Skip to content

· Private foundation

Traditional Medicinals Foundation

Guided by a deep respect for the healing power of plants, the foundation promotes environmental conservation, the empowerment and preservation of the indigenous people that cultivate and collect medicinal herbs, and community development and empowerment in the communities in which medicinal herbs are collected as well as the community in…

$190k
Granted FY2025still arriving
61
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$46k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$181kFood & Nutrition$77kEnvironment$68kEducation$67kCommunity Improvement$56kHuman Services$45kReligion$19kArts & Culture$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 61 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k55 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $122k
$1,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Botanical Bus$46,000
Landpaths$25,500
Oko Farms$20,000
Redwood Empire Food Bank$10,650
Graton Green Group$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Food For Thought$5,000
ABCs for Global Health$5,000
Upward$5,000
Sonoma County Action Network$5,000
WomenServe$3,000
Berkeley Herbal Center$3,000
Herbalism Conferences LLC$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
CFSCSW100$2,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Camp Kesem National: $100 → 14%North Bay Childrens Center: $1k → 8%Just Basics Inc: $250 → 9%Old Spokes Home: $50 → 10%North Bay Childrens Center: $1k → 8%North Bay Childrens Center: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
IA
OH
PA
CA
MO
VA
MD
AR
NC
DC
HI
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 95% of Traditional Medicinals Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 83% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 5%.

Traditional Medicinals Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$582k · 41 repeat orgs$227k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
76

Total granted

$582k
$159k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+8%

Still filing today

63%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    BOTANICAL BUS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $162k · revenue +411%
  • RE
    REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK
    6× · 2020–2025 · $71k · revenue +17%
  • THE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT
    5× · 2020–2025 · $35k · revenue +127%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • S
    Surgicorp
    one grant, 2019 · $18k
  • MM
    MARWAR MUSLIM EDUCATIONAL & W
    one grant, 2017 · $14k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
3
World Coffee Research

World coffee research unites the global coffee industry to drive science-based agricultural solutions to urgently secure a diverse and sustainable supply of quality coffee today and for generations to come. our mission is to grow, protect,…

International
4
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
5
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
6
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
7
Center for the study of the Americas

Within the Americas promoting dialogue and research, producing studies and reports, conducting courses and conferences particularly in the areas of agroecology and food security

—
8
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
9
Conservation Society of California

Through management of oakland zoo, the conservation society of california deepens connection with animals, saves wildlife, and inspires champions for the natural world.

Animals
10
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
11
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
12
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West County Health Centers Inc; the most unlike its peers is Womenserve. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

81 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 81 of the 154 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
79/81
Grantees still filing
42/81
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Community Action Partnership: $54,000 · OtherCommunity Action PartnershipWORLDWIDE ENDOMARCH INC: $30,000 · OtherWORLDWIDE ENDOMARCH INCIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOko Farms: $20,000 · OtherOko FarmsIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSurgicorp: $17,500 · OtherMARWAR MUSLIM EDUCATIONAL & W: $14,000 · Other+108 more: $160,300 · Other+108 moreBOTANICAL BUS: $162,400 · EducationBOTANICAL BUSWOMENSERVE: $29,649 · EducationWOMENSERVERise Up 94965 Foundation: $7,500 · Education+12 more: $18,784 · Education+12 moreREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $70,850 · Food & NutritionREDWOOD EMPI…FOOD FOR THOUGHT: $11,500 · Food & NutritionFOOD FOR THO…CCOF FOUNDATION: $4,500 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $25 · Food & NutritionLandPaths: $78,250 · EnvironmentLandPaths+4 more: $4,700 · Environment+4 moreTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $35,277 · Human ServicesEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $6,250 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,060 · Human ServicesNORTH BAY CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $3,000 · Human Services+4 more: $460 · Human ServicesUNITING PROFESIONAL WOMEN ACCELERATING RELATIONSHIPS: $15,000 · EmploymentNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthABCs for Global Health Inc: $5,000 · HealthAmerican Botanical Council: $4,000 · HealthWEST COUNTY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $600 · Health+2 more: $125 · Health
Other$345,800Education$218,333Food & Nutrition$86,875Environment$82,950Human Services$48,047Employment$15,000Health$14,725

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOTANICAL BUS: $162,400 over 6y, 9.2% of budgetLandPaths: $78,250 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $70,850 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $35,277 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetWORLDWIDE ENDOMARCH INC: $30,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetWOMENSERVE: $29,649 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetUNITING PROFESIONAL WOMEN ACCELERATING RELATIONSHIPS: $15,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetFOOD FOR THOUGHT: $11,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRise Up 94965 Foundation: $7,500 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $6,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget10000 DEGREES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYouth in Arts: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCCOF FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $4,304 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Botanical Council: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,060 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOTATI-ROHNERT PARK CO-OP NURSERY SCHOOL: $3,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetNORTH BAY CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSebastopol Community Cultural Center Incorporated: $2,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE GLENWOOD SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetKID SCOOP NEWS: $2,300 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc: $2,080 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASSION WITHOUT BORDERS: $2,027 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVERMONT COMMONS SCHOOL: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSONOMA FAMILY MEAL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLaguna De Santa Rosa Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PETALUMA RIVER: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLUXEMBOURG AMERICAN CULTURAL SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,320 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBennett Valley Alliance of Parents and Teachers: $1,200 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMiddletown-Cobb Little League: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVERMONT CENTER FOR INTEGRATIVE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMILL VALLEY SCHOOLS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION DBA KIDDO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of the Cuyahoga County Animal Shelter: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCentro Laboral de Graton: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMONTVERDE ACADEMY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRACKGIRLZ: $750 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNA VIDA: $750 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $660 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MPS SOCIETY INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWEST COUNTY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOGOREA TE LAND TRUST: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPETALUMA PET PALS: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOTANICAL BUS ↗
  • Who funds LandPaths ↗
  • Who funds REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds WORLDWIDE ENDOMARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMENSERVE ↗
  • Who funds UNITING PROFESIONAL WOMEN ACCELERATING RELATIONSHIPS ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THOUGHT ↗
  • Who funds Rise Up 94965 Foundation ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds 10000 DEGREES ↗
  • Who funds Youth in Arts ↗
  • Who funds ABCs for Global Health Inc ↗
  • Who funds CCOF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds American Botanical Council ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds COTATI-ROHNERT PARK CO-OP NURSERY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NORTH BAY CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sonoma County Community FoundationCA31× affinity13 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sonoma County Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Sonoma County Vintners Foundation · The Vermont Community Foundation · Bothin Foundation · Weinreb Pilecki Segal Foundation · The Heck Foundation · The Joseph and Vera Long Foundation · Redwood Credit Union Community Fund Inc · Cs Fund · Speedway Children's Charities

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Traditional Medicinals Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Traditional Medicinals Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 37%
  • Center On Rural Innovation Inc: 37% of income from government
  • Xerces Society Inc: 22% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Traditional Medicinals Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Traditional Medicinals Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 154 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Traditional Medicinals’ filings →

More from the funding graph