Skip to content

· Private foundation

Trust for the Benefit of Charitable

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$163kHealth$87kScience & Tech$30kEducation$26kReligion$12kPhilanthropy$5kYouth Development$3kSocial Science$3k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$4,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$938k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
METROPOLITAN OPERA ASSOCIATION$16,000
YIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH$5,000
MUSICOPIA$5,000
WAGNER FREE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE$5,000
STUDENT PARTNER ALLIANCE$4,000
SESAME WORKSHOP$3,500
OPERA CAROLINA$3,500
GLIMMERGLAS OPERA$3,500
PORTLAND OPERA ASSOC INC$3,000
OPERA COMPANY OF PHILADELPHIA$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WAGNER FREE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE: $6k → 22%HIDDEN GENIUS PROJECT: $3k → 10%GLIMMERGLAS OPERA: $4k → 13%YIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH: $5k → 17%PORTLAND OPERA ASSOC INC: $4k → 12%OPERA CAROLINA: $4k → 10%STUDENT PARTNER ALLIANCE: $5k → 10%HETRICK MARTIN INSTITUTE: $3k → 16%WAGNER FREE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE: $5k → 22%YIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH: $3k → 17%PORTLAND OPERA ASSOC INC: $3k → 12%STUDENT PARTNER ALLIANCE: $5k → 10%WAGNER FREE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE: $5k → 22%YIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH: $3k → 17%PORTLAND OPERA ASSOC INC: $3k → 12%STUDENT PARTNER ALLIANCE: $4k → 10%WAGNER FREE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE: $5k → 22%GAY MENS HEALTH CRISIS INC: $2k → 17%PORTLAND OPERA ASSOC INC: $3k → 12%STUDENT PARTNER ALLIANCE: $4k → 10%WAGNER FREE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE: $3k → 22%METROPOLITAN OPERA ASSOCIATION: $20k → 17%STUDENT PARTNER ALLIANCE: $4k → 10%WAGNER FREE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE: $3k → 22%METROPOLITAN OPERA ASSOCIATION: $20k → 17%STUDENT PARTNER ALLIANCE: $4k → 10%WAGNER FREE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE: $3k → 22%METROPOLITAN OPERA ASSOCIATION: $16k → 17%MUSICOPIA: $6k → 22%METROPOLITAN OPERA ASSOCIATION: $13k → 17%MUSICOPIA: $5k → 22%METROPOLITAN OPERA ASSOCIATION: $12k → 17%MUSICOPIA: $5k → 22%METROPOLITAN OPERA ASSOCIATION: $12k → 17%MUSICOPIA: $5k → 22%METROPOLITAN OPERA ASSOCIATION: $10k → 17%MUSICOPIA: $5k → 22%MUSICOPIA: $5k → 22%SESAME WORKSHOP: $4k → 17%HADASSAH WOMEN'S ZIONIST ORG OF AMERICA: $20k → 17%MUSICOPIA: $3k → 22%HADASSAH: $15k → 17%HADASSAH WOMEN'S ZIONIST ORG OF AMERICA: $15k → 17%HADASSAH: $10k → 17%HADASSAH WOMEN'S ZIONIST ORG OF AMERICA: $5k → 17%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IRVING: $10k → 17%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IRVING: $5k → 17%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IRVING: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$299k · 9 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$299k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+47%

Still filing today

56%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MI
    MUSICOPIA INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $34k · revenue +308%
  • WF
    WAGNER FREE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $30k · revenue +43%
  • YI
    YIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $11k · revenue +130%

Funded once

  • AS
    AAUW-WA SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -24%
  • HM
    HETRICK MARTIN INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • HG
    HIDDEN GENIUS PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +149%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Opera Association

We believe opera is a uniquely compelling, entertaining and emotionally thrilling art form. our mission is to bring together growing audiences to experience opera's transformative power.

Arts & Culture
2
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
3
Opera On Tap

To bring traditional opera and newly commissioned opera to new audiences in non-traditional venues and to give opera performance singing opportunities. to teach the beauty of opera to elementary school children

Arts & Culture
4
Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture
5
Arizona Opera Company

Arizona opera elevates the transformative power of storytelling through music - cultivating community and strengthening a state and people as adventurous and diverse as the place they call home.

Arts & Culture
6
New York City Opera

New york city opera was famously dubbed "the people's opera" by mayor fiorello laguardia at its founding in 1943. more than 80 years later, city opera continues its historic mission to inspire audiences with innovative and theatrically…

Arts & Culture
7
Princeton Symphony Orchestra Inc

The mission of the princeton symphony orchestra is to leverage the power of live music to uplift the human experience.

Arts & Culture
8
Foundation for Modern Opera
—
9
Women's Project & Productions Inc

Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…

Arts & Culture
10
Opera America Inc

Opera america, inc. ("opera america") was founded to: (i) promote growth and expansion of the operatic art form; (ii) foster and improve the education, training and development of operatic composers, singers and allied talent (iii) assist…

Arts & Culture
11
The Opera Association of Central Ohio

Opera columbus enriches central ohio by educating, enlightening, and entertaining people of all ages and backgrounds through the live music theatre experience by employing a diverse and far-flung supply of creative talent, ideas and…

Arts & Culture
12
San Diego Opera Association

Mission: the mission of san diego opera is to deliver exceptional performances and exciting, accessible programs to diverse audiences, focusing on community partnerships, and the transformative and expressive power of the human voice. as…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Metropolitan Opera Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sesame Workshop. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Metropolitan Opera Association Inc: $102,500 · Arts & CultureMetropolitan Opera Association IncMUSICOPIA INC: $33,628 · Arts & CultureMUSICOPIA INCPORTLAND OPERA ASSOCIATION INC: $12,000 · Arts & CulturePORTLAND OPERA ASSOCIATION INC+3 more: $9,000 · Arts & Culture+3 moreHADASSAH WOMEN'S ZIONIST ORG OF AMERICA: $40,000 · OtherHADASSAH WOMEN'S ZIONIST ORG OF AMERICAWAGNER FREE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE: $29,500 · OtherWAGNER FREE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCESTUDENT PARTNER ALLIANCE: $25,500 · OtherSTUDENT PARTNER ALLIANCEHADASSAH: $25,000 · OtherHADASSAHCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IRVING: $20,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IRVING+4 more: $9,100 · Other+4 moreYIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH INC: $11,000 · ReligionAAUW-WA SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND: $5,000 · PhilanthropyHIDDEN GENIUS PROJECT: $2,500 · EducationGAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISIS INC: $2,407 · Health
Arts & Culture$157,128Other$149,100Religion$11,000Philanthropy$5,000Education$2,500Health$2,407

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMetropolitan Opera Association Inc: $102,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMUSICOPIA INC: $33,628 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetWAGNER FREE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE: $29,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetPORTLAND OPERA ASSOCIATION INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAAUW-WA SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetOPERA CAROLINA: $3,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSESAME WORKSHOP: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIDDEN GENIUS PROJECT: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISIS INC: $2,407 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERA PHILADELPHIA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Metropolitan Opera Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds MUSICOPIA INC ↗
  • Who funds WAGNER FREE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds PORTLAND OPERA ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds AAUW-WA SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND ↗
  • Who funds OPERA CAROLINA ↗
  • Who funds SESAME WORKSHOP ↗
  • Who funds HIDDEN GENIUS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds GAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISIS INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERA PHILADELPHIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Trust for the Benefit of Charitable funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Trust for the Benefit of Charitable. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Portland Opera Association Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Trust for the Benefit of Charitable’s filings →

More from the funding graph