Skip to content

· Public charity

Trust Ud Charities Inc Dated 52670

To help underprivileged individuals in and around greenville, south carolina.

$146k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$172kPhilanthropy$82kHuman Services$38kRecreation & Sports$26kHousing & Shelter$20kArts & Culture$17kScience & Tech$16kCommunity Improvement$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $132,562, the rows itemized in this filing. The $146,062 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $13,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $117k
$12,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN$25,000
Individual grant recipient$18,762
UPSTATE CAROLINA ADAPTIVE GOLF$15,600
BRIDGED INC$15,000
YMCA OF GREENVILLE$12,000
PLEASANT VALLEY CONNECTION INC$11,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - SC$10,000
ST ANTHONY OF PADUA CATHOLIC CHURCH$10,000
SC CHILDREN'S THEATER$8,700
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF NEGRO WOMEN$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PLEASANT VALLEY CONNECTION INC: $11k → 10%UPSTATE CAROLINA ADAPTIVE GOLF: $16k → 10%UPSTATE CAROLINA ADAPTIVE GOLF: $10k → 10%YMCA OF GREENVILLE: $12k → 10%YMCA OF GREENVILLE: $12k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$282k · 6 repeat orgs$116k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

$282k
$30k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $86k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CIVITAN INTERNATIONAL
    4× · 2019–2022 · $157k · revenue -15%
  • CC
    CIVITAN CHARITIES OF GREENVILLE SOUTH CAROLINA
    2× · 2017–2018 · $38k
  • UC
    UPSTATE CAROLINA ADAPTIVE GOLF
    2× · 2024–2025 · $26k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • CI
    CIVITAN INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $16k
  • YJ
    YMCA JUDSON COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
2/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CIVITAN CHARITIES OF GREENVILLE SOUTH CAROLINA: $38,412 · OtherCIVITAN CHARITIES OF GREENVILLE SOUTH CAROLINAMEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN: $25,000 · OtherMEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDRENHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - SC: $20,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - SCIndividual grant recipient: $18,762 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSC CHILDREN'S THEATER: $17,400 · OtherSC CHILDREN'S THEATERCIVITAN INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH CENTER: $15,904 · OtherCIVITAN INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH CENTERST ANTHONYS CHURCH-SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherST ANTHONYS CHURCH-SCHOOLYMCA JUDSON COMMUNITY CENTER: $7,500 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $6,570 · OtherNATIONAL COUNCIL OF NEGRO WOMEN: $6,500 · OtherCIVITAN INTERNATIONAL: $156,848 · PhilanthropyCIVITAN INTERNATIONALUPSTATE CAROLINA ADAPTIVE GOLF: $25,600 · Human ServicesUPSTATE CAROLINA …YMCA OF GREENVILLE: $24,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF GREENVILL…PLEASANT VALLEY CONNECTION: $11,000 · Human ServicesPLEASANT VALLEY C…Bridged Inc: $15,000 · Education
Other$166,048Philanthropy$156,848Human Services$60,600Education$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCIVITAN INTERNATIONAL: $156,848 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetUPSTATE CAROLINA ADAPTIVE GOLF: $25,600 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetMEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYMCA OF GREENVILLE: $24,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBridged Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 16% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CIVITAN INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds UPSTATE CAROLINA ADAPTIVE GOLF ↗
  • Who funds MEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF GREENVILLE ↗
  • Who funds Bridged Inc ↗
  • Who funds PLEASANT VALLEY CONNECTION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Francis Hospital IncSC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Francis Hospital Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Trust Ud Charities Inc Dated 52670 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Trust Ud Charities Inc Dated 52670. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Trust Ud Charities Inc Dated 52670’s filings →

    More from the funding graph