· Public charity
Tufts Associated Health Maintenance Organization Inc
Detail regarding the organization's mission TUFTS ASSOCIATED HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION INC.'s ("tahmo") purpose is to guide and empower healthier lives for everyone.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $20,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $193,003 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $173,003 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ENHANCE ASIAN COMMUNITY ON HEALTH INC | $10,000 |
| CARIBE COMMUNICATIONS & PUBLICATIONS INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $92k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PFPOINT32HEALTH FOUNDATION INC3× · 2017–2019 · $21M · revenue +60% · 84% of their budget
- HCHEALTH CARE FOR ALL INC4× · 2017–2020 · $135k · revenue +313%
- ADALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC5× · 2017–2023 · $125k · revenue +40%
Funded once
- BIBaker-Polito Inaugural Committee Incone grant, 2018 · $25k
- TMTUFTS MEDICAL CENTER PARENT INCone grant, 2021 · $25k
- MHMassachusetts Health Quality Partners Incgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +35%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To advance the interests of the human services sector and providers through advocacy, education, and engagement of diverse stakeholders for collective impact.
The mission of the roundtable is to make massachusetts the most desirable place to live, work and do business by engaging private sector executives and public leaders to ensure access to a robust, diverse and talented workforce that…
Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.
Mpha promotes a healthy massachusetts through advocacy, education, community organizing and coalition building. we are leaders in the movement to create health equity by addressing the root causes of health and wellness. we promote…
Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…
To advance the health of individuals and communities by serving as the leading voice for all massachusetts hospitals and healthcare systems and to help them provide high quality, cost-effective and equitable patient care.
The massachusetts workforce association (mwa) is a statewide membership association that leads, advocates and convenes on behalf of the massachusetts workforce development system.
To promote high-quality, affordable, and equitable health care in massachusetts through advocacy, education and health policy research.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
The mission of rhode island health care association is to enhance its members' ability to provide sustainable quality health care and quality of life to the residents of rhode island's skilled nursing facilities.as a state affiliate of the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health Care for All Inc and the most unlike its peers is Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds POINT32HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTH CARE FOR ALL INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Watertown Police Employees Association Inc ↗
- Who funds RELIANT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY PANTRY OF CAPE COD CORP ↗
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds ENHANCE ASIAN COMMUNITY ON HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION ABLE OF GREATER BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS HEALTH COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds Visiting Nurse Association of Boston Inc ↗
- Who funds THE NEW ENGLAND COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds FENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOPE BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS ALLIANCE OF PORTUGUESE SPEAKERS INC ↗
- Who funds Massachusetts Health Quality Partners Inc ↗
- Who funds FIRSTWORKS ↗
- Who funds Associacao Caboverdiana De Brockton Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BENEFITS AND INSURANCE PROFESSIONALS - MA CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds LAWYERS FOR CIVIL RIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds THE GREATER PROVIDENCE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BRAILLE PRESS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds St Mary's Center for Women & Children Inc ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT COUNCILINC ↗
- Who funds BAY COVE HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds PERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS WOMEN'S POLITICAL CAUCUS LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONA ↗
- Who funds SALVE REGINA UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Foundation Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Point32health Foundation Inc · Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Amica Companies Foundation · Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Health Resources in Action Inc · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc)
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tufts Associated Health Maintenance Organization Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Operation Able of Greater Boston Inc — 81% of income from government
- Bay Cove Human Services Inc — 70% of income from government
- Advocates Inc — 66% of income from government
- Health Law Advocates Inc — 52% of income from government
- St Mary's Center for Women & Children Inc — 40% of income from government
- The Home for Little Wanderers Inc — 38% of income from government
- Joslin Diabetes Center Inc — 35% of income from government
- Fishing Partnership Health Plan Corporation — 31% of income from government
- Health Care for All Inc — 29% of income from government
- Fenway Community Health Center Inc — 27% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Enhance Asian Community On Health Inc — 19% of income from government
- Project Hope Boston Inc — 18% of income from government
- Perkins School for the Blind — 7% of income from government
- Massachusetts Alliance of Portuguese Speakers Inc — 4% of income from government
- Lawyers for Civil Rights Inc — 1% of income from government
- Massachusetts Health Council Inc — 0% of income from government
- Brazilian Women's Group Inc — 0% of income from government
- Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
- Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce — 0% of income from government
- The New England Council Inc — 0% of income from government
- National Braille Press Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.