· Public charity
Turkish Philanthropy Funds Inc
The organization's mission is helping individual and corporate donors realize their philanthropic goals to meet community needs in the united states of america and in turkey
Read this first · the figures below need context
50% of Turkish Philanthropy Funds Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 16 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Turkish Philanthropy Funds Inc named its own grantees at scale: 20 organizations, $574k. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 25 grants below total $573,871 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $8,503,312 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $7,929,441 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $57k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $360k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $157k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICA GIVES INC | $57,075 |
| AMIT CHILDREN | $50,000 |
| AMERICAN UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $48,294 |
| ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $47,565 |
| ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY WP SCHOOL OF BUSINESS | $38,626 |
| BUSINESS COUNCIL FOR INTERNATIONAL UNDERSTANDING I | $35,000 |
| CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY | $32,340 |
| CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF MUSIC | $25,000 |
| COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY | $20,000 |
| DREXTEL UNIVERSITY | $20,000 |
| CORNELL UNIVERSITY | $20,000 |
| COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY | $20,000 |
| GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC | $18,004 |
| ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $3.9M on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: SOCIAL&ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT · DISASTER RELIEF · EQUALITY & EQUITY IN EDUCATION-
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $217k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
DUKE UNIVERSITY5× · 2017–2023 · $166k · revenue +51%- EFENDOMETRIOSIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC3× · 2017–2025 · $132k · revenue +79%
- GSGeorgia State University Foundation Inc7× · 2017–2024 · $120k · revenue +42%
Funded once
- MHMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INCone grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue +20%
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYone grant, 2022 · $62k · revenue +12%
University of Chicagoone grant, 2022 · $31k · revenue +22%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Education and Research
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.
Support of the educational and research activities of the american university of armenia (aua).
See Disclosure Above.
Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Queens College Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Turkish American Orchestra Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds BENT ON LEARNING INC ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ENDOMETRIOSIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds Georgia State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Community Foundation of Northern Nevada ↗
- Who funds Cornell University ↗
- Who funds TURKISH EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds Manhattan University ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds FILM INDEPENDENT ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Turkish American Orchestra Inc ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds AMERICA GIVES INC ↗
- Who funds AMIT CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds The George Washington University ↗
- Who funds Business Council for International Understanding Inc ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF ROBERT COLLEGE OF ISTANBUL ↗
- Who funds THE EVERGREEN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds California State University Fresno Alumni Association Incorporated ↗
- Who funds University of Chicago ↗
- Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NEUROSURGERY RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF MUSIC ↗
- Who funds BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EMPOWERING THE TURKISH AMERICAN COMMUNITY USA ↗
- Who funds ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC ↗
- Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
- Who funds PROJECT SUNSHINE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN TURKISH FRIENDSHIP AS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Verizon Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Turkish Philanthropy Funds Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Spectrum Works Inc — 40% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Turkish Philanthropy Funds Inc?
Find your warmest path to Turkish Philanthropy Funds Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.