Loading…
· Private foundation
UHY CARES NY INC
Charitable purpose of aiding new york residents who are suffering personal emergencies or hardships by providing financial assistance to such individuals and to other charitable organizations which provide such assistance.
$99k
Granted FY2024
12
Grants
3
Communities
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 87% of UHY CARES NY INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2022
llp memoryadvisorsmemory johnjohn nealthomas
2023
—
2024
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 12 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $9k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$250
Median grant
3
States reached
$29k
Total assets
Largest grants
- CENTER FOR DISABILITY SERVICES$50,000
- WERC$40,000
- THE FOUNDATION FOR ELLIS MEDICINE$5,000
- THE UNIVERSITY AT ALBANY FOUNDATION$1,500
- JOSEPH'S HOUSE AND SHELTER$500
- BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EASTERN MA$250
- THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE$250
- ST CHRISTOPHER'S INN AT GRAYMOOR$250
- MITCHELL HOLLOW MISSION CHURCH$250
- BSTRA INC$250
- HOLY CROSS AMERICAN APOSTOLIC CHURCH$150
- ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESARCH HOSPITAL$125
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
05
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 73% of UHY CARES NY INC’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 95% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 24% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
UHY CARES NY INClessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient addressRecipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Health
2
St Peter's Health Partners Medical
To provide health care services
Health
3
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Health
4
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation
Central maine healthcare corporation supports its affiliated healthcare institutions in order for these entities to provide exceptional healthcare services.
Health
5
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Health
6
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Health
7
St Peter's Health Partners
To provide health care system management and support
Health
8
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Health
9
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Health
10
St Joseph's Physician Health Pc
To provide health care services
Health
11
Physician Affiliate Group of New York Pc
To offer responsive and quality healthcare to the new york community while fulfilling the educational and entrepreneurial needs of our members.
Health
12
St Joseph's Medical Pc
To provide health care services
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Backstoppers Inc Fka and the most unlike its peers is University At Albany Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
06the grantee network
13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$218,685Education$27,000Arts & Culture$2,000Public Benefit$1,000Youth Development$500Housing & Shelter$500Human Services$250International$250
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WHOLE CHILD ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY AT ALBANY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PREVENT CHILD ABUSE AMERICA ↗
- Who funds CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY OF LINCOLN CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE BACKSTOPPERS INC ↗
- Who funds PTSD FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds SARATOGA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds ST PETER'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW BALTIMORE GOODFELLOWS ↗
- Who funds JOSEPH'S HOUSE AND SHELTER ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL REGION CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NOTRE DAME HEALTH CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL MISSIONS FOR CHILDREN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Mitzen Foundation IncNY13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Mitzen Foundation Inc · Review Foundation · The Community Foundation for the Greater · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Ge Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation UHY CARES NY INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Notre Dame Health Care Center Inc — 16% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WHOLE CHILD ACADEMY.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~4 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 6.8× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 822350489 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on WHOLE CHILD ACADEMY, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Uhy Cares Ny Inc?
Find your warmest path to Uhy Cares Ny Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines