Skip to content

· Private foundation

Trace Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$277k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$123k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$366kEducation$344kCrime & Legal$161kEnvironment$149kInternational$83kCommunity Improvement$40kScience & Tech$5kSocial Science$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$103,625
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DEEP SOUTH TODAY$123,000
SALT SPRING INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABILITY EDUCATION AND ACTION$103,625
JOURNALISM DEVELOPMENT NETWORK$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 69% of grant dollars ($829k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 31% that went abroad ($377k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 60% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%TSNE MISSIONWORKS: $30k → 16%BERKLEY LAW - UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $25k → 10%INTEREXCHANGE: $1k → 17%JOURNALISM DEVELOPMENT NETWORK: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF LAW: $71k → 9%DEEP SOUTH TODAY: $123k → 11%BERKELEY LAW - UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $5k → 10%JOURNALISM DEVELOPMENT NETWORK: $40k → 14%BERKLEY LAW - UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $20k → 10%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA: $25k → 14%THE OO PROJECT INC: $40k → 14%THE OO PROJECT INC: $5k → 14%THE OUTLAW OCEAN LLC: $3k → 14%AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION FUND FOR JUSTICE AND EDUCATION: $50k → 14%INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR JOURNALISTS: $25k → 14%INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR JOURNALISTS: $15k → 14%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER: $86k → 14%INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR JOURNALISTS: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 31% of all-years giving ($377k)

5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$314k · 9 grants
United Kingdom$48k · 1 grant
Netherlands$10k · 1 grant
Norway$5k · 1 grant
Ecuador$1k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$547k · 6 repeat orgs$660k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
16

Total granted

$547k
$433k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+43%

Still filing today

67%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $227k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationArts & CultureCrime & LegalEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    The Alfred Friendly Foundation
    5× · 2018–2022 · $215k · revenue -85%
  • TI
    THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR CRIMINAL LAW REFORM AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE POLIC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $110k
  • JD
    JOURNALISM DEVELOPMENT NETWORK INC
    2× · 2022–2025 · $90k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $86k · revenue +47%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF LAW
    one grant, 2017 · $71k
  • AB
    American Bar Association Fund for Justice and Education
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Consortium of Investigative Journalists Inc

International consortium of investigative journalists, inc.'s (icij) mission is to show people how the world really works through stories that rock the world; forcing positive change.

International
2
Kurt Schork Memorial Fund
Education
3
The International Center

The International Center is a District of Columbia 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization founded in 1977, has as its principal purpose the promotion of greater international understanding and the lessening of international frictions and…

International
4
Fuller Project for International Reporting Inc

The fuller project is the global newsroom dedicated to groundbreaking reporting that catalyzes positive change for women.

International
5
Fund for Investigative Journalism Inc

The organization provides critical support to independent journalists to investigate news stories regarding corruption, malfeasance, exploitation, misappropriation of funds in the public and private sectors.

—
6
Internews Network

Internews is an international non-profit organization whose mission is to empower local media worldwide to give people the news and information they need, the ability to connect and the means to make their voices heard.

Arts & Culture
7
Institute of International Bankers

The iib represents the interests of the international banking community before u.s. legislative/regulatory bodies liaises with international regulatory bodies serves as a source of information to the media and other interested parties…

—
8
American Journalism Project Inc

The american journalism project, inc. is a first-of-its-kind venture philanthropy dedicated to building and supporting local news across the country. american journalism project makes grants to nonprofit news organizations, partners with…

Arts & Culture
9
The National Bureau of Asian Research

Nbr conducts advanced independent research on strategic, political, economic, energy, globalization, and health issues affecting u.s. relations with asia. drawing upon an extensive network of the world's leading specialists and leveraging…

—
10
The Association of Foreign Press Corresp in the Usa (Afpc-Usa)

The assocn. of foreign press corrs. usa serves the community of international correspondents in the u.s. through educational programs, educational publications, and the production of educational content, as well as scholarships, excellence…

Education
11
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
12
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Int'l Center for Journalists Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Alfred Friendly Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Alfred Friendly Foundation: $215,000 · OtherThe Alfred Friendly FoundationTHE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR CRIMINAL LAW REFORM AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE POLIC: $110,000 · OtherTHE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR CRIMINAL LAW REFORM AND CRIMINAL JUSTI…SALT SPRING INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABILITY EDUCATION AND ACTION: $103,625 · OtherSALT SPRING INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABILITY EDUCATION AND ACTIONUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF LAW: $70,656 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF LAWKINGS COLLEGE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY: $47,524 · OtherKINGS COLLEGE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE INTEGRITY FELLOWSHIP AND SANCTUARY: $40,000 · OtherTHE INTEGRITY FELLOWSHIP AND SANCTUARYIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA: $25,000 · Other+6 more: $28,754 · OtherJOURNALISM DEVELOPMENT NETWORK INC: $90,000 · EducationJOURNALISM DEVEL…GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $85,500 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVE…DEEP SOUTH TODAY: $123,000 · Arts & CultureDEEP SOUTH …THE INT'L CENTER FOR JOURNALISTS INC: $41,500 · InternationalAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA: $25,000 · International+1 more: $1,055 · InternationalAmerican Bar Association Fund for Justice and Education: $50,000 · Crime & LegalOO PROJECT: $45,000 · EnvironmentTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $30,000 · Community Improvement
Other$715,559Education$175,500Arts & Culture$123,000International$67,555Crime & Legal$50,000Environment$45,000Community Improvement$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Alfred Friendly Foundation: $215,000 over 5y, 22% of budgetJOURNALISM DEVELOPMENT NETWORK INC: $90,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $85,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Bar Association Fund for Justice and Education: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOO PROJECT: $45,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE INT'L CENTER FOR JOURNALISTS INC: $41,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTEREXCHANGE INC: $1,055 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Alfred Friendly Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DEEP SOUTH TODAY ↗
  • Who funds JOURNALISM DEVELOPMENT NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds American Bar Association Fund for Justice and Education ↗
  • Who funds OO PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THE INT'L CENTER FOR JOURNALISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA ↗
  • Who funds INTEREXCHANGE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ford FoundationNY13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ford Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Trace Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Trace Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Third Sector New England Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Trace Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Trace Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Trace’s filings →

More from the funding graph