Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tracy Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$269k
Granted FY2021
16
Grants FY2021
7
States reached
$40k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

52% of Tracy Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Whitefish Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 7 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Tracy Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $269k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
’17
8
’18
11
’19
7
’20
10
’21
7
’22
4
’23
4
’24
7
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$423kEducation$417kFood & Nutrition$286kCrime & Legal$266kHealth$231kYouth Development$108kCivil Rights$70kRecreation & Sports$67kOther$0
02FY2021 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k6 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $239k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK$40,000
WHITEFISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$38,000
FLATHEAD VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$30,000
MONTANA INNOCENCE PROJECT$30,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GLACIER COUNTY$26,000
EQUISHUI$25,000
FARM HANDS$20,000
BRIDGE THE GAP COLLEGE PREP$10,000
WEDI FOUNDATION$10,000
DREAM ADAPTIVE RECREATION INC$10,000
COLUMBIA FALLS FOOD BANK$5,000
ANGELS PLACE$5,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$5,000
TEMPLE BETH ISRAEL OF LONGBOAT KEY$5,000
CENTER FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $4k → 9%ANGELS PLACE: $10k → 8%ANGELS PLACE: $10k → 8%ANGELS PLACE: $5k → 8%ANGELS PLACE: $5k → 8%ANGELS PLACE: $3k → 8%ANGELS PLACE: $3k → 8%CENTER FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MT
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CA
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 13% of Tracy Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Tracy Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 21 repeat orgs$213k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +150% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2021, 7 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
16

Total granted

$1.4M
$109k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+150%
+43%

Still filing today

52%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCrime & LegalFood & NutritionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MI
    MONTANA INNOCENCE PROJECT
    8× · 2017–2025 · $255k · revenue +252%
  • ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $90k · revenue +150%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GLACIER COUNTRY
    3× · 2019–2021 · $60k · revenue +211%

Funded once

  • KR
    KALISPELL REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +43%
  • GB
    GLACIER BABE RUTH LEAGUE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • A
    ACAE
    one grant, 2018 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Flathead Food Bank Inc

The Flathead Food Bank strives to elimnate hunger in the Flathead Valley through collaborative partnerships creating effective solutions to connect and strengthen individuals, families and the community through access to healthy nutritious…

Food & Nutrition
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
4
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
5
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
6
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
7
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
8
The Montana Land Reliance

The mission of the montana land reliance (mlr) is to partner with landowners to provide permanent protection for private lands that are significant for agricultural production, fish and wildlife habitat, and open space.

Environment
9
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
10
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
11
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
12
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Village Inc; the most unlike its peers is Overcome Vision Loss Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FLATHEAD VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $284,000 · OtherFLATHEAD VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCEQUISHUI: $128,000 · OtherEQUISHUILAND TO HAND MONTANA: $110,000 · OtherLAND TO HAND MONTANAFARM HANDS: $50,000 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MONTANA: $50,000 · OtherWARREN HIGH SCHOOL: $44,000 · OtherANGELS' PLACE: $35,000 · Other+28 more: $288,000 · Other+28 moreWHITEFISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $423,000 · PhilanthropyWHITEFISH COMMUNITY FOUND…KALISPELL REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyKALISPELL REGIONAL HEALTH…MONTANA INNOCENCE PROJECT: $255,000 · Crime & LegalMONTANA INNOCE…+2 more: $6,000 · Crime & LegalALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC: $90,000 · Food & NutritionMONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC: $25,000 · Food & NutritionCOLUMBIA FALLS FOOD BANK: $10,000 · Food & NutritionBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GLACIER COUNTRY: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentBridge the Gap College Prep: $47,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE WEDI FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthPLYMOUTH HARBOR INC: $20,000 · HealthTHE EHE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthDREAM ADAPTIVE RECREATION INC: $46,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$989,000Philanthropy$448,000Crime & Legal$261,000Food & Nutrition$125,000Youth Development$107,500Health$51,000Recreation & Sports$46,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWHITEFISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $423,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetFLATHEAD VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $284,000 over 7y, 4.9% of budgetMONTANA INNOCENCE PROJECT: $255,000 over 8y, 19% of budgetALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC: $90,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GLACIER COUNTRY: $60,000 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetBridge the Gap College Prep: $47,500 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetDREAM ADAPTIVE RECREATION INC: $46,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetANGELS' PLACE: $35,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA WEST COAST PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKALISPELL REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPLYMOUTH HARBOR INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACLU OF MONTANA FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCOLUMBIA FALLS FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR LAW AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE EHE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREED INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Sanders Institute: $5,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetCENTER FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMER SEARCH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIXTH JUDICIAL COURT CASAGAL PROGRAM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetOvercome Vision Loss Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WHITEFISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FLATHEAD VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA INNOCENCE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GLACIER COUNTRY ↗
  • Who funds Bridge the Gap College Prep ↗
  • Who funds DREAM ADAPTIVE RECREATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ANGELS' PLACE ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA WEST COAST PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds KALISPELL REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PLYMOUTH HARBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds ACLU OF MONTANA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA FALLS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR LAW AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EHE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds REED INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds The Sanders Institute ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Interstate BancSystem Foundation IncMT20× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Whitefish Community Foundation Inc · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Hallowell Fdn Agency-Main · Ila B Dousman Fund Inc · The Angora Ridge Foundation · Headwaters Health Foundation of Western Montana · Montana Community Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tracy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tracy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • All Faiths Food Bank Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Reed Institute: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tracy Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Tracy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tracy’s filings →

More from the funding graph