Skip to content

· Public charity

Tzidkus Avrohom Beinish Inc

To benefit needy individuals and their families; to promote, foster, increase and advance the health, welfare and economic status of low income families.

$742k
Granted FY2022
11
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

Religion$308k
02FY2022 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $160,547, the rows itemized in this filing. The $742,194 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $581,647 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k5 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $126k
$10,820
Median grant
2
States reached
$138k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION VAYOKOM PINCHOS$43,100
NACHLAS YAAKOV$21,021
YESHIVA GEDOLAH OF CARTERET INC$20,504
CONGREGATION KEHILAS YAAKOV$18,734
SIACH YITZCHOK$12,025
CONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC$10,820
MESIVTA SHAREI CHAIM CORP$9,192
YESHIVA IMREI BINA INC$8,850
NYEX- NY YESHIVA EXPERIENCE$6,000
CONGREGATION ZLOCHEV$5,200
CONGREGATION CHONEN VNOSEN$5,101
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NYEX- NY YESHIVA EXPERIENCE: $6k → 6%SIACH YITZCHOK: $20k → 13%CONGREGATION KEHILATH JACOB OF MONSEY: $18k → 14%TOLDOS AHRON: $9k → 20%NACHLAS YAAKOV: $21k → 11%YESHIVAS MATISYAHU: $8k → 11%CONGREGATION KEHILAS YAAKOV: $19k → 13%CONG MASBIA LECHOL CHAI INC: $10k → 14%IYUN HAPARSHA: $17k → 20%YESHIVA GEDOLAH OF CARTERET INC: $21k → 11%SIACH YITZCHOK: $12k → 13%CONGREGATION ROMEMUS HATORAH: $7k → 14%YESHIVA IMREI BINA INC: $9k → 20%CONGREGATION JACKSON PINES: $5k → 11%MESIVTA SHAREI CHAIM CORP: $9k → 13%IYUN HAPARSHA: $8k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVEH ZION: $8k → 13%CONGREGATION VAYOKOM PINCHOS: $43k → 20%IYUN HAPARSHA INC: $7k → 20%CONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC: $11k → 20%CONGREGATION CHONEN VNOSEN: $5k → 20%CONGREGATION ZLOCHEV: $5k → 20%SHAAR HATALMUD INC: $6k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/5
Grantees still filing
3/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION VAYOKOM PINCHOS: $43,100 · OtherCONGREGATION VAYOKOM PINCHOSSIACH YITZCHOK: $32,025 · OtherSIACH YITZCHOKYESHIVA GEDOLAH OF CARTERET INC: $20,504 · OtherYESHIVA GEDOLAH OF CARTERET INCCONGREGATION KEHILAS YAAKOV: $18,734 · OtherCONGREGATION KEHILAS YAAKOVCONGREGATION KEHILATH JACOB OF MONSEY: $17,610 · OtherCONGREGATION KEHILATH JACOB OF MONSEYKINYAN TORAH: $16,500 · OtherKINYAN TORAHCONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC: $10,820 · OtherMESIVTA SHAAREI CHAIM: $9,192 · OtherCONGREGATION TOLDOS AHARON: $9,000 · Other+9 more: $52,442 · Other+9 moreIYUN HAPARSHA INC: $30,850 · ReligionIYUN HAPARSHA INCNACHLAS YAKOV: $21,021 · ReligionNACHLAS YAKOVCong Masbia Lechol Chai Inc: $10,060 · ReligionCong Masbia Lechol Chai IncYESHIVA IMREI BINA INC: $8,850 · ReligionYESHIVA IMREI BINA INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVEH ZION: $7,500 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVEH ZI…
Other$229,927Religion$78,281

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIYUN HAPARSHA INC: $30,850 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCong Masbia Lechol Chai Inc: $10,060 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetYESHIVA IMREI BINA INC: $8,850 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVEH ZION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IYUN HAPARSHA INC ↗
  • Who funds NACHLAS YAKOV ↗
  • Who funds Cong Masbia Lechol Chai Inc ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA IMREI BINA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVEH ZION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY29.1× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Engelberg Family Foundation · The Sorala Foundation · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tzidkus Avrohom Beinish Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tzidkus Avrohom Beinish Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tzidkus Avrohom Beinish Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Tzidkus Avrohom Beinish Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tzidkus Avrohom Beinish’s filings →

    More from the funding graph