Skip to content

· Private foundation

Trust U W Rita Farrant 1215541708

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$82k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$367kHousing & Shelter$42kReligion$26kHuman Services$24kRecreation & Sports$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kAnimals$2k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $56k
$3,581
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$19,695
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$18,621
ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION$17,905
OUR LADY OF VICTORY HOMES OF CHARITY$7,162
CENTRAL ASSOC OF THE MIRACULOUS MEDAL$7,162
THE SALVATION ARMY$3,581
CHILDREN'S LEUKEMIA RESEARCH ASSOCIATION$3,581
GLENS FALLS ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND$1,790
AMERICAN RED CROSS$716
ST MARY'S - ST PAUL'S CATHOLIC CHURCH$716
HIGH PEAKS HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE$358
SPCA OF UPSTATE NY$358
THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC$358
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC: $2k → 7%HIGH PEAKS HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE: $861 → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $896 → 14%THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC: $448 → 7%HIGH PEAKS HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE: $448 → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $861 → 14%THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC: $388 → 7%HIGH PEAKS HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE: $388 → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $775 → 14%THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC: $358 → 7%HIGH PEAKS HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE: $358 → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $716 → 14%THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC: $260 → 7%CARITAS INC: $1k → 10%HIGH PEAKS HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE: $260 → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $519 → 14%THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC: $215 → 7%HIGH PEAKS HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE: $215 → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $431 → 14%CARITAS INC: $992 → 10%CARITAS INC: $646 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$478k · 15 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
1

Total granted

$478k
$8k

Still filing today

53%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $109k · revenue +53%
  • AF
    ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $105k · revenue +7%
  • CL
    Childrens Leukemia Research Assn Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • CA
    CENT ASSOC OF THE MIRACULOUS MEDAL
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cardiology Foundation of New York
Health
2
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
3
The Cardiovascular Medical Research and Education Fund Inc
—
4
Holy Redeemer Health System

As a catholic health system, rooted in the tradition of the sisters of the holy redeemer, we care, comfort and heal, following the example of jesus, proclaiming the hope god offers in the midst of human struggle.

Health
5
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
6
Stroke Outcomes and Continuum of Ca
Health
7
Holy Redeemer Visiting Nurse Agency Inc

As a catholic health system, rooted in the tradition of the sisters of the holy redeemer, we care, comfort and heal, following the example of jesus, proclaiming the hope god offers in the midst of human struggle.our professional nurses and…

Health
8
St Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s

To continue christ's healing love through delivery of competent & compassionate healthcare in an environment sensitive to the needs of all people. the hospital is committed to providing a broad range of quality inpatient and outpatient…

Health
9
Independent Health Association Inc

Provides health-related products and services that enable affordable access to quality health care.

Health
10
Northwell Health Cancer Institute Inc

Northwell health cancer institute is part of northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
11
Critical Path Institute

The critical path institute is a catalyst in the development of new approaches that advance medical innovation and regulatory science. this is achieved by leading teams that share data, knowledge and expertise resulting in sound, consensus…

Health
12
Alzheimers Research Association
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Hospice Inc; the most unlike its peers is Glens Falls Association Ft Blind. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $115,437 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYOUR LADY OF VICTORY HOMES OF CHARITY INC: $41,976 · OtherOUR LADY OF VICTORY HOMES OF CHARITY INCCENTRAL ASSOC OF THE MIRACULOUS: $21,873 · OtherCENTRAL ASSOC OF THE MIRACULOUSChildrens Leukemia Research Assn Inc: $20,989 · OtherChildrens Leukemia Research Assn IncTHE SALVATION ARMY: $20,989 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYTHE CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF THE MIRACULOUS MEDAL: $12,353 · OtherGLENS FALLS ASSOCIATION FT BLIND: $10,494 · Other+3 more: $14,048 · Other+3 moreAmerican Heart Association Inc: $109,141 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $104,943 · HealthARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INCAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $4,198 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC: $3,462 · Human ServicesCaritas Incorporated DBA Nearcare: $2,981 · Human ServicesHIGH PEAKS HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE IN: $2,530 · Human Services
Other$258,159Health$214,084Human Services$13,171

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $109,141 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $104,943 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetChildrens Leukemia Research Assn Inc: $20,989 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetGLENS FALLS ASSOCIATION FT BLIND: $10,494 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $4,198 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC: $3,462 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCaritas Incorporated DBA Nearcare: $2,981 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetHIGH PEAKS HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE IN: $2,530 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Childrens Leukemia Research Assn Inc ↗
  • Who funds GLENS FALLS ASSOCIATION FT BLIND ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds Caritas Incorporated DBA Nearcare ↗
  • Who funds HIGH PEAKS HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE IN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Trust U W Rita Farrant 1215541708 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Trust U W Rita Farrant 1215541708. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Trust U W Rita Farrant 1215541708’s filings →

    More from the funding graph