Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tr Ua 06162003

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$49MArts & Culture$32MScience & Tech$20MReligion$12MHealth$6.3MInternational$1.1MYouth Development$1.0MRecreation & Sports$680kOther$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 100% of reported assets are held in Investment In Bil Ltd.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SoundWaters Inc$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $213k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Center For Hope and Safety: $25k → 7%PROJECT LEAD INC: $30k → 13%Mourning Family Foundation: $20k → 15%THE BLUE CARD INC: $40k → 17%WORLD CHILDHOOD FOUNDATION: $22k → 17%MITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $2k → 20%The Innocence Project Inc: $71k → 17%UNION SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Tr Ua 06162003’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Tr Ua 06162003lessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$103M · 43 repeat orgs$11M to everyone else

43 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2023, 42 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
122

Total granted

$103M
$11M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+21%

Still filing today

53%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureEducationHealthInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $20M · revenue +17%
  • DS
    DALTON SCHOOLS INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $4.6M · revenue +16%
  • TY
    THE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2017–2021 · $4.0M · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMER FRIENDS NATIONAL Portrait GALL
    one grant, 2022 · $2.7M
  • FA
    Found Adv of Religious Observance a
    one grant, 2017 · $1.2M
  • BT
    BALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $596k · revenue -27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
2
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
4
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
8
Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust

The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.

Arts & Culture
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Forward Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blavatnik Archive Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

108 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 108 of the 171 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
107/108
Grantees still filing
67/108
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Carnegie Hall Society Inc: $15,000,000 · OtherThe Carnegie Hall Society IncNEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $12,488,888 · OtherNEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCESYALE UNIVERSITY: $12,400,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univer: $5,573,300 · OtherAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv UniverAmerican Friends of Victoria Albert: $4,052,243 · OtherAmerican Friends of Victoria AlbertCOLEL CHABAD: $2,889,375 · OtherAMER FRIENDS NATIONAL Portrait GALL: $2,724,270 · Other+93 more: $16,353,254 · Other+93 moreAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $20,215,040 · EducationAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INCPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $7,242,775 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard…DALTON SCHOOLS INC: $4,600,000 · EducationDALTON SCHOOLS INCTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $1,197,000 · Education+12 more: $2,030,145 · Education+12 moreTHE BETTER ANGELS SOCIETY INC: $3,000,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $899,050 · Arts & CultureBALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC: $596,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK CITY BALLET INC: $543,000 · Arts & CultureBLAVATNIK ARCHIVE FOUNDATION: $377,000 · Arts & CultureDANCE DOWNTOWN LA INC LA DANCE PROJECT: $297,000 · Arts & CultureALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC: $296,000 · Arts & Culture+23 more: $1,369,075 · Arts & CultureTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION: $4,008,000 · ReligionLIMMUD FSU INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $250,000 · Religion+3 more: $98,333 · ReligionRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC: $3,300,000 · Health+8 more: $279,112 · HealthCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $482,897 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $247,500 · PhilanthropyDANIELLA MOFFSON FOUNDATION INC: $166,640 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $58,000 · PhilanthropyFEDERATION OF JEWISH COMMUNITIES OF THE CIS INC: $55,000 · PhilanthropyENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Philanthropy+3 more: $52,000 · PhilanthropyFRESH AIR FUND: $368,550 · Recreation & SportsUSA Swimming Foundation Inc: $47,400 · Recreation & Sports
Other$71,481,330Education$35,284,960Arts & Culture$7,377,125Religion$4,356,333Health$3,579,112Philanthropy$1,112,037Recreation & Sports$415,950

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $20,215,040 over 6y, 15% of budgetThe Carnegie Hall Society Inc: $15,000,000 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetNEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $12,488,888 over 3y, 25% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $7,242,775 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDALTON SCHOOLS INC: $4,600,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION: $4,008,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC: $3,300,000 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetTHE BETTER ANGELS SOCIETY INC: $3,000,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $1,197,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College: $1,000,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ALLEN-STEVENSON SCHOOL: $1,000,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetNEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $899,050 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetBALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC: $596,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNEW YORK CITY BALLET INC: $543,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $500,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $482,897 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBLAVATNIK ARCHIVE FOUNDATION: $377,000 over 1y, 69% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $368,550 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetDANCE DOWNTOWN LA INC LA DANCE PROJECT: $297,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC: $296,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLIMMUD FSU INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetTONY BLAIR AFRICA GOVERNANCE INITIATIVE -US D/B/A TONY BLAIR FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $247,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTRAVINSKY INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $220,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJACOB'S PILLOW DANCE FESTIVAL INC: $166,666 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDANIELLA MOFFSON FOUNDATION INC: $166,640 over 2y, 37% of budgetMACCABI WORLD UNION INC: $150,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $148,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW 42ND STREET INC: $140,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FRIENDS OF THE LONDON LIBRARY INC: $129,365 over 3y, 22% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $125,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTATE AMERICAS FOUNDATION: $105,519 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSOUNDWATERS INC: $100,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $97,250 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetOPENDOR MEDIA INC: $83,333 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetJOHNNY MAC TENNIS PROJECT INC: $82,360 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetMETROPOLE FILM BOARD INC CO OREN JACOBY: $75,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $71,305 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $58,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEDERATION OF JEWISH COMMUNITIES OF THE CIS INC: $55,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBABSON COLLEGE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $50,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds The Carnegie Hall Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds DALTON SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BETTER ANGELS SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Middlebury College ↗
  • Who funds THE ALLEN-STEVENSON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds BALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds BLAVATNIK ARCHIVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRESH AIR FUND ↗
  • Who funds DANCE DOWNTOWN LA INC LA DANCE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds ALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LIMMUD FSU INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TONY BLAIR AFRICA GOVERNANCE INITIATIVE -US D/B/A TONY BLAIR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blavatnik Family FoundationNY67.8× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blavatnik Family Foundation · Blavatnik Family Foundation 2020 · Jewish Communal Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Indian Trail Charitable Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The New York Community Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · The Ronald & Jo Carole Lauder Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tr Ua 06162003 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tr Ua 06162003. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Center for Hope and Safety Inc: 69% of income from government
  • Aha Foundation Inc: 42% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Soundwaters Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Babson College: 3% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College: 1% of income from government
  • Silvermine Guild of Artists Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Jacob's Pillow Dance Festival Inc: 1% of income from government
  • New World Symphony Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Amherst College Trustees: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Yehudi Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Global Empowerment Mission Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 171 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tr Ua 06162003’s filings →

More from the funding graph