Skip to content

· Public charity

Troy Redevelopment Foundation Inc

To enable not-for-profit institutions located in the city of troy to financially assist and otherwise assist the city of troy; to foster economic development and to assist the city of troy in solving urban problems; and, to provide the city of troy funds to be used to enhance economic development and formulate educational programs which…

$1.1M
Granted FY2023
15
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$392k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Public Benefit$1.5MArts & Culture$556kCommunity Improvement$155kHousing & Shelter$100kRecreation & Sports$99kYouth Development$66kCivil Rights$63kEnvironment$20kOther$0
02FY2023 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $178k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $236k
  • $250k+2 grants · $642k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$476k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF TROY NEW YORK$391,900
CITY OF TROY NEW YORK$250,000
COMM ON ECONMC OPP FOR GTR CR$100,000
CONTEMP CIRCUS AND IMRSV ARTS$85,800
IN OUR OWN VOICES INC$50,000
RENSSELAER CTY HISTORICAL SOC$40,000
TROY SAVINGS BANK MUSIC HALL$35,000
HUDSON MOHAWK INDUSTRIAL GTWY$20,000
TROY BUSINESS IMPRVMNT DSTRCT$20,000
RENS CO CHMBR OF CMRCE$20,000
CAP DISTR TRANS COUNCIL$12,500
CAPITAL ROOTS INC$10,000
MEDIA ALLIANCE INC$10,000
TROY YOUTH ASSOCIATION INC$10,000
COLLAR WORKS INC$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COLLAR WORKS INC: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 5 repeat orgs$427k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +297% since the first grant, against +74% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$2.1M
$101k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+297%
+74%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $325k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ARTS CENTER OF THE CAPITAL REGION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $199k · revenue +119%
  • TS
    TROY SAVINGS BANK MUSIC HALL CORPORATION
    3× · 2020–2023 · $125k · revenue +567%
  • RC
    RENSSELAER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $65k · revenue +297%

Funded once

  • LB
    LANSINGBURGH BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $56k · revenue +74%
  • TD
    TROY DWNTWN CLBRTV INC
    one grant, 2022 · $45k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rochester Contemporary Art Center Inc

To create dialogue and build community through contemporary art exhibitions and related programs

Arts & Culture
2
Columbus Area Arts Council Inc

To enhance the quality of life in the community by stimulating community interest in art, fostering creation and inquiry throughout columbus, and leading a vibrant arts culture tied to our unique history.

Arts & Culture
3
Rochester Art Center

Rochester art center offers the opportunity for all people to understand and value the arts through innovative experiences with contemporary art. through world-class exhibitions and programs, we present a welcoming, integrated, and diverse…

Arts & Culture
4
The Bronx Council On the Arts Incorporated

A pioneering advocate for cultural equity, the bronx council on the arts nurtures the development of diverse artists and arts organizations and build strong cultural connections in and beyond the bronx.

Arts & Culture
5
Saratoga Arts Inc

Saratoga arts was established to enrich the region by cultivating a vibrant arts community and by ensuring that the arts are accessible to all.

Arts & Culture
6
Cny Arts Inc

CNY Arts' mission is to promote, support, and celebrate arts and culture in Central New York.

Arts & Culture
7
Albany Center Galleries Inc

To promote and exhibit contemporary visual art produced by emerging and established artist living primarily in the region and to inspire interest and provide enjoyment to an increasingly diverse audience.

Arts & Culture
8
Lawrence Arts Center Inc

The mission of the lawrence arts center is to create meaningful arts experiences with and for the community through education, exhibitions, and performances.

Arts & Culture
9
Coleman Center Board of the City of York Term

The coleman center for the arts, cca, is a contemporary arts organization that uses art to foster positive social change, answer civic needs, build local pride, and use creativity for community problem solving.

Arts & Culture
10
Rockport Cultural Arts District

Bring recognition to the cultural arts and promote economic and cultural development in the downtown rockport area.

Arts & Culture
11
Arts Council of Rock Hill and York County Inc

To create arts programming that encourages education, economic development and arts advocacy through unique art experiences that engage the community to make york county a regional arts destination. it is the vision of the arts council of…

—
12
Central New York Community Arts Council Inc

Through live performances, theatrical events and educational avenues, the stanley theatre, operated by the central new york community arts council, remains the center for excellence in the arts, community engagement and economic stability…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Troy Savings Bank Music Hall Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Lansingburgh Boys & Girls Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
6/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF TROY NEW YORK: $1,707,070 · OtherCITY OF TROY NEW YORKTROY SAVINGS BANK MUSIC HALL CORPORATION: $125,000 · OtherTROY SAVINGS BANK MUSIC HALL CORPORATION+5 more: $168,209 · Other+5 moreTHE ARTS CENTER OF THE CAPITAL REGION: $198,500 · Arts & CultureTHE ARTS CENTER …CONTEMPORARY CIRCUS AND IMMERSIVE ARTS CENTER: $85,800 · Arts & CultureCONTEMPORARY CIR…RENSSELAER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $65,000 · Arts & CultureRENSSELAER COUNT…HUDSON MOHAWK INDUSTRIAL GATEWAY: $20,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY FOR THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION INC: $100,000 · Community ImprovementIN OUR OWN VOICES INC: $50,000 · Civil RightsCAPITAL ROOTS INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentTroy Youth Association Inc: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOLLAR WORKS INC: $7,000 · Human Services
Other$2,000,279Arts & Culture$379,300Community Improvement$100,000Civil Rights$50,000Environment$10,000Youth Development$10,000Human Services$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ARTS CENTER OF THE CAPITAL REGION: $198,500 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetTROY SAVINGS BANK MUSIC HALL CORPORATION: $125,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetCOMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY FOR THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCONTEMPORARY CIRCUS AND IMMERSIVE ARTS CENTER: $85,800 over 1y, 56% of budgetRENSSELAER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $65,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetLANSINGBURGH BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $56,209 over 1y, 14% of budgetIN OUR OWN VOICES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetRENSSELAER COUNTY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $34,500 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetDISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOC DOWNTOWN TROY BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DIST INC: $20,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetHUDSON MOHAWK INDUSTRIAL GATEWAY: $20,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetCAPITAL ROOTS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTroy Youth Association Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetMEDIA ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetCOLLAR WORKS INC: $7,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The McCarthy Charities IncNY28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The McCarthy Charities Inc · The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · The Howard and Bush Foundation Inc · Stephen J McKee Foundation · The Troy Savings Bank Charitable Fo · Capital District Physicians' Health Plan Inc · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Tw Lucille a Herold -Co-Trustee 26-209270 · Kiwi Foundation · The Bender Family Foundation · Preservation League of New York State

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Troy Redevelopment Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Troy Redevelopment Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Troy Redevelopment Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Troy Redevelopment Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Troy Redevelopment’s filings →

    More from the funding graph