Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Minnesota · Public charity

Twin Cities Diversity in Practice

To attract, recruit, advance, and retain attorneys of color in the twin cities through education and collaboration with member organizations.

$249k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2024
1
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$249,283
Largest grant, FY2024
$249,283
Organizations funded a year
1 to 1
FY2021 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$897k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations Twin Cities Diversity in Practice funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving1$249k0%
FY20231$153k0%
FY20211$10kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Civil Rights$412k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Wanton Injustice Legal Detail$412,373377%

Compare Twin Cities Diversity in Practice with peer funders

About Twin Cities Diversity in Practice

How much does Twin Cities Diversity in Practice give?
Twin Cities Diversity in Practice reported 1 grants totaling $249,283 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 1 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2023.
What does Twin Cities Diversity in Practice fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2024, its largest causes are Civil Rights (100%).
Who are Twin Cities Diversity in Practice's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2024: Wanton Injustice Legal Detail ($412k).
Does Twin Cities Diversity in Practice fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Twin Cities Diversity in Practice based?
Twin Cities Diversity in Practice is based in MN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Twin Cities Diversity in Practice’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home