Skip to content
Tuw Bradish Mem Scholarship at a glance

· Private foundation

Tuw Bradish Mem Scholarship

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$100k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$450kHealth$17k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $89k
$10,800
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WARREN WILSON COLLEGE$27,000
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY$27,000
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$13,000
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS$11,000
MACALESTER COLLEGE$10,800
MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY MANKATO$5,400
CONCORDIA COLLEGE$5,400
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$200
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $27k → 11%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $20k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $30k → 11%MACALESTER COLLEGE: $200 → 14%WINTER PARK HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%CORNELL COLLEGE: $200 → 9%WINNESHIEK MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $12k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $400 → 15%TRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $16k → 28%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON: $32k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $15k → 13%NORTHLAND COLLEGE: $20k → 14%ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 11%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $13k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES: $20k → 11%MACALESTER COLLEGE: $200 → 14%WINTER PARK HEALTH FOUNDATION: $350 → 11%WINNESHIEK MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $600 → 10%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $200 → 15%TRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $16k → 28%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON: $20k → 10%NORTHLAND COLLEGE: $20k → 14%ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES: $16k → 11%WINTER PARK HEALTH FOUNDATION: $100 → 11%WINNESHIEK MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $600 → 10%TRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 28%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON: $20k → 10%ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $16k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES: $16k → 11%WINNESHIEK MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $600 → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON: $16k → 10%WINNESHIEK MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $600 → 10%LUTHER COLLEGE: $200 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
MA
IA
NJ
MO
AZ
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$339k · 10 repeat orgs$94k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +84% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$339k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
+5%

Still filing today

40%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WM
    WINNESHIEK MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $15k · revenue +309%
  • MACALESTER COLLEGE
    3× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +69%
  • WP
    WINTER PARK HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $2k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • LC
    LUTHER COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $200 · revenue -2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
3
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
4
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
5
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
6
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
7
Pomona College

Throughout its history, pomona college has educated men and women of exceptional promise. we gather individuals, regardless of financial circumstances, into a small residential community that is strongly rooted in southern california yet…

Education
8
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
9
Wesleyan University

Wesleyan university is dedicated to providing an education in liberal arts by building a diverse, energetic community of students, faculty, and staff who value independence of mind and generosity of spirit. see additional description in…

Education
10
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
11
St Catherine University

We educate women to lead and influence. we educate at all degree levels through valuing and integrating the liberal arts and professional education within the catholic intellectual tradition, see schedule oemphasizing scholarly inquiry and…

Education
12
The Trustees of Mount Holyoke College

Located in south hadley, massachusetts, mount holyoke college is a highly selective, nondenominational, residential, research liberal arts college for women that is gender-diverse and welcomes applications from female, transgender, and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cornell College; the most unlike its peers is Winter Park Health Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON: $88,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISONARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $83,000 · OtherARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES: $52,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIESTRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $47,000 · OtherTRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $30,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $15,000 · Other+4 more: $11,800 · OtherNORTHLAND COLLEGE: $40,000 · EducationNORTHLAND COLLEGEMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $33,000 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of Te…WARREN WILSON COLLEGE: $27,000 · EducationWARREN WILSON COLLEGEMACALESTER COLLEGE: $11,200 · EducationMACALESTER COLLEGEWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $11,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY+3 more: $600 · EducationWINNESHIEK MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $14,538 · HealthWINTER PARK HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $2,478 · Health
Other$326,800Education$122,800Health$17,016

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHLAND COLLEGE: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $33,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWARREN WILSON COLLEGE: $27,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINNESHIEK MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $14,538 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetMACALESTER COLLEGE: $11,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION: $5,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINTER PARK HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $2,478 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHER COLLEGE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORNELL COLLEGE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHLAND COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds WARREN WILSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WINNESHIEK MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MACALESTER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds WINTER PARK HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds LUTHER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CORNELL COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ibm International Fou…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Ibm International FoundationNY13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ibm International Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tuw Bradish Mem Scholarship funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tuw Bradish Mem Scholarship. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 26%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 26% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tuw Bradish Mem Scholarship’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home