Skip to content

· Private foundation

Trinc It Charity Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$137k
Granted FY2024still arriving
75
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Religion$222kEducation$121kHuman Services$7kFood & Nutrition$4kArts & Culture$1kInternational$720Health$701Youth Development$650Other$0
02FY2024 · 75 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k70 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $78k
$250
Median grant
4
States reached
$191k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
gates of mercy$23,360
kehilla new central$16,500
Individual grant recipient$15,000
Individual grant recipient$13,100
Individual grant recipient$10,500
yeshiva Ateres yisroel$7,800
keren orah$7,500
tzur foundation$6,000
yeshiva shaagas aryeh$4,575
Individual grant recipient$3,300
gemach of jackson$2,550
Tiferes Bachurim$2,550
Individual grant recipient$2,100
kupas yom tov$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,961
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%gemach of jackson: $3k → 11%Gemach of Jackson: $50 → 11%Ein Od Milvado: $100 → 20%Keren Hatzedaka: $790 → 11%keren hatzedaka: $304 → 11%Ahavas Tzedaka: $150 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$242k · 25 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 50 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
49

Total granted

$242k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+9%

Still filing today

28%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’23’24
EducationReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YS
    YESHIVA SHAGAS ARYEH INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $12k · revenue +12%
  • TF
    TZUR FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $10k · revenue +63%
  • KY
    KUPAS YOM TOV INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $4k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC
    one grant, 2023 · $17k · revenue +8%
  • M
    Misc
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • MC
    Miscellaneous Charities
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Yeshiva Nesivos Hatorah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
3
Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
4
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
5
Yeshiva Shaar Hatalmud

Providing jewish education to high school age students.

Education
6
Yeshivas Toras Zev Inc

The purpose of this organization is to support indigent torah scholars and their families by providing stipends and additional funds at jewish holiday times.

Religion
7
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education
8
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
9
Cheder Shiras Hatorah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
10
Mesivta Keren Orah

To conduct and maintain a religious school in accordance with the tenets, traditions and precepts of the orthodox jewish faith.

Education
11
Yeshiva Derech Hatorah-Yeshivat Mizrachi Lbanim

A school-section 170(b)(1)(a)(ii), operating from the preschool pre-k level through high school, and chartered ny the new york state education department and board of regents.

Education
12
Yeshiva Ohr Yehuda Inc

Providing religious and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nesiv Hatorah Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kollel Ohr Shmuel Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 125 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/32
Grantees still filing
17/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION GATES OF MERCY: $81,110 · OtherCONGREGATION GATES OF MERCYIndividual grant recipient: $27,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYeshiva Ateres Yisroel: $24,970 · OtherYeshiva Ateres YisroelKEHILLA NEW CENTRAL INC: $23,568 · OtherKEHILLA NEW CENTRAL INCIndividual grant recipient: $18,080 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $13,100 · Otherkeren orah: $12,500 · Other+91 more: $62,041 · Other+91 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $16,600 · International+1 more: $36 · InternationalTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $10,160 · ReligionKUPAS YOM TOV INC: $3,720 · ReligionKOLLEL OHR SHMUEL INC: $2,250 · Religion+2 more: $160 · ReligionYESHIVA SHAGAS ARYEH INC: $11,725 · EducationNACHLAS BAIS YAAKOV: $1,000 · EducationSHALVA HIGH SCHOOL INC: $500 · Education+9 more: $1,388 · EducationGEMACH OF JACKSON INC: $2,600 · Human ServicesKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $1,094 · Human ServicesAHAVAS TZEDAKA INC: $150 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesNESIVOS INC: $650 · Youth DevelopmentYESHIVA OHR TORAH: $180 · PhilanthropyREFUAH V SIMCHA INC: $150 · PhilanthropyKUPAS CHAIM LEVI INC: $100 · Philanthropy
Other$262,369International$16,636Religion$16,290Education$14,613Human Services$3,944Youth Development$650Philanthropy$430

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $16,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA SHAGAS ARYEH INC: $11,725 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $10,160 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKUPAS YOM TOV INC: $3,720 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGEMACH OF JACKSON INC: $2,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKOLLEL OHR SHMUEL INC: $2,250 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $1,094 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNACHLAS BAIS YAAKOV: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNESIVOS INC: $650 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHALVA HIGH SCHOOL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN SHLOMO: $360 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCATSKILLS HATZALAH INC: $335 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHIRAS RUCHAMA INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA OHR TORAH: $180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA CHAYEI OLAM: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHEMIRAS SEDORIM INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAHAVAS TZEDAKA INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMESIVTA NEZER HATORAH: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFUAH V SIMCHA INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHelp Our Friends Inc: $126 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKUPAS CHAIM LEVI INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMESORAS HATORAH INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNESIV HATORAH INC: $77 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA SHAAREI OORAH INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEZER MIZION: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHASHEM'S CHILDREN INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA SHAGAS ARYEH INC ↗
  • Who funds TZUR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KUPAS YOM TOV INC ↗
  • Who funds GEMACH OF JACKSON INC ↗
  • Who funds KOLLEL OHR SHMUEL INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN HATZEDAKA INC ↗
  • Who funds NACHLAS BAIS YAAKOV ↗
  • Who funds NESIVOS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY45.5× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · Donors Fund Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Jmg Foundation · Jacob and Malka Fischer Foundation · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Oak Knoll Charitable Foundation · David Rosenbaum Family Foundation · Jsp Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Trinc It Charity Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Trinc It Charity Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Mesoras Hatorah Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Chayei Olam: 10% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Shagas Aryeh Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Mesivta Nezer Hatorah: 7% of income from government
  • Nachlas Bais Yaakov: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Trinc It Charity Inc?

Find your warmest path to Trinc It Charity Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 125 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Trinc It Charity’s filings →

More from the funding graph