Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

San Diego Festival of the Arts Foundation Inc

Organize, operate, and support sports and recreation programs for san diegans with disabilities, while providing the highest quality arts and entertainment experience for its contributors, volunteers, and visitors of corporation sponsored activities in support of that mission.

$15k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Recreation & Sports$152kHealth$57k
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$250k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Sharp Arts for Healing Program: $9k → 11%ADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%Sharp Arts for Healing Program: $9k → 11%Paralyzed Veterans of America-Cal D: $14k → 11%Paralyzed Veterans of America-Cal D: $13k → 11%Paralyzed Veterans of America-Cal D: $13k → 11%Mission Bay Aquatic Center: $10k → 11%Mission Bay Aquatic Center: $10k → 11%Mission Bay Aquatic Center: $8k → 11%Mission Bay Aquatic Center: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$194k · 5 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
1

Total granted

$194k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+25%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22
HealthRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DS
    DISABLED SPORTS USA - ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATION INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $65k · revenue +40%
  • PV
    PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA CAL-DIEGO CHAPTER
    3× · 2017–2019 · $40k · revenue +36%
  • AS
    ASSOCIATED STUDENTS OF SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $34k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • AS
    ADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    2× · 2022–2023 · $15k · revenue +25%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DISABLED SPORTS USA - ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATION INC — $64,500 · OtherDISABLED SPORTS USA - ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATION INCPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA CAL-DIEGO CHAPTER — $40,000 · OtherPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA CAL-DIEGO CHAPTERSAN DIEGO ADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION DBA ADAPTIVE SPORTS & RECREATION — $39,000 · OtherSAN DIEGO ADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION DBA ADAPTIVE SPORTS & RECREATIONASSOCIATED STUDENTS OF SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY — $33,850 · OtherASSOCIATED STUDENTS OF SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITYSharp Healthcare Foundation — $17,000 · HealthSharp Hea…ADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$177,350Health$17,000Recreation & Sports$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDISABLED SPORTS USA - ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATION INC — $64,500 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA CAL-DIEGO CHAPTER — $40,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetSAN DIEGO ADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION DBA ADAPTIVE SPORTS & RECREATION — $39,000 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetASSOCIATED STUDENTS OF SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY — $33,850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSharp Healthcare Foundation — $17,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization San Diego Festival of the Arts Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to San Diego Festival of the Arts Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to San Diego Festival of the Arts Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports $105k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph