Skip to content
Trivisonno Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Trivisonno Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Animals$69kRecreation & Sports$61kArts & Culture$32kYouth Development$16kHealth$13kEnvironment$8kReligion$5kCommunity Improvement$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$11k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LITTLE STONE CHURCH$2,500
UP STATE FAIR EQUINE DEPARTMENT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 49% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%YOUTH AMERICA GRAND PRIX: $1k → 17%ANIMAL RESCUE COALITION: $15k → 9%ASOLO THEATER INC: $5k → 10%EQUESTRAIN AID FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB TAMPA BAY: $5k → 13%AMERICAN LEGION POST 374: $1k → 8%MACKINAC ASSOCIATES: $6k → 9%CHERRYLAND HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 10%UP STATE FAIR EQUINE DEPARTMENT: $1k → 13%EVA BURRELL ANIMAL SHELTER: $3k → 13%WAWASHKAMO GOLF CLUB: $16k → 14%DETROIT HORSE POWER: $2k → 21%ANIMAL RESCUE COALITION: $15k → 9%ASOLO REPERTORY THEATER: $5k → 10%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB TAMPA: $1k → 13%UP STATE FAIR CHARITY: $1k → 8%MACKINAC ASSOCIATES: $3k → 9%SCHOOLCRAFT COUNTY CLAY BUSTERS: $3k → 13%WAWASHKAMO GOLF CLUB: $13k → 14%DETROIT HORSE POWER: $2k → 21%ANIMAL RESCUE COALITION: $14k → 9%MACKINAC ASSOCIATES: $3k → 9%SCHOOLCRAFT COUNTY CLAY BUSTERS: $1k → 13%WAWASHKAMO GOLF CLUB: $5k → 14%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $6k → 21%ANIMAL RESCUE COALITION: $10k → 9%MACKINAC ASSOCIATES: $1k → 9%EVA BURRELL ANIMAL SHELTER: $1k → 13%MACKINAC ISLAND MEDICAL CENTER: $5k → 14%ANIMAL RESCUE COALITION: $10k → 9%MACKINAC HORSEMEN'S ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%RESILIENT RETREAT: $3k → 9%MACKINAC HORSEMEN'S ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%RESILIENT RETREAT: $2k → 9%MACKINAC HORSEMEN'S ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%RESILIENT RETREAT: $1k → 9%WAWASHKAMO GOLF CLUB: $4k → 14%MACKINAC ISLAND MEDICAL: $4k → 14%FOURTY CAROTS: $7k → 9%MACKINAC HORESEMAN'S ASSOCIATES: $3k → 14%FORTY CARROTS: $1k → 9%MACKINAC ARTS COUNCIL: $3k → 14%CONSERVATION FOUNDATION GULF COAST: $8k → 9%LITTLE STONE CHURCH: $3k → 14%MACKINAC ARTS COUNCIL: $3k → 14%MACKINAC ARTS COUNCIL: $2k → 14%WAWASHKAMO GOLD CLUB: $2k → 14%LITTLE STONE CHURCH: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$162k · 11 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +133% since the first grant, against +74% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
18

Total granted

$162k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+133%
+74%

Still filing today

82%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsHealthYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AR
    Animal Rescue Coalition Inc
    5× · 2019–2023 · $64k · revenue +223%
  • WG
    WAWASHKAMO GOLF CLUB
    5× · 2019–2023 · $40k · revenue +183%
  • MA
    MACKINAC ASSOCIATES
    5× · 2020–2024 · $13k · revenue +171%

Funded once

  • CF
    CONSERVATION FOUNDATION GULF COAST
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $7k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Animal Rescue League

The mission of the michigan animal rescue league is to provide the highest quality of life to dogs and cats through rescue, medical care, socialization and behavioral support, short- and long-term sanctuary, adoption, and community…

Animals
2
Michigan Anti-Cruelty Society

To maintain and operate a hospital, ambulance and veterinary services for the care of animals. the maintenance and operation of kennels and suitable chambers for the humane destruction of wounded animals.

Animals
3
Mcpaws Inc

Transforming lives by strengthening the human-animal connection.

Animals
4
Humane Society at Lakewood Ranch Inc

To offer a safe environment and shelter for companion animals including medical care, vaccinations, and micro-chipping by loving and caring individuals, until we can adopt them into a new suitable home. We do this with 100% private…

Animals
5
Humane Society & Animal Rescue of Muskegon County

To shelter and find forever homes for homeless dogs and cats.

Animals
6
Michigan Animal Health Foundation

To provide financial assistance to individuals and institutions for educational and scientific purposes in order to advance science to benefit the health and welfare of animals.

Animals
7
Mackinac Island Community Foundation

The mackinac island community foundation promotes the general well-being of island residents and visitors, by working in community partnerships to generate endowed and un-endowed funds and stimulate community-wide initiatives.

Philanthropy
8
Marine Mammals of Maine

To rescue injured, sick and abandoned marine mammals and to educate the public about what to do if they find one of these marine mammals.

Arts & Culture
9
Michigan Recreation & Park Association

A member driven organization committed to providing quality professional park and recreation programs and services with fiscal integrity and progressive leadership to michigans recreation and parks trade.

—
10
30A Cats

Feline Trap, Neuter & Release and Rescue

Animals
11
Animal Resource Center

To foster access to veterinary and other care for animals

Animals
12
Humane Society of Bay County Inc

To prevent cruelty to animals, provide humane education, and relief to suffering animals

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Impact 100 Srq Inc; the most unlike its peers is Child Protection Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Animal Rescue Coalition Inc: $63,500 · AnimalsAnimal Rescue Coalition IncEVA BURRELL ANIMAL SHELTER: $4,000 · AnimalsEVA BURRELL ANIMAL SHELTER+1 more: $1,000 · AnimalsWAWASHKAMO GOLF CLUB: $40,100 · Arts & CultureWAWASHKAMO GOLF CLUBMACKINAC ARTS COUNCIL: $7,750 · Arts & CultureMACKINAC ARTS COUNCILASOLO THEATRE INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureASOLO THEATRE INC+1 more: $1,500 · Arts & CultureCONSERVATION FOUNDATION GULF COAST: $7,500 · OtherCONSERVATION FOUNDATION …Individual grant recipient: $6,650 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $6,350 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBASOLO REPERTORY THEATER: $5,000 · OtherASOLO REPERTORY THEATERLITTLE STONE CHURCH: $5,000 · OtherLITTLE STONE CHURCHSCHOOLCRAFT COUNTY CLAY BUSTERS: $3,500 · OtherSCHOOLCRAFT COUNTY CLAY …Individual grant recipient: $3,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…MACKINAC HORESEMAN'S ASSOCIATES: $2,500 · Other+8 more: $7,261 · Other+8 moreMACKINAC HORSEMEN'S ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsRESILIENT RETREAT INC: $6,000 · HealthMACKINAC ISLAND MEDICAL CENTER: $5,000 · HealthEquestrian Aid Foundation: $2,000 · HealthMACKINAC ASSOCIATES: $12,500 · Community ImprovementBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentDETROIT HORSE POWER: $3,500 · Youth Development
Animals$68,500Arts & Culture$54,350Other$47,261Recreation & Sports$15,000Health$13,000Community Improvement$12,500Youth Development$8,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAnimal Rescue Coalition Inc: $63,500 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetWAWASHKAMO GOLF CLUB: $40,100 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetMACKINAC HORSEMEN'S ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetMACKINAC ASSOCIATES: $12,500 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetMACKINAC ARTS COUNCIL: $7,750 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetRESILIENT RETREAT INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMACKINAC ISLAND MEDICAL CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetASOLO THEATRE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVA BURRELL ANIMAL SHELTER: $4,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetDETROIT HORSE POWER: $3,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEquestrian Aid Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetYOUTH AMERICA GRAND PRIX INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT 100 SRQ INC: $1,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD PROTECTION CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHERRYLAND HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN LEGION POST 374: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Animal Rescue Coalition Inc ↗
  • Who funds WAWASHKAMO GOLF CLUB ↗
  • Who funds MACKINAC HORSEMEN'S ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MACKINAC ASSOCIATES ↗
  • Who funds MACKINAC ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds RESILIENT RETREAT INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds MACKINAC ISLAND MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ASOLO THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds EVA BURRELL ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT HORSE POWER ↗
  • Who funds Equestrian Aid Foundation ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH AMERICA GRAND PRIX INC ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT 100 SRQ INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD PROTECTION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHERRYLAND HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEGION POST 374 ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Tromble Family Fo…Richard and Jane Mano…The George G FundMackinac Island Commu…Gulf Coast Community …The Community Foundat…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Network for GoodAmerican Endowment Fo…Paypal Charitable Giv…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…
The Tromble Family FoundationFL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Tromble Family Foundation · Richard and Jane Manoogian Foundation · The George G Fund · Mackinac Island Community Foundation · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Trivisonno Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Trivisonno Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Child Protection Center Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Animal Rescue Coalition Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Resilient Retreat Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Trivisonno’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home