Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Tzidkus Avrohom Beinish Inc

To benefit needy individuals and their families; to promote, foster, increase and advance the health, welfare and economic status of low income families.

$742k
Granted FY2022
11
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192022.

Religion$308k
02FY2022 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 11 grants below total $160,547 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $742,194 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $581,647 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k5 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $126k
$10,820
Median grant
2
States reached
$138k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION VAYOKOM PINCHOS$43,100
NACHLAS YAAKOV$21,021
YESHIVA GEDOLAH OF CARTERET INC$20,504
CONGREGATION KEHILAS YAAKOV$18,734
SIACH YITZCHOK$12,025
CONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC$10,820
MESIVTA SHAREI CHAIM CORP$9,192
YESHIVA IMREI BINA INC$8,850
NYEX- NY YESHIVA EXPERIENCE$6,000
CONGREGATION ZLOCHEV$5,200
CONGREGATION CHONEN VNOSEN$5,101
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NYEX- NY YESHIVA EXPERIENCE: $6k → 6%SIACH YITZCHOK: $20k → 13%CONGREGATION KEHILATH JACOB OF MONSEY: $18k → 14%TOLDOS AHRON: $9k → 20%NACHLAS YAAKOV: $21k → 11%YESHIVAS MATISYAHU: $8k → 11%CONGREGATION KEHILAS YAAKOV: $19k → 13%CONG MASBIA LECHOL CHAI INC: $10k → 14%IYUN HAPARSHA: $17k → 20%YESHIVA GEDOLAH OF CARTERET INC: $21k → 11%SIACH YITZCHOK: $12k → 13%CONGREGATION ROMEMUS HATORAH: $7k → 14%YESHIVA IMREI BINA INC: $9k → 20%CONGREGATION JACKSON PINES: $5k → 11%MESIVTA SHAREI CHAIM CORP: $9k → 13%IYUN HAPARSHA: $8k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVEH ZION: $8k → 13%CONGREGATION VAYOKOM PINCHOS: $43k → 20%IYUN HAPARSHA INC: $7k → 20%CONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC: $11k → 20%CONGREGATION CHONEN VNOSEN: $5k → 20%CONGREGATION ZLOCHEV: $5k → 20%SHAAR HATALMUD INC: $6k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/5
Grantees still filing
3/5
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CONGREGATION VAYOKOM PINCHOS — $43,100 · OtherCONGREGATION VAYOKOM PINCHOSSIACH YITZCHOK — $32,025 · OtherSIACH YITZCHOKYESHIVA GEDOLAH OF CARTERET INC — $20,504 · OtherYESHIVA GEDOLAH OF CARTERET INCCONGREGATION KEHILAS YAAKOV — $18,734 · OtherCONGREGATION KEHILAS YAAKOVCONGREGATION KEHILATH JACOB OF MONSEY — $17,610 · OtherCONGREGATION KEHILATH JACOB OF MONSEYKINYAN TORAH — $16,500 · OtherKINYAN TORAHCONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC — $10,820 · OtherMESIVTA SHAAREI CHAIM — $9,192 · OtherCONGREGATION TOLDOS AHARON — $9,000 · Other+9 more — $52,442 · Other+9 moreIYUN HAPARSHA INC — $30,850 · ReligionIYUN HAPARSHA INCNACHLAS YAKOV — $21,021 · ReligionNACHLAS YAKOVCong Masbia Lechol Chai Inc — $10,060 · ReligionCong Masbia Lechol Chai IncYESHIVA IMREI BINA INC — $8,850 · ReligionYESHIVA IMREI BINA INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVEH ZION — $7,500 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVEH ZI…
Other$229,927Religion$78,281

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetIYUN HAPARSHA INC — $30,850 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCong Masbia Lechol Chai Inc — $10,060 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetYESHIVA IMREI BINA INC — $8,850 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVEH ZION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IYUN HAPARSHA INC
  • Who funds NACHLAS YAKOV
  • Who funds Cong Masbia Lechol Chai Inc
  • Who funds YESHIVA IMREI BINA INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVEH ZION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY29.1× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Engelberg Family Foundation · The Sorala Foundation · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tzidkus Avrohom Beinish Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tzidkus Avrohom Beinish Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Tzidkus Avrohom Beinish Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph