Skip to content
Treynor State Bank Community Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Community foundation

Treynor State Bank Community Foundation

The foundation strives to help identify community needs, facilitate educational efforts, and build leaders one individual and one family at a time.

$585k
Granted FY2019
9
Grants FY2019
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2019.

Community Improvement$96kHousing & Shelter$40kArts & Culture$17kHealth$10kHuman Services$10kRecreation & Sports$5kYouth Development$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$5k
02FY2019 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $94,140, the rows itemized in this filing. The $584,660 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $490,520 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $79k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$152k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TIOGA AREA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT$25,000
SW IOWA IMPACT FUND$12,690
DIVIDE COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION$11,450
LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES$10,000
MICAH HOUSE$10,000
DEWITT COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT$10,000
OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
NEIGHBORHOOD CARE CENTER$5,000
RED CROSS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%RED CROSS: $5k → 12%CLINTON YMCA: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$108k · 4 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$108k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-62%
+56%

Still filing today

75%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    TIOGA AREA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $55k · revenue -62%
  • DC
    DEWITT COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
    2× · 2018–2019 · $23k
  • LS
    LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ND
    2× · 2018–2019 · $20k · revenue -100%

Funded once

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DEWITT COUNTY ILLINOIS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • DC
    DIVIDE COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • CC
    CLINTON COMMUNITY YMCAgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +416%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dubuque Community Y

The dubuque community y, utilizing christian principles, creates opportunities for growth, leadership, and empowerment for women, men, and youth by building healthy spirit, mind, and body with emphasis on respect, responsibility, caring,…

Human Services
2
Young Men's Christian Association of Central New Mexico

The mission of the ymca of central new mexico is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build a healthy spirit, mind and body for all. for over 100 years, the ymca of central new mexico has served our community…

—
3
Lincoln Area Ymca Inc

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all. activities include child care; youth development through a variety of youth sports, leadership programs and special needs…

—
4
The Young Mens Christian Association of the Chippewa Valley

Our mission is to build strong kids, strong families, and strong communities. The YMCA of the Chippewa Valley is a community centered association dedicated to building a healthy spirit, mind and body for all people, while maintaining an…

Human Services
5
The Young Men's Christian Association of Monroe Michigan

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build a healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
6
Young Men's Christian Association of Eastern Union County

The ymca of eastern union county d/b/a the gateway family ymca is a community based organization rooted in christian principles and committed to building healthy lives through programs that strengthen spirits, minds and bodies for all.

Human Services
7
Young Mens Christian Association of West San Gabriel Valley

Spiritual, social & physical developmentment of community

Human Services
8
The Young Men's Christian Association of Hastings Nebraska

The hastings family ymca puts christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirits, minds, and bodies for all.

Human Services
9
Trinity Health & Affiliates

Trinity health is committed to preserving and improving the quality of health of the people we serve. our mission is to excel at meeting the needs of the whole person through the provision of quality health care and health related services.

Health
10
Ymca Norfolk Nebraska

Develop and improve the spiritual, social, mental, and physical life of youth, adults, and families through providing a program of education, counseling and personal growth in fitness, wellness, illness, prevention and good health…

Human Services
11
Tri-County Health Center

The mission of Hatton Prairie Village is to provide a welcoming, friendly and spirit-filled home to loved ones who need long term or short term care; excellent care and services by compassionate and highly-skilled employees who treat…

—
12
Rapid City Y M C a

The mission of the ymca of rapid city is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build a healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighborhood Care Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Vault Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TIOGA AREA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $55,000 · OtherTIOGA AREA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONDEWITT COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $23,000 · OtherDEWITT COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ND: $20,000 · OtherLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF NDSW IOWA IMPACT FUND: $12,690 · OtherSW IOWA IMPACT FUNDDIVIDE COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION: $11,450 · OtherDIVIDE COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATIONHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DEWITT COUNTY ILLINOIS INC: $10,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DEWITT COUNTY ILLINOIS INCDIVIDE COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION: $5,350 · OtherCROSBY PARK BOARD: $5,000 · OtherIOWA WESTERN COMM COLLEGE: $5,000 · OtherOpportunity Foundation Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesOpportunity …CLINTON COMMUNITY YMCA: $5,000 · Human ServicesCLINTON COMM…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nat…MICAH HOUSE CORPORATION: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterNEIGHBORHOOD CARE CENTER INC: $5,000 · Community ImprovementTHE VAULT COMMUNITY CENTER: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$147,490Human Services$20,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Community Improvement$5,000Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTIOGA AREA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $55,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ND: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMICAH HOUSE CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOpportunity Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCLINTON COMMUNITY YMCA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VAULT COMMUNITY CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Treynor State Bank Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Treynor State Bank Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Treynor State Bank Community Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Treynor State Bank Community Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Treynor State Bank’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home