,700 · EducationSIXPOINT INC — $20,000 · EducationFriendship Circle of Connecticut Inc — $17,000 · Education
International$6,933,206Philanthropy$1,724,320Other$1,610,368Arts & Culture$312,580Health$188,500Youth Development$150,000Education$148,700

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $6,509,006 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $1,506,978 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREENWICH — $849,310 over 8y, 30% of budgetCarmel Academy — $261,400 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $184,842 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION — $150,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBNai Brith Hillel Foundation at the University of Connecticut — $137,585 over 8y, 8.8% of budgetBREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC — $135,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetNew York Historical Society — $125,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $95,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE THROUGH EDUCATION — $75,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC — $60,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMETROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY — $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNLI USA INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH HOME FOR THE ELDERLY OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC — $45,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEMUNAH OF AMERICA INC — $44,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSouthern New England Consortium of Partnership 2000 Incorporated — $42,580 over 2y, 27% of budgetISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION INC — $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH EDUCATION IN MEDIA INC DBA JBS JEWISH BROADCASTING SERVICE — $35,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL — $32,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINVESTIGATIVE PROJECT ON TERRORISM FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE JEWISH HIGH SCHOOL OF CONNECTICUT — $27,860 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetSolomon Schechter School of Manhattan — $27,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMIDDLE EAST MEDIA AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION ASSOCIATION OF CONNECTICUT INC — $25,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF STAMFORD INC — $23,506 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $22,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetATZUM INC — $22,100 over 2y, 10% of budgetJFACT FUND INC — $21,700 over 2y, 14% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIXPOINT INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFriendship Circle of Connecticut Inc — $17,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetYAD EZRA V'SHULAMIT — $11,100 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHALVA ISRAEL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER INC — $8,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC — $6,957 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF ELNET — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundFjcUnited Jewish Federat…Federation for Jewish…Nash Family FoundationCombined Jewish Phila…Jewish Community Fede…The Ellen and Gary Da…Jewish Federation of …Jewish Community Foun…National Philanthropi…Synchrony Foundation
Jewish Communal FundNY28× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Fjc · United Jewish Federation Stamford New Canaan Darien Inc · Federation for Jewish Philanthropy of Upper Fairfield County · Nash Family Foundation · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Ellen and Gary Davis Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · National Philanthropic Trust · Synchrony Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Uja Federation of Greenwich Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Jewish Federation Association of Connecticut Inc — 69% of income from government
  • Jewish Family Services of Greenwich — 41% of income from government
  • Jewish Family Service of Stamford Inc — 2% of income from government
  • The Jewish Federation of Greater New Haven Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Jewish Home for the Elderly of Fairfield County Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home