Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Oak Knoll Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$18k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
States reached
$500
Largest
01What you fund
0178% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$55kEducation$20kArts & Culture$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kHealth$2kHuman Services$2kYouth Development$500Food & Nutrition$350Other$0
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $1,250 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $17,655 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $16,405 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$500
Median grant
States reached
$54k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Yeshiva Gedolah Of Woodridge$500
EOM$500
American Friend Of Kolel Sharei Horaah$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LEV YISROEL: $500 → 6%A TIME: $54 → 20%AHAVAS TZEDAKAH: $500 → 11%BETH OLOTH: $180 → 20%BIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$40k · 27 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +43% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 26 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
116

Total granted

$40k
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+43%

Still filing today

7%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $750 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23
Human ServicesEducationReligionYouth DevelopmentInternationalHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TE
    TIFERES ELIYOHU
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +760%
  • BK
    BAIS KAILA TORAH PREPARATORY HS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $700 · revenue +68%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEER HACHAIM INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $225 · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • T
    TAG
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF BRISK YESHIVA
    one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
3
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

5
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
6
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education
7
Yeshiva Chayei Olam

Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…

Education
8
Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc

Operation of a parochial elementary school, providing education services to students

Education
9
Yeshiva Nesivos Hatorah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
10
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
11
Yeshiva Bais Mordechai of Teaneck

To provide religious Jewish education.

Education
12
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshiva Tiferes Yisroel and the most unlike its peers is Tiferes Eliyohu. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Day SchoolsMulti-Service Community Cen…Jewish Educational Support …Jewish Educational FundingJewish Philanthropic Organi…Jewish Charitable Assistance
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr17%0%5–10yr21%38%10–20yr22%24%20–35yr13%35%35–55yr5%3%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr17%0%5–10yr21%49%10–20yr22%10%20–35yr13%40%35–55yr5%1%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/39
the rest of the field
11%
2,191/19,830

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 145 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TAG — $6,000 · OtherTAGTzur Foundation — $4,760 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $4,600 · OtherFRIENDS OF BRISK YESHIVA — $4,600 · OtherBMG — $4,000 · OtherYESHIVAS EMEK HATORAH INC — $3,600 · OtherTIFERES ACHIM — $3,360 · OtherKZBY — $3,250 · OtherEOM — $3,232 · Other+119 more — $58,841 · Other+119 moreTIFERES ELIYOHU — $2,000 · ReligionOHR LEAMI INC — $250 · ReligionTORAS CHESED INC — $180 · ReligionAHAVAS TZEDAKA INC — $500 · Human ServicesLEV YISROEL — $500 · Human ServicesBIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD INC — $500 · Human ServicesBETH OLOTH — $180 · Human Services+1 more — $54 · Human ServicesYeshiva Tiferes Yisroel — $360 · EducationSHEMIRAS SEDORIM INC — $360 · EducationKEREN EVEN HABOCHEN INC — $360 · EducationMESORAS HATORAH INC — $360 · EducationCHAI LIFELINE INC — $1,018 · HealthNESIVOS INC — $500 · Youth DevelopmentOUR PLACE INC — $250 · Youth DevelopmentAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC — $250 · InternationalOHR NOSSON INC — $250 · Philanthropy
Other$96,243Religion$2,430Human Services$1,734Education$1,440Health$1,018Youth Development$750International$250Philanthropy$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTIFERES ELIYOHU — $2,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC — $1,018 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS KAILA TORAH PREPARATORY HS — $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNESIVOS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN YAD V'EIZER INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAHAVAS TZEDAKA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEV YISROEL — $500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYeshiva Tiferes Yisroel — $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHEMIRAS SEDORIM INC — $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN EVEN HABOCHEN INC — $360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMESORAS HATORAH INC — $360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHR LEAMI INC — $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOHR NOSSON INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR PLACE INC — $250 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEER HACHAIM INC — $225 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTORAS CHESED INC — $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETH OLOTH — $180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYAD EZRA — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV OHEL ESTHER INC — $72 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange — $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TIFERES ELIYOHU
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC
  • Who funds BAIS KAILA TORAH PREPARATORY HS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donors Fund IncNJ42.1× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donors Fund Inc · The Ojc Fund · The Sorala Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Senior Community Services Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Trinc It Charity Inc · Yes Ben Dovid Foundation Inc · Jacob and Malka Fischer Foundation · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Oak Knoll Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • Mesoras Hatorah Inc11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 145 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $8k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph