Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tuw John P Huber Charitable Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$118k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$102kRecreation & Sports$80kCrime & Legal$66kYouth Development$48kFood & Nutrition$38kEducation$31kArts & Culture$28kHuman Services$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $75k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $43k
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPECIALIZED TRAINING FOR ADULT REHABILIT$16,000
Individual grant recipient$16,000
GUM DROPS NFP$11,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHERN IL$9,067
ARCHWAY INC$9,000
BOSKYDELL PONY CLUB$7,000
AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM OF SOUTHERN ILLI$7,000
POSHARD FOUNDATION FOR ABUSED CHILDREN I$7,000
CARBONDALE JUNIOR SPORTS INC$6,000
THE NIGHT'S SHIELD$6,000
CASA OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY INC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
I CAN READ PROGRAM OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS$5,000
CASA OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS$5,000
TUNE SQUAD ATHLETIC$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 61% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE: $100k → 14%CHILDRENS ADVOCACY & ENLIGHTENMENT: $5k → 13%TUNE SQUAD ATHLETIC: $6k → 15%CASA OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS: $5k → 16%THE NIGHT'S SHIELD: $6k → 20%CARBONDALE PARK DISTRICT: $10k → 23%SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE: $99k → 14%CHILDRENS ADVOCACY & ENLIGHTENMENT: $5k → 13%THE NIGHT'S SHIELD: $5k → 20%ARCHWAY INC: $9k → 23%CASA OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY INC: $5k → 13%ARCHWAY INC: $9k → 23%ARCHWAY INC: $9k → 23%ARCHWAY INC: $8k → 23%DESOTO GRADE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $6k → 23%SPECIALIZED TRAINING FOR ADULT REHABILIT: $16k → 13%CARBONDALE PARK DISTRICT: $6k → 23%SPECIALIZED TRAINING FOR ADULT REHABILIT: $16k → 13%DESOTO GRADE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $5k → 23%SPECIALIZED TRAINING FOR ADULT REHABILIT: $16k → 13%BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF CARBONDALE: $13k → 13%CARBONDALE PARK DISTRICT: $19k → 23%SPECIALIZED TRAINING FOR ADULT REHABILIT: $12k → 13%CARBONDALE PARK DISTRICT: $16k → 23%BOSKYDELL PONY CLUB: $8k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHERN IL: $9k → 23%AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM OF SOUTHERN ILLI: $7k → 13%CARBONDALE PARK DISTRICT: $9k → 23%BOSKYDELL PONY CLUB: $7k → 13%CARBONDALE PARK DISTRICT-HICKORY: $8k → 23%BOSKYDELL PONY CLUB: $7k → 13%I CAN READ PROGRAM OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS: $5k → 23%BOSKYDELL PONY CLUB: $7k → 13%I CAN READ PROGRAM OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS: $5k → 23%AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM OF SOUTHERN ILLI: $6k → 13%AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM OF SOUTHERN ILLI: $6k → 13%CARBONDALE JUNIOR SPORTS INC: $6k → 13%CARBONDALE JUNIOR SPORTS INC: $5k → 13%AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM OF SOUTHERN ILLI: $5k → 13%CARBONDALE JUNIOR SPORTS INC: $5k → 13%GUM DROPS NFP: $11k → 13%GUM DROPS NFP: $10k → 13%GUM DROPS NFP: $9k → 13%GUM DROPS NFP: $8k → 13%POSHARD FOUNDATION FOR ABUSED CHILDREN I: $7k → 13%POSHARD FOUNDATION FOR ABUSED CHILDREN I: $7k → 13%POSHARD FOUNDATION FOR ABUSED CHILDREN I: $7k → 13%POSHARD FOUNDATION FOR ABUSED CHILDREN I: $7k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$409k · 16 repeat orgs$108k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against -73% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
17

Total granted

$409k
$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
-73%

Still filing today

50%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsFood & NutritionCrime & LegalCivil RightsHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GN
    GUMDROPS NFP
    4× · 2021–2025 · $38k · revenue +74%
  • PF
    POSHARD FOUNDATION FOR ABUSED CHILDREN INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $28k · revenue +24%
  • CJ
    CARBONDALE JUNIOR SPORTS INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $21k · revenue +137%

Funded once

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN ILLINOI
    one grant, 2021 · $13k · revenue -73%
  • ST
    S T A R T
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CARBONDALE
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa of the Illinois Valley

Provide legal services for children in area.

Human Services
2
Casa of South Central Illinois

The trained volunteers of CASA of South Central Illinois will work with legal and child welfare professionals, educators, and service providers to advocate for the best interests of children that have experienced abuse and/or neglect that…

—
3
Casa of Southwestern Illinois

To recruit, train, supervise and support volunteers who advocate for the best interest (reduction of physical, emotional, intellectual and social injuries) for abused and neglected children in the court system.

Civil Rights
4
Casa of West Central Illinois

To advocate for abused and neglected children in the legal welfare system.

Crime & Legal
5
Casa of Tipton County

Child Advocacy Services

Crime & Legal
6
Casa of Southeastern Illinois Inc

Provide court appointed advocates for children

Human Services
7
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Cook County

CASA of Cook County's vision is to protect abused and neglected children by providing them in court, a safe and permanent home, and an opportunity to grow, learn and thrive.

Crime & Legal
8
Child Advocacy Center of Mchenry Co Inc

Provide Counselors in Child Abuse Situations

Crime & Legal
9
Boone County Casa

Advocacy for abused and neglected children

Crime & Legal
10
Champaign County Casa Inc

Advocate for abused and neglected children. recruiting, training, and monitoring of volunteers who advocate for the best interest of abused and neglected children referred by the courts.

Civil Rights
11
Prevent Child Abuse Illinois

To prevent child abuse in Illinois through education, awareness, advocacy, and community support

Crime & Legal
12
Illinois Institute for Children

Providing Social Services to Families including Child Care

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Clubs of Southern Illinoi; the most unlike its peers is Boskydell Pony Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $63,423 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSPECIALIZED TRAINING FOR ADULT REHABILIT: $60,000 · OtherSPECIALIZED TRAINING FOR ADULT REHABILITARCHWAY INC: $35,000 · OtherARCHWAY INCAFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM OF SOUTHERN ILLI: $24,000 · OtherAFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM OF SOUTHERN ILLII CAN READ PROGRAM OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS: $17,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHERN IL: $13,197 · Other+19 more: $126,000 · Other+19 moreBOSKYDELL PONY CLUB: $29,000 · Recreation & SportsBOSKYDELL P…CARBONDALE JUNIOR SPORTS INC: $21,400 · Recreation & SportsCARBONDALE …GUMDROPS NFP: $38,000 · Food & NutritionPOSHARD FOUNDATION FOR ABUSED CHILDREN INC: $28,000 · Crime & LegalCASA OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS INC: $20,000 · Civil RightsTHE NIGHT'S SHIELD: $14,500 · Housing & ShelterChildren's Advocacy Renewal and Enlightenment Inc: $14,000 · HealthBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN ILLINOI: $13,000 · Youth Development
Other$338,620Recreation & Sports$50,400Food & Nutrition$38,000Crime & Legal$28,000Civil Rights$20,000Housing & Shelter$14,500Health$14,000Youth Development$13,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGUMDROPS NFP: $38,000 over 4y, 9.4% of budgetARCHWAY INC: $35,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetBOSKYDELL PONY CLUB: $29,000 over 4y, 36% of budgetPOSHARD FOUNDATION FOR ABUSED CHILDREN INC: $28,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetCARBONDALE JUNIOR SPORTS INC: $21,400 over 4y, 12% of budgetCASA OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS INC: $20,000 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetTHE NIGHT'S SHIELD: $14,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetChildren's Advocacy Renewal and Enlightenment Inc: $14,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN ILLINOI: $13,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GUMDROPS NFP ↗
  • Who funds ARCHWAY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSKYDELL PONY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds POSHARD FOUNDATION FOR ABUSED CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds CARBONDALE JUNIOR SPORTS INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NIGHT'S SHIELD ↗
  • Who funds Children's Advocacy Renewal and Enlightenment Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN ILLINOI ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tuw John P Huber Charitable Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tuw John P Huber Charitable Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tuw John P Huber Charitable Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph