Skip to content

· Public charity

Trees Forever Inc

Trees forever mission is to plant and care for trees and the environment by empowering people, building community and promoting stewardship.

$502k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$803kPublic Benefit$114kRecreation & Sports$48kEducation$33kCommunity Improvement$15kYouth Development$12kHealth$11kReligion$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $159,187, the rows itemized in this filing. The $502,139 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $342,952 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $144k
$14,940
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF PEORIA$25,000
THE VILLAGE OF FOREST PARK$22,482
CITY OF GALESBURG$15,000
CITY OF WAUKEGAN ATTN TREASURY DEP$15,000
VILLAGE OF PARK FOREST$14,999
CITY OF COLLINSVILLE$14,940
CITY OF KEWANEE$14,921
MUSCATINE BRANCHING OUT$11,050
VILLAGE OF ORLAND PARK$10,325
WAVERLY TREES FOREVER$8,500
CITY OF STORM LAKE$6,970
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 52% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%CITY OF BELLE PLAINE: $17k → 8%CITY OF WEST BRANCH: $15k → 8%CLAUDE W AND DOLLY AHRENDS FOUNDATI: $10k → 9%CITY OF ELY: $10k → 9%CITY OF PARKERSBURG: $20k → 10%MONROE COUNTY AUDITOR: $19k → 10%STORM LAKE CEMETERY: $10k → 10%MID-IOWA COUNCIL: $12k → 10%CITY OF MAQUOKETA: $12k → 10%CITY OF MONTICELLO: $17k → 11%CITY OF MARSHALLTOWN: $12k → 11%CITY OF MAPLETON: $22k → 11%CITY OF MASON CITY: $20k → 12%MUSCATINE BRANCHING OUT: $11k → 12%CRESTON FFA CHAPTER: $20k → 13%PORT OF FORT MADISON: $10k → 14%NORTH CAMPUS VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ASS: $10k → 14%CITY OF AMES: $10k → 17%WAUKEGAN PARK DISTRICT: $15k → 8%CITY OF KEWANEE: $15k → 9%CITY OF JACKSONVILLE: $15k → 12%CITY OF COLLINSVILLE: $15k → 12%THE VILLAGE OF FOREST PARK: $22k → 14%CITY OF PEORIA: $25k → 14%MOLINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $15k → 15%TREES FOREVER FOUNDATION: $20k → 9%CITY OF MARSHALLTOWN: $10k → 11%CITY OF MASON CITY: $15k → 12%MUSCATINE BRANCHING OUT: $11k → 12%MUSCATINE BRANCHING OUT: $11k → 12%CRESTON FFA CHAPTER: $19k → 13%CITY OF WAUKEGAN ATTN TREASURY DEP: $15k → 8%VILLAGE OF PARK FOREST: $15k → 14%LINN CO TREASURER (LINN CO SEC RD): $17k → 9%CITY OF ELDRIDGE: $12k → 12%MUSCATINE BRANCHING OUT: $11k → 12%VILLAGE OF ORLAND PARK: $10k → 14%CITY OF MARION TREE BOARD: $14k → 9%CITY OF MUSCATINE: $17k → 12%CITY OF MARION TREE BOARD: $12k → 9%MUSCATINE BRANCHING OUT: $11k → 12%MARION PARKS & RECREATION: $10k → 9%MUSCATINE BRANCHING OUT: $11k → 12%CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS: $25k → 9%MUSCATINE BRANCHING OUT: $11k → 12%MUSCATINE BRANCHING OUT: $11k → 12%CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS: $17k → 9%MUSCATINE BRANCHING OUT: $11k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$428k · 11 repeat orgs$618k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
46

Total granted

$428k
$485k

Still filing today

0%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $133k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MB
    MUSCATINE BRANCHING OUT
    9× · 2017–2025 · $99k
  • CO
    City of Waverly Public Library
    9× · 2017–2025 · $72k
  • CO
    CITY OF MARION FIRE DEPARTMEN
    4× · 2017–2022 · $45k

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF MAPLETON
    one grant, 2017 · $22k
  • CO
    CITY OF PARKERSBURG
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • TF
    TREES FOREVER FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +45% · 65% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dmacc Foundation

Receive donations for dmacc.

Education
2
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
3
Clark State College Foundation

The foundation aids and promotes education at clark state college and provides scholarships to its students.

Education
4
Drury University

Drury University is an independent university, church-related, grounded in the liberal arts tradition and committed to personalized education in a community of scholars who value the arts of teaching and learning. (Continued on Schedule O)

Education
5
Clark College District 14 Foundation

Clark college foundation inspires the joy of philanthropy in support of student success and program excellence at clark college.

Education
6
University of Dubuque

The university of dubuque is a private university offering undergraduate, graduate, and theological seminary degrees, and other educational opportunities with the intention of educating and forming the whole person. the university is…

Education
7
Friends of Mchenry County College Foundation

Together with our community we build financial support for student learning and success.

Education
8
Mcdaniel College Inc

Mcdaniel college is a diverse student-centered community committed to excellence in the liberal arts & sciences and professional studies with careful mentoring and attention to the individual. mcdaniel changes lives. we challenge students…

Education
9
Iowa Western Community College Foundation

None

Education
10
Dunwoody College of Technology

Dunwoody college changes lives by building opportunities for graduates to have successful careers, to develop into leaders and entrepreneurs, and to engage in "the better performance of life's duties." quote is from the last will and…

Education
11
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
12
Clarkson University

Clarkson university is an independent, nationally recognized technological university whose faculty of teacher-scholars aspires to offer superior instruction and engage in high-quality research and scholarship in engineering, business,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Moline Community Development Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Claude W & Dolly Ahrens Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MUSCATINE BRANCHING OUT: $99,450 · OtherMUSCATINE BRANCHING OUTCity of Waverly Public Library: $71,500 · OtherCity of Waverly Public LibraryCITY OF MARION FIRE DEPARTMEN: $44,520 · OtherCITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS CEDAR RAPIDS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $41,875 · OtherCRESTON COMM SCHOOLS ACTIVITIES: $38,835 · OtherMACNIDER ART MUSEUM: $34,710 · Other+52 more: $632,005 · Other+52 moreTREES FOREVER FOUNDATION: $19,712 · PhilanthropyClaude W & Dolly Ahrens Foundation: $10,000 · PhilanthropyMAHARISHI INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $9,970 · EducationSOUTHEASTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $9,930 · EducationClarke University of Dubuque Iowa: $6,220 · EducationMOLINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $15,000 · Community ImprovementMID-IOWA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $12,000 · Youth Development
Other$962,895Philanthropy$29,712Education$26,120Community Improvement$15,000Youth Development$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTREES FOREVER FOUNDATION: $19,712 over 1y, 65% of budgetMOLINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $15,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetMID-IOWA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetClaude W & Dolly Ahrens Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMAHARISHI INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $9,970 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $9,930 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetClarke University of Dubuque Iowa: $6,220 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDYERSVILLE COMMERCIAL CLUB: $5,550 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TREES FOREVER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MOLINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MID-IOWA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Claude W & Dolly Ahrens Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Roy J Carver Charitable TrustIA17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Roy J Carver Charitable Trust · Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · The Morton Arboretum · Delta Dental of Iowa Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Greater Cedar Rapids Community Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Dubuque · Quad Cities Community Foundation · American Kennel Club Companion Animal Recovery Corporation · AARP · The National Association for the Exchange of Industrial Resources Inc · Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Trees Forever Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Trees Forever Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Trees Forever’s filings →

    More from the funding graph