Skip to content
Tzp Cares Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Tzp Cares Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$128k
Granted FY2025still arriving
50
Grants FY2025still arriving
18
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$256kHuman Services$211kFood & Nutrition$150kEducation$118kYouth Development$86kHousing & Shelter$60kRecreation & Sports$47kAnimals$43kOther$0
02FY2025 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
18
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$4,000
EATING DISORDERS RESOURCE CENTER$4,000
HEROES FOR CHILDREN$4,000
SOS$4,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT$4,000
CENTER FOR INTERNET SECURITY$4,000
PTSD FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$4,000
PROJECT 48$4,000
THE MISTY COPELAND FOUNDATION$4,000
GRACEWORKS$4,000
COMMUNITY INTERVENTION CENTER OF LACKAWANNA COUNTY$4,000
CHILDREN OF CONSERVATION$4,000
PYRAMID CARES ASSOCIATE RELIEF FUND$4,000
FOR THE VILLAGE INC$4,000
MONMOUTH COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $193k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HELPING PAWS INC: $2k → 11%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $2k → 5%SELFLESS LOVE FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%PROJECT 48: $4k → 12%YOUTH VILLAGES FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 17%ST MARY'S CHILD CENTER: $3k → 16%THE PIGGYBACK FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%AUTISM FAMILY SERVICES OF NJ: $2k → 11%SHARING & CARING HANDS: $3k → 11%ISLAND HARVEST: $3k → 6%ISLAND HARVEST: $3k → 7%CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK: $3k → 5%BLUE SKY THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND RESPITE: $3k → 8%URBAN LEAGUE: $3k → 12%THE PIGGYBACK FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%A KID AGAIN: $3k → 15%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $3k → 11%MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK: $3k → 5%BLUE SKY THERAPEUTIC RIDING & RESPITE: $3k → 8%TESTICULAR CANCER FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $3k → 13%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $2k → 13%CONGREGATION FOR KIDS: $3k → 10%LOAVES AND FISHES: $3k → 7%CHILDHELP INC: $4k → 11%SHARING CARING HANDS: $2k → 11%SUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $3k → 6%CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK: $3k → 5%TESTICULAR CANCER FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%THE FAMILY PLACE INC: $3k → 14%CONGREGATION FOR KIDS: $3k → 10%LOAVES AND FISHES: $3k → 7%CHILDHELP: $3k → 11%SUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $3k → 6%CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK OF NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS: $2k → 5%CONGREGATION FOR KIDS: $2k → 10%LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3k → 7%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY: $2k → 7%FOR THE VILLAGE INC: $4k → 11%ASSOCIATION FOR TECHNOLOGY DEPENDENT CHILDREN: $3k → 7%CLARIS HEALTH: $3k → 14%CLARIS HEALTH: $3k → 14%GOOD PLUS FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%YOUTHLINK: $3k → 11%HOMEFRONT INC: $3k → 9%ALEX MORGAN FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WA
ID
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Tzp Cares Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Tzp Cares Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.0% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$651k · 118 repeat orgs$582k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

118 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 97 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

118
278

Total granted

$651k
$504k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+19%

Still filing today

70%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $78k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GK
    GIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $17k · revenue +32%
  • ED
    EATING DISORDERS RESOURCE CENTER
    5× · 2021–2025 · $16k · revenue +58%
  • LF
    LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES
    5× · 2021–2025 · $13k · revenue +124%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BOULDER
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • EC
    EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +70%
  • T1
    THE 1ST LIEUTENANT DEREK HINES SOLDIERS ASSISTANCE
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
2
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
3
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
4
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
5
Hunger Solutions New York Inc

We strive to maximize participation in, and support for, federally funded nutrition assistance programs including supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap), the school breakfast program and national school lunch program, the summer…

Food & Nutrition
6
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
7
Philabundance

PHILABUNDANCE WAS FOUNDED IN 1984 WITH THE SIMPLE BELIEF THAT NO ONE SHOULD GO HUNGRY WHILE HEALTHY FOOD GOES TO WASTE. OUR MISSION IS TO DRIVE HUNGER FROM OUR COMMUNITIES TODAY AND TO END HUNGER FOR GOOD. We have a commitment to always…

Food & Nutrition
8
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
9
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
10
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
11
Opportunity Partners

Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…

Employment
12
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Resource Center; the most unlike its peers is San Diego Breastfeeding Center Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

278 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 278 of the 428 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
58
Early backer (in before they grew)
272/278
Grantees still filing
183/278
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+117 more: $500,004 · Other+117 moreLOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $13,000 · Human ServicesLOAVES & FISHES COMM…Congregations for Kids Inc: $11,834 · Human ServicesCongregations for Ki…CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC: $8,500 · Human ServicesCLARIS HEALTH: $8,000 · Human ServicesSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesMAITRI: $8,000 · Human ServicesBLUE SKY THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND RESPITE: $7,500 · Human ServicesTHE PIGGYBACK FOUNDATION: $7,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $6,700 · Human ServicesCHILDHELP INC: $6,500 · Human ServicesASSOCIATION FOR TECHNOLOGY DEPENDENT CHILDREN INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesTesticular Cancer Foundation: $6,000 · Human Services+19 more: $72,600 · Human Services+19 moreEATING DISORDERS RESOURCE CENTER: $16,000 · HealthEATING DI…ANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC: $12,000 · HealthANGEL FLI…Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $8,240 · HealthDana-Farb…NAMI National: $6,500 · HealthNAMI Nati…DIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE: $5,500 · HealthDIDI HIRS…Dakota Medical Foundation: $4,500 · HealthDakota Me…COMMUNITY INTERVENTION CENTER OF LACKAWANNA COUNTY: $4,000 · HealthALS UNITED OHIO INC: $3,000 · HealthAFLAC CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · HealthTREEHOUSE INC: $3,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,000 · HealthTHE MAMA-PIKIN FOUNDATION: $3,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $3,000 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $3,000 · HealthGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $14,000 · Food & NutritionJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $11,000 · Food & NutritionMOVE FOR HUNGER INC: $6,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL NEW YORK: $5,500 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC: $4,500 · Food & NutritionSecond Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc: $4,350 · Food & NutritionATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $4,350 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $3,500 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC: $3,000 · Food & NutritionCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $3,000 · Food & NutritionTHREE SQUARE: $3,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS OF STATEN ISLAND INC: $3,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $3,000 · Food & NutritionProverbs 226: $7,333 · EducationWomen In Cyber Security: $6,000 · EducationSAN DIEGO BREASTFEEDING CENTER FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationAffirm Leadership Christian Academy INC: $4,500 · EducationFOLDS OF HONOR - NORTH TEXAS INC: $4,000 · EducationBENJAMIN FRANKLIN CUMMINGS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $4,000 · EducationNaperville Education Foundation: $4,000 · EducationTHE GO PROJECT INC: $4,000 · EducationCLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EducationTHE CITY CLUB OF CLEVELAND: $3,000 · EducationOak Hill Academy: $3,000 · EducationTECHFLUENT: $3,000 · EducationBOBBY BRAGAN YOUTH FOUNDATION INC: $2,750 · EducationPENCIL INC: $8,500 · PhilanthropyBEHIND THE BLUE: $7,000 · PhilanthropySoaring Spirits International: $6,000 · PhilanthropyTHE AMERICAN AMUSEMENT MACHINE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · PhilanthropyNEVADA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · PhilanthropyUTAH'S PROMISE: $3,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $3,000 · PhilanthropyBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $8,000 · Youth DevelopmentALIVE CENTER NFP: $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentELE'S PLACE INC: $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentDRESS FOR SUCCESS LUZERNE COUNTY: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VENICE: $3,000 · Youth Development
Other$500,004Human Services$169,634Health$77,740Food & Nutrition$68,200Education$53,583Philanthropy$34,500Youth Development$21,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC: $16,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEATING DISORDERS RESOURCE CENTER: $16,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINJURED POLICE OFFICERS FUND: $13,500 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCongregations for Kids Inc: $11,834 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPENCIL INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $8,240 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCLARIS HEALTH: $8,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAITRI: $8,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetALLENDALE ASSOCIATION: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE SKY THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND RESPITE: $7,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEVADA MILITARY SUPPORT ALLIANCE: $7,500 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetProverbs 226: $7,333 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetTHE PIGGYBACK FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetCENTER FOR INTERNET SECURITY INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEHIND THE BLUE: $7,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $6,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDHELP INC: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWomen In Cyber Security: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSoaring Spirits International: $6,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMOVE FOR HUNGER INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR TECHNOLOGY DEPENDENT CHILDREN INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFREE THE GIRLS: $6,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTesticular Cancer Foundation: $6,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCROSSROADS FOR KIDS INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISLAND HARVEST LTD: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL NEW YORK: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S CHILD CENTER INC: $5,300 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetIREM Sacramento Valley Foundation: $5,250 over 5y, 11% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITY RESCUE MISSION OF LANSING MICH: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAN DIEGO BREASTFEEDING CENTER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDowntown United Soccer Club Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNOURISHMENT FOR THE NEEDY INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNEVADA POLICE FOUNDATION: $4,833 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC ↗
  • Who funds EATING DISORDERS RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds INJURED POLICE OFFICERS FUND ↗
  • Who funds LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC ↗
  • Who funds Congregations for Kids Inc ↗
  • Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds PENCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLARIS HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds MAITRI ↗
  • Who funds ALLENDALE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds BLUE SKY THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND RESPITE ↗
  • Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEVADA MILITARY SUPPORT ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Proverbs 226 ↗
  • Who funds THE PIGGYBACK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR INTERNET SECURITY INC ↗
  • Who funds BEHIND THE BLUE ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHELP INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMI National ↗
  • Who funds Women In Cyber Security ↗
  • Who funds Soaring Spirits International ↗
  • Who funds MOVE FOR HUNGER INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR TECHNOLOGY DEPENDENT CHILDREN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Synchrony FoundationSalesforce FoundationNew Canaan Community …Peoples United Commun…Fairfield County's Co…The Inner-City Founda…The Near and Far Asso…Motorola Solutions Fo…Baxter International …Eversource Energy Fou…Alexander Family Foun…Colorado Gives Founda…
Synchrony FoundationCT18.2× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Synchrony Foundation · Salesforce Foundation · New Canaan Community Foundation Inc · Peoples United Community Foundation · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · The Inner-City Foundation for Charity & Education Inc · The Near and Far Association Inc · Motorola Solutions Foundation · Baxter International Foundation · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Alexander Family Foundation Inc · Colorado Gives Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tzp Cares Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tzp Cares Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 170%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • The Workplace Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Alice Paul Institute Inc: 43% of income from government
  • Urban League of Portland Inc: 33% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Project 48 Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Women's Rights Information Center: 16% of income from government
  • The Open Door Shelter Inc: 14% of income from government
  • New England Aquarium Corporation: 12% of income from government
  • Center for Child Counseling Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Open Table Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Domus Kids Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Benjamin Franklin Cummings Institute of Technology: 5% of income from government
  • Zumix Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Crossroads for Kids Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Jewish Family & Children's Services of Northern New Jersey Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Ministries Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
17get no government money at all
53report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tzp Cares Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Tzp Cares Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 428 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tzp Cares’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home