Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tua Benson P Blake Char Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$84k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$134kArts & Culture$91kEducation$76kHuman Services$66kScience & Tech$34kRecreation & Sports$25kPublic Benefit$18kReligion$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$822k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STONINGTON FREE LIBRARY$10,000
WARM CENTER$10,000
CHRIST CHURCH$10,000
UNION CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH$5,000
MAINE COAST HERITAGE TRUST$5,000
TURNING POINT USA$5,000
DENISON PEQUOTSEPOS NATURE CENTER$5,000
YMCA - MYSTIC BRANCH$5,000
THE MAURICE C LA GRUA CENTER$5,000
BRASS FOUNDATION$5,000
MAINE ISLAND TRAIL ASSOCIATION$5,000
MAINE SEACOAST MISSION$3,000
EPOCH TIMES ASSOCIATION INC$3,000
JUDICIAL WATCH$2,000
STONINGTON CEMETERY ASSOCIATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RIVERFLOW COMMUNITY: $10k → 9%HONEYBEE HOLLOW CHILDRENS CENTER: $2k → 9%STONINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $5k → 9%STONINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $3k → 9%STONINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $3k → 9%STONINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $1k → 9%STONINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WI
NY
MA
PA
CT
RI
UT
AZ
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$442k · 25 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
17

Total granted

$442k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
0%

Still filing today

88%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Maine Island Trail Association
    9× · 2017–2025 · $47k · revenue +55%
  • Maine Coast Heritage Trust
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +106%
  • TM
    THE MAURICE C LA GRUA CENTER
    8× · 2018–2025 · $39k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • RC
    Riverflow Community Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • RA
    RAGNOT AMATEUR SAILING ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue -90%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
2
Islesboro Islands Trust

The mission of Islesboro Islands Trust is to enhance the quality of residents' lives through the preservation of open space, educate all residents as to the value of the island's natural ecosystems, and act as an environmental advocate on…

Philanthropy
3
Somerset Woods Trustees

To conserve lands with significant ecological or cultural resources and manage them in a sustainable way for public benefit.

Environment
4
Midcoast Conservancy

The mission of Midcoast Conservancy is to protect vital lands and waters on a scale that matters and to inspire wonder and action on behalf of all species and the Earth.

Environment
5
Westport Land Conservation Trust Inc

To preserve and protect westport massachusetts natural resources for people and nature, and to educate the public about the wise use of natural resources.

Environment
6
Land Conservancy of Ridgefield Inc

The Land Conservancy of Ridgefield, Inc. ("the Land Conservancy"), founded in 1967, preserves and protects, for the general benefit of the public, Ridgefield, Connecticut's natural resources including land and water resources, the plant…

Environment
7
Lyme Land Conservation Trust Inc

Conservation of lyme's natural, scenic and historic land & water resources.

Environment
8
Wilton Land Conservation Trust

Protecting, enhancing and conserving open spaces encompassing meadows, woodlands, wetlands, and waterways in the town of wilton ct.

Environment
9
Maine Maritime Museum

To connect people to the past, present, and future of Maine's waterways and their global reach.

Arts & Culture
10
Aspetuck Land Trust

Founded in 1966, Aspetuck Land Trust is a non-profit membership ogranization whose mission is to protect land forever and connect people to the natural world.

Environment
11
Newburyport Maritime Society Inc

To protect, preserve and interpret the martime heritage of the lower Merrimack Valley region and how it relates to American History

Arts & Culture
12
Kennebunk Land Trust

Kennebunk Land Trust's mission is to permanently conserve and steward land to benefit natural and human communities.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Native Plant Trust Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ragnot Amateur Sailing Association of Texas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
18/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OCEAN COMMUNITY YMCA - MYSTIC BRANCH: $36,500 · OtherOCEAN COMMUNITY YMCA - MYSTIC BRANCHNEW ENGLAND SCIENCE & SAILING: $34,000 · OtherNEW ENGLAND SCIENCE & SAILINGCHRIST CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherCHRIST CHURCHMaine Seacoast Mission: $8,000 · OtherRAGNOT AMATEUR SAILING ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS: $7,500 · OtherSTONINGTON CEMETERY ASSOCIATION INC: $6,000 · OtherJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $11,000 · OtherJUDICIAL WATCH INCWESTERLY AREA REST MEALS (WARM) INC: $10,000 · OtherWESTERLY AREA REST MEALS (WARM) INCLifeFlight Foundation: $7,000 · Other+18 more: $44,500 · Other+18 moreMaine Island Trail Association: $47,000 · EnvironmentMaine Island Trail Associatio…Maine Coast Heritage Trust: $45,000 · EnvironmentMaine Coast Heritage TrustDENISON PEQUOTSEPOS NATURE CENTER: $34,000 · EnvironmentDENISON PEQUOTSEPOS NATURE CE…NATIVE PLANT TRUST INC: $5,000 · Environment+3 more: $3,000 · EnvironmentTHE STONINGTON FREE LIBRARY INC: $70,500 · EducationTHE STONINGTON …+2 more: $2,000 · EducationTHE OCEAN COMMUNITY UNITED THEATRE INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureTHE OCEAN COM…THE EPOCH TIMES ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureTHE EPOCH TIM…YELLOW FARMHOUSE EDUCATION CENTER INC: $8,000 · Arts & CultureYELLOW FARMHO…MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC: $7,000 · Arts & CultureMYSTIC SEAPOR…STONINGTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureSTONINGTON HI…THE MAURICE C LA GRUA CENTER: $39,000 · PhilanthropySTONINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesRiverflow Community Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesHONEYBEE HOLLOW CHILDRENS CENTER: $1,500 · Human ServicesBRASS: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsMUDRATZ INCORPORATED: $4,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$174,500Environment$134,000Education$72,500Arts & Culture$60,000Philanthropy$39,000Human Services$24,000Recreation & Sports$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE STONINGTON FREE LIBRARY INC: $70,500 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetMaine Island Trail Association: $47,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetMaine Coast Heritage Trust: $45,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MAURICE C LA GRUA CENTER: $39,000 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetDENISON PEQUOTSEPOS NATURE CENTER: $34,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHE OCEAN COMMUNITY UNITED THEATRE INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE EPOCH TIMES ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTONINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $12,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $11,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERLY AREA REST MEALS (WARM) INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBRASS: $10,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetRiverflow Community Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetMaine Seacoast Mission: $8,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYELLOW FARMHOUSE EDUCATION CENTER INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetRAGNOT AMATEUR SAILING ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS: $7,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetLifeFlight Foundation: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTONINGTON CEMETERY ASSOCIATION INC: $6,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetCommunity of Hope Incorporated: $5,500 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetNATIVE PLANT TRUST INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTONINGTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMUDRATZ INCORPORATED: $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetStonington Village Improvement Assoc Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS CONNECTICUT INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHONEYBEE HOLLOW CHILDRENS CENTER: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALLIANCE TO PROTECT NANTUCKET SOUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREENFIELD CENTER SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTONINGTON LAND TRUST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMONADNOCK HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWellesley College: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE STONINGTON FREE LIBRARY INC ↗
  • Who funds Maine Island Trail Association ↗
  • Who funds Maine Coast Heritage Trust ↗
  • Who funds THE MAURICE C LA GRUA CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DENISON PEQUOTSEPOS NATURE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE OCEAN COMMUNITY UNITED THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EPOCH TIMES ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds STONINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTERLY AREA REST MEALS (WARM) INC ↗
  • Who funds BRASS ↗
  • Who funds Riverflow Community Inc ↗
  • Who funds Maine Seacoast Mission ↗
  • Who funds YELLOW FARMHOUSE EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds RAGNOT AMATEUR SAILING ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds LifeFlight Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds STONINGTON CEMETERY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Community of Hope Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE PLANT TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds STONINGTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds MUDRATZ INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MADISON CONSERVATION SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Stonington Village Improvement Assoc Inc ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds HONEYBEE HOLLOW CHILDRENS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE TO PROTECT NANTUCKET SOUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chelsea Groton FoundationCT19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chelsea Groton Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Dxn Foundation · Castle Family Foundation · The Michael & Dudley Delbalso Charitable Trust · Royce Family Fund Inc · Connecticut Humanities Council Inc · Fromson Foundation Inc · The James P Verhalen Family Fdn Inc · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Ibm International Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tua Benson P Blake Char Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tua Benson P Blake Char Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Riverflow Community Inc: 43% of income from government
  • Special Olympics Connecticut Inc: 42% of income from government
  • Yellow Farmhouse Education Center Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Mystic Seaport Museum Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Native Plant Trust Inc: 3% of income from government
  • The Stonington Free Library Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Stonington Village Improvement Assoc Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Wellesley College: 1% of income from government
  • Denison Pequotsepos Nature Center: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tua Benson P Blake Char Trust?

Find your warmest path to Tua Benson P Blake Char Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tua Benson P Blake Char’s filings →

More from the funding graph