Skip to content

Washington · Private foundation

Treeclimber Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
5
Grants FY2025
7
Organizations funded FY2024
29%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$3,900
Largest grant, FY2025
$4,000
Organizations funded a year
3 to 8
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$148k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 29% of the organizations Treeclimber Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 3% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $300 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalHealthEducationPhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving5$13k20%
FY20247$10k29%
FY20236$10k67%
FY20226$10k50%
FY20217$12k43%
FY20207$9k43%
FY20198$9k75%
FY20183$9k33%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$31kInternational$27kHealth$7kHousing & Shelter$5kArts & Culture$4kFood & Nutrition$3kPhilanthropy$3kYouth Development$3kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 19 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 10 recipients with no EIN on record ($20k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Treeclimber Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHopelink: $14,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Family Service: $14,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Near East Refugee Aid: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFacing Homelessness: $5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $4,967 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHuman Rights Initiative of North Texas Inc: $3,050 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwest Harvest Emm: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Seattle Times Community Impact Fund: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSeattle Indian Health Board: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters Of America: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKuow Puget Sound Public Radio: $2,200 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKing County Library System Foundation: $2,118 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTranslifeline DBA Trans Lifeline: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOld Dog Haven: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlliance for Education: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Washington Foundation: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWashington State Jewish Historical Socie: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBellevue Art Museum: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSan Francisco AIDS Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 19.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA20.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · American Gift Fund · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Loeb Family Foundation · Casey Family Programs · United Way of King County · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Treeclimber Foundation with peer funders

About Treeclimber Foundation

How much does Treeclimber Foundation give?
Treeclimber Foundation reported 5 grants totaling $12,500 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 8 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Treeclimber Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (34%), International (30%), Health (8%).
Who are Treeclimber Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Hopelink ($14k), Jewish Family Service ($14k), American Near East Refugee Aid ($9k).
Does Treeclimber Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 29% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Treeclimber Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Treeclimber Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Seattle Foundation, Puget Sound Energy Foundation, American Gift Fund.
Where is Treeclimber Foundation based?
Treeclimber Foundation is based in WA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Treeclimber’s filings →

More from the funding graph