Skip to content

· Private foundation

Totsy Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$41kPhilanthropy$25kReligion$20kHuman Services$20kRecreation & Sports$8kArts & Culture$3kInternational$3kEducation$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$800
Median grant
5
States reached
$290k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JIMMY FUND-DANA FARBER$2,700
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER-ADOLPH AND ROSE LEVIS$2,650
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SPBC$1,300
Individual grant recipient$1,060
PAPS CORPS FOR CANCER RESEARCH$1,000
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$800
HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC$800
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$800
FAU LIFE LEARNING CENTER$700
BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$500
COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES$500
TEMPLE BETH EL - KOL NIDRE$450
TEMPLE AVODAH$250
PLAY FOR PINK$150
PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KIDS IN DISTRESS: $200 → 13%KIDS IN DISTRESS: $100 → 13%KIDS IN DISTRESS: $100 → 13%KIDS IN DISTRESS: $10 → 13%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $2k → 11%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $10 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
NC
SC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$117k · 38 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against -47% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
8

Total granted

$117k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
-47%

Still filing today

37%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporation
    8× · 2018–2025 · $16k · revenue +78%
  • HI
    HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6k · revenue +46%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    7× · 2017–2023 · $6k · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue -13%
  • BE
    BETH EL TEMPLE - CENTENNIAL CAMPAIGN
    one grant, 2023 · $20
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER - IN FUND JEWISH FILM FESTIVAL
    one grant, 2023 · $20
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
2
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
3
The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc

The mission of the breast cancer research foundation, inc. is to prevent and cure breast cancer by advancing the world's most promising research.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
5
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
6
Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network Inc

The mission of Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network (DFCCN) is to promote and support, directly or indirectly, the interests and purposes of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI).

Health
7
Cog Research Foundation Llc

Cog research foundation, llc is a california 501(c)(3) entity founded in 2024 and designed to become the federal grantee organization for the children's oncology group (cog). the cog, a member of the national cancer institute (nci)…

Health
8
Fcancer

FCANCER IS dedicated to advancing health equity through early detection and prevention programs, and by providing resources to navigate, manage, and cope with cancer.

Health
9
Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research

The foundation for sarcoidosis research (fsr) is the leading international organization dedicated to finding a cure for sarcoidosis and improving care for sarcoidosis patients through research, education, and support. since its…

Philanthropy
10
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc

To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.

—
11
Foundation for Women's Cancer

To support and empower all affected by gynecologic cancers through education, research, and public awareness.

Health
12
Cancer Research and Biostatistics

To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids in Distress Inc; the most unlike its peers is Share and Care Cockayne Syndrome Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
11/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF SPBC: $18,700 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF SPBCTEMPLE BETH EL: $10,220 · OtherTEMPLE BETH ELTEMPLE AVODAH: $7,260 · OtherTEMPLE AVODAHJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER - IN FUND CAPITAL CAMPAIGN: $5,549 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER - IN FUND CAPITAL CAMPAIGNJIMMY FUND-DANA FARBER: $5,300 · OtherJIMMY FUND-DANA FARBERADDISON RESERVE PAPS CORPS: $5,260 · OtherADDISON RESERVE PAPS CORPSPAPS CORPS FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $4,935 · OtherPAPS CORPS FOR CANCER RESEARCHNATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $4,910 · OtherNATIONAL MS SOCIETYJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER-ADOLPH AND ROSE LEVIS: $3,150 · OtherTEMPLE BETH EL - KOL NIDRE: $2,860 · Other+24 more: $9,800 · Other+24 moreChildren's Hospital Corporation: $16,433 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corpo…Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $5,580 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Instit…The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $3,510 · HealthThe Susan G Komen Breast …BAYSTATE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $2,260 · HealthBAYSTATE HEALTH FOUNDATIO…+2 more: $120 · HealthHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $6,160 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $10 · Recreation & SportsFLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $2,010 · Human ServicesHELPUSADOPTORG INC: $1,210 · Human ServicesKIDS IN DISTRESS INC: $410 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $2,600 · InternationalTHE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureBOCA RATON MUSEUM OF ART: $260 · Arts & CulturePROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $660 · PhilanthropyCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $500 · Philanthropy+1 more: $20 · Philanthropy
Other$77,944Health$27,903Recreation & Sports$6,170Human Services$3,630International$2,600Arts & Culture$2,260Philanthropy$1,180

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $16,433 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $6,160 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $5,580 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $3,510 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $2,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAYSTATE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $2,260 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $2,010 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPUSADOPTORG INC: $1,210 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetELIJAH ROSS FOUNDATION INC: $1,010 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $660 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $510 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS IN DISTRESS INC: $410 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOCA RATON MUSEUM OF ART: $260 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEE IT UP FOR THE TROOPS INC: $235 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHORDOMA FOUNDATION: $110 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMACCABI USA INC: $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds BAYSTATE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPUSADOPTORG INC ↗
  • Who funds ELIJAH ROSS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
  • Who funds KIDS IN DISTRESS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOCA RATON MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds TEE IT UP FOR THE TROOPS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA10.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Totsy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Totsy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The Center for Independent Documentary Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Baystate Health Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Kids in Distress Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Totsy’s filings →

More from the funding graph