· Private foundation
Ud Hpb Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k27 grants · $579k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $505k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GIVE TO GIVE FOUNDATION | $80,000 |
| ASSOCIATES OF THE BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY | $75,000 |
| FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC | $50,000 |
| SERENE HARBOR INC | $50,000 |
| BETH ISRAEL LAHEY HEALTH | $50,000 |
| TEAM RUBICON | $50,000 |
| THE PREPARATORY FOUNDATION INC | $50,000 |
| STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS | $50,000 |
| WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT | $50,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $42,000 |
| SAMARITANS INC | $30,000 |
| IGNITE MENTAL HEALTH | $30,000 |
| MAD IN AMERICA FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $30,000 |
| MYRIAD USA INC | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $741k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
52 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WSWATKINSON SCHOOL9× · 2017–2025 · $532k · revenue +28%
- FHFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC8× · 2018–2025 · $400k · revenue +30%
- TRTEAM RUBICON INC8× · 2018–2025 · $375k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- NYNEW YORK EYE ANDone grant, 2017 · $80k
- MHMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INCone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +1%
- WWGBHone grant, 2019 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
Bridgespan's mission is to build a better world by strengthening the ability of mission-driven organizations and philanthropists to achieve breakthrough results in addressing society's most important challenges and opportunities.
Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…
Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.
Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.
Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is I Am Acceptance Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WATKINSON SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITANS INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Serene Harbor Inc ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds BROC COMMUNITY ACTION IN SOUTHWESTERN VERMONT ↗
- Who funds THE RED SOX FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GAINING GROUND INC ↗
- Who funds MAD IN AMERICA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Bennington County Meals Program ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds Warrior Dog Foundation ↗
- Who funds WRITERS WITHOUT MARGINS INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATES OF BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANITY IN UNITY INC ↗
- Who funds Children of Fallen Patriots Foundation ↗
- Who funds No One Left Behind ↗
- Who funds AMERICA'S MIGHTY WARRIORS ↗
- Who funds BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL AUTISM PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE ARMAND HAMMER UNITED WORLD COLLEGE OF THE AMER ↗
- Who funds THE GIVE TO GIVE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BETH ISRAEL LAHEY HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds CONCORD ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds PREPARATORY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Rhode Island Community Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Gpb Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Chase Family Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Fidelity Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ud Hpb Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Communities for People Inc — 43% of income from government
- Serene Harbor Inc — 31% of income from government
- Samaritans Inc — 31% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Gaining Ground Inc — 5% of income from government
- Watkinson School — 2% of income from government
- The Red Sox Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Friends of Mount Auburn Cemetery — 1% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.