· Private foundation
Tuw John P Huber Charitable Tr
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $75k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $43k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SPECIALIZED TRAINING FOR ADULT REHABILIT | $16,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $16,000 |
| GUM DROPS NFP | $11,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHERN IL | $9,067 |
| ARCHWAY INC | $9,000 |
| BOSKYDELL PONY CLUB | $7,000 |
| POSHARD FOUNDATION FOR ABUSED CHILDREN I | $7,000 |
| AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM OF SOUTHERN ILLI | $7,000 |
| CARBONDALE JUNIOR SPORTS INC | $6,000 |
| THE NIGHT'S SHIELD | $6,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| CASA OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY INC | $5,000 |
| CASA OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS | $5,000 |
| I CAN READ PROGRAM OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS | $5,000 |
| TUNE SQUAD ATHLETIC | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 61% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against -73% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GNGUMDROPS NFP4× · 2021–2025 · $38k · revenue +74%
- PFPOSHARD FOUNDATION FOR ABUSED CHILDREN INC4× · 2021–2025 · $28k · revenue +24%
- CJCARBONDALE JUNIOR SPORTS INC4× · 2021–2025 · $21k · revenue +137%
Funded once
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIone grant, 2021 · $13k · revenue -73%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CARBONDALEone grant, 2019 · $11k
- STS T A R Tone grant, 2019 · $11k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide legal services for children in area.
The trained volunteers of CASA of South Central Illinois will work with legal and child welfare professionals, educators, and service providers to advocate for the best interests of children that have experienced abuse and/or neglect that…
To recruit, train, supervise and support volunteers who advocate for the best interest (reduction of physical, emotional, intellectual and social injuries) for abused and neglected children in the court system.
To advocate for abused and neglected children in the legal welfare system.
Child Advocacy Services
Provide court appointed advocates for children
CASA of Cook County's vision is to protect abused and neglected children by providing them in court, a safe and permanent home, and an opportunity to grow, learn and thrive.
Provide Counselors in Child Abuse Situations
Advocacy for abused and neglected children
Advocate for abused and neglected children. recruiting, training, and monitoring of volunteers who advocate for the best interest of abused and neglected children referred by the courts.
To prevent child abuse in Illinois through education, awareness, advocacy, and community support
Providing Social Services to Families including Child Care
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Clubs of Southern Illinoi and the most unlike its peers is Boskydell Pony Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GUMDROPS NFP ↗
- Who funds ARCHWAY INC ↗
- Who funds BOSKYDELL PONY CLUB ↗
- Who funds POSHARD FOUNDATION FOR ABUSED CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds CARBONDALE JUNIOR SPORTS INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS INC ↗
- Who funds THE NIGHT'S SHIELD ↗
- Who funds Children's Advocacy Renewal and Enlightenment Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN ILLINOI ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tuw John P Huber Charitable Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.